- TA的作品
- 作品笔记(0)
- 作品书评(0)
-
International Security Studies (Volume 4, Number 2, Winter 2018 ) 收藏
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的英文半年集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 29.4 试读
-
International Security Studies(Volume 4, Number 1, Summer 2018 ) 收藏
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的英文半年集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 29.4 试读
-
International Security Studies (Volume 3, Number 2, Winter 2017 ) 收藏
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的对应英文集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 29.4 试读
-
International Security Studies (Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017) 收藏
关键词: State Recognition separatism Consensus Politics China-India Releationship Regional Security Governance
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的对应英文集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 26.7 试读
-
International Security Studies (No.4) 收藏
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的对应英文集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 26.7 试读
-
International Security Studies (Volume 4, Number 2, Winter 2018 ) 收藏
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的英文半年集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 29.4 试读
-
International Security Studies(Volume 4, Number 1, Summer 2018 ) 收藏
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的英文半年集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 29.4 试读
-
International Security Studies (Volume 3, Number 2, Winter 2017 ) 收藏
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的对应英文集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 29.4 试读
-
International Security Studies (Volume 3, Number 1, Summer 2017) 收藏
关键词: State Recognition separatism Consensus Politics China-India Releationship Regional Security Governance
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的对应英文集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 26.7 试读
-
International Security Studies (No.4) 收藏
简 介:本书是由国际关系学院主办的《国际安全研究》的对应英文集刊,主题是国际安全理论研究,内容涉及不干涉内政学说、世界体系的发展、历史视角中的三次世界大战、质性和平的条件比较(当代东亚与战后西欧)、当代国际安全的文化价值基础、互联网对国际政治影响机理、中国周边安全环境指标体系及其评估、联合阵线与美国军事干涉等问题的研究。
¥ 26.7 试读
-
关键词:
出处: International Security Studies(Volume 4, Number 1, Summer 2018 )
简 介:Some scholars believe that the boundary between geo-economics and geopolitics tends to be increasingly blurred, but political effects on the basis of geopolitics still prevail in reality. To some extent,as is pointed out,the importance of geography and geopolitics constantly emphasized by scholars has given way to the assertion that the power of economic cooperation has outweighed military power in the post-Cold War era. However,this is not the case,especially in the Asia-Pacific region. Domestic studies on offensive realism are mainly centered on introducing the theory in itself to serve the purpose of analyzing the situations in the United States and China as well as giving critical comments on the theory of offensive realism. Although the theory is regarded as immoral and offensive realism criticized as “theoretically reactionary”, there is no denying that offensive realism,for all its flaws,takes root in and springs up from the fertile soil of reality. Objectively speaking,there is no such thing as a perfect theory to explain all the phenomena of international relations. Although constructivism and idealism have injected new momentum into the development of international relations theory,many state actors in the international community are more inclined to contemplate issues from a realistic standpoint.
¥ 22.73 试读
-
Ethnicity Security:The Concept,Theory and Paradigm 收藏
关键词:
出处: International Security Studies(Volume 4, Number 1, Summer 2018 )
简 介:There has been a trend of continuous enrichment in the realm and spectrum of human knowledge,brought about by the refinement of academic study and the concerns over related topics. As ethnical communities get involved into political ecology and grow into an explicit factor in security,changes are taking place in anthropology and ethnology,which used to take culture as their major research approach. A field of ethnical political studies has been established by some researchers,connecting ethnical studies and political issues. The same applies to security studies as it goes beyond traditional scope and combines traditional and non-traditional security research,at a time of increasing factors of national and international security. It is precisely such combination of ethnical and security issues that gave rise to the attempt made by this paper at theoretical research of ethnicity security.
¥ 10.93 试读
-
关键词:
出处: International Security Studies(Volume 4, Number 1, Summer 2018 )
简 介:Editor’s Note: The international conference “Assessing the International Nuclear Agenda”,which was sponsored by the University of International Relations and co-organized by the Journal of International Security Studies and the Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs,John F. Kennedy School of Government,Harvard University was held on June 16-17,2017,Beijing. Some top scholars in nuclear studies attended the conference and made a splendid array of speeches. The following articles are based on their shorthand manuscripts of speeches and have been reviewed by themselves. International Security Studies wants to thank the scholars who are willing to share their insightful views with our readers.
¥ 21.15 试读
-
Will Non-Proliferation Continue to Be a Light Spot in China-US Cooperation? 收藏
关键词:
出处: International Security Studies(Volume 4, Number 1, Summer 2018 )
简 介:Security relations between China and the US have been complex,with contentions going alongside cooperation in a framework not exactly hostile but not friendly either. Against this backdrop,non-proliferation has been a light spot in China-US security cooperation in the past decade,and from the Six-Party Talks on DPRK’s nuclear program to the Iran nuclear deal,from the Nuclear Security Summits to their cooperation in export control,multiple fruits have resulted from such interactions. In Apr 2017,the DPRK nuclear program appeared together with trade as two core issues to be discussed by the heads of state of China and the US during their meeting in Mar-a-Lago,showing the important role of non-proliferation in China-US relations. However,recent years have witnessed changes in the world non-proliferation environment,and issues that once brought China and the US closer have gradually cooled down,including the Iran nuclear issue and that of nuclear security,while the THAAD deployment in Korea,the threshold for Nuclear Suppliers Group(NSG)membership and others that have set them apart,have loomed large. Therefore,it remains to be seen whether non-proliferation will continue to shine as a light spot in China-US cooperation.
¥ 14.27 试读
-
The Nuclear Ban Treaty:What Would Follow? 收藏
关键词:
出处: International Security Studies(Volume 4, Number 1, Summer 2018 )
简 介:On March 27,2017,negotiations began at the United Nations(UN)in New York to draft a treaty “to negotiate a legally binding instrument to prohibit nuclear weapons,leading towards their total elimination.” Forty-eight countries in December 2016 registered their lack of support for this undertaking,either by voting no or abstaining. This included all of the world’s nuclear-armed states except North Korea. Most of the opposing and abstaining states rely to some degree on nuclear deterrence extended by their allies or security partners. However,113 countries voted to make these negotiations happen. Proponents of a prospective prohibition treaty argue that dramatic action is needed to speed up achievement of the ultimate goal of global nuclear disarmament. They argue that “there has been little perceptible progress on the multilateral nuclear disarmament pillar under the NPT,” and that “outlawing nuclear weapons is a moral and humanitarian imperative.” Further,they posit a legal requirement for nuclear disarmament based on their reading of Article VI of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty(NPT)and the 1996 International Court of Justice advisory opinion on the “Legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons.” Proponents believe that a prohibition treaty ultimately will engender international pressure that will compel nuclear-armed states and others that rely on nuclear deterrence to “conform to the new global norm.”
¥ 8.54 试读