- TA的作品
- 作品笔记(0)
- 作品书评(1)
-
-
珠海法治发展报告（No.5·2023） 收藏
吴轼 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 王祎茗 副主编 2023年05月 出版
简 介：法治蓝皮书《珠海法治发展报告No.5(2023》分析了珠海2022年法治建设总体情况，并从立法探索、法治政府、司法建设、跨境法治、社会治理角度，对珠海法治发展进行了全面总结分析，对未来珠海在习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的指导下，以珠澳社会治理合作为抓手，实施粤澳深度合作的区域法治协同战略，推动横琴粤澳深度合作区成为改革开放的窗口、法治建设的试验田和新高地，推动珠海高质量发展成为最安全稳定、最公平公正、法治环境最好的地区。 《珠海法治发展报告No.5(2022》全面梳理总结了2022年珠海法治实践的总体概况，并提出：未来，珠海将进一步聚焦珠澳深度合作，为实现高质量发展加强法规制度供给，构建现代产业体系，加强高水平科技创新，建设联动港澳的金融开放体系，在数字法治政府建设、营商环境优化、多元的公共法律服务等方面促进港澳人才、资本、信息、技术等要素在大湾区更便捷地流动，并以高质量司法服务保障更高水平对外开放，以更加完善社会治理体系、丰富多样的法治宣传教育，深化民生领域合作，加快实现与澳门的一体化发展，在坚持和完善“一国两制”上展现新担当、作出新贡献。
¥ 69.5 试读
-
简 介：本书从医疗卫生机构及医务人员、医疗保障、中医药、卫生安全监管等方面，聚焦法治热点，全面梳理了中国近年来卫生领域法治建设的探索与经验。书中就医疗卫生保障总体情况、卫生安全监管、中医药、儿童健康法治、公共卫生事件应对等领域推出全国层面的研究报告，对法治医院建设、医疗美容纠纷化解等议题进行专门研讨；对药品广告监管、中医药监管、自媒体医疗建议监管、控烟监管等进行了专题研讨；就全民免费医疗、儿童健康法治保障、三明医改经验进行研究和总结。
¥ 55.6 试读
-
-
珠海法治发展报告（No.4·2022） 收藏
吴轼 张强 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 王祎茗 副主编 2022年05月 出版
关键词： 粤港澳大湾区 珠海法治 横琴粤澳深度合作区 社会治理
简 介：本书全面梳理总结了2021年珠海法治实践的总体概况，并提出法治发展的未来目标：珠海将深入学习贯彻习近平法治思想，在法治政府、营商环境、社会治理、珠澳融合等方面开创新思路、新技术、新制度，增强大湾区司法互助互信，建立域内外多元解纷机制协同，增进港澳同胞民生福祉，以法治为核心价值观，助力珠海加快建设新时代中国特色社会主义现代化国际化经济特区，全力支持服务好横琴粤澳深度合作区建设。
¥ 55.6 试读
-
珠海法治发展报告（No.4·2022） 收藏
作者： 吴轼 张强 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 王祎茗 副主编 出版时间：2022年05月
关键词： 粤港澳大湾区 珠海法治 横琴粤澳深度合作区 社会治理
简 介：本书全面梳理总结了2021年珠海法治实践的总体概况，并提出法治发展的未来目标：珠海将深入学习贯彻习近平法治思想，在法治政府、营商环境、社会治理、珠澳融合等方面开创新思路、新技术、新制度，增强大湾区司法互助互信，建立域内外多元解纷机制协同，增进港澳同胞民生福祉，以法治为核心价值观，助力珠海加快建设新时代中国特色社会主义现代化国际化经济特区，全力支持服务好横琴粤澳深度合作区建设。
¥ 55.6 试读
-
-
-
-
-
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Judicial Big Data” in Chinese Courts （2019） 收藏
作者： 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 出版时间：2020年10月
关键词：
出处： Annual Report on Informatization of Chinese Courts No.4 (2020)
简 介：In 2019，courts at all levels paid close attention to data quality，ensured the accuracy and security of data，continuously improved data sharing，and deeply promoted judicial big data application，so as to provide support for serving social management innovation and strengthening smart management of the courts with judicial big data.
¥ 20.65 试读
-
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Smart Enforcement” in Chinese Courts （2019） 收藏
作者： 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 出版时间：2020年10月
关键词：
出处： Annual Report on Informatization of Chinese Courts No.4 (2020)
简 介：The year 2019 was the first year for the Outline of the Fifth Five-Year Reform Program of the People’s Courts （2019—2023） to be implemented，and also the first year for the newly revised Five-Year Plan for Information-Based Construction in People’s Courts （2019—2023） to put into effect. Besides，it also marked the turning point for the people’s courts to switch the goal from a basic solution to an effective solution to enforcement difficulties. An important policy decision and arrangement was clearly made at the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee that “enforcement difficulties shall be effectively solved” and that “the rights and interests of prevailing parties shall be guaranteed in a timely manner in accordance with law.” As far as the people’s courts are concerned，resolving the difficulties of enforcement is not an overnight solution，but a long-term systematic project. In March 2016，the Supreme People’s Court set the goal of “using two to three years to basically solve the enforcement difficulties”. After three years of unremitting efforts by the people’s courts across the country，as of the end of 2018，the people’s courts had undergone historic changes in enforcement and achieved leapfrog development. In this historical process，the information technology has played a vital role. In recent years，in the context of the national big data strategy，court informatization has progressed by leaps and bounds，promoting the reform of trial and enforcement mode and also alleviating to some extent the pressure of “few judges for many cases” in the people’s courts. Compared with the trial，the enforcement involves a vast geographic area and fragmented routine work，which provide a broader space for the information technology to play a role in. From inquiry and control of property subject to enforcement，handling and management of enforcement cases and a unified command of enforcement actions，to auction and disposition of property，joint credit discipline of dishonest judgment debtors and remote commissioning of enforcement matters，the information system has been playing a revolutionary role. It has not only improved the quality and efficiency of enforcement，but also reformed the system and mode of enforcement，and reshaped the ecological system of the enforcement in the people’s courts.
¥ 36.93 试读
-
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Smart Trial” in Chinese Courts （2019） 收藏
作者： 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 出版时间：2020年10月
关键词：
出处： Annual Report on Informatization of Chinese Courts No.4 (2020)
简 介：Trial is one of the core tasks of the people’s courts，and “smart trial” is the focus and challenge in court informatization. The report of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China stressed that “we should establish and improve the rules and regulations for administrative management by using Internet，big data，artificial intelligence and other technical means. We should build a digital government and strengthen data sharing in an orderly manner”. The people’s courts also need to improve the intelligence level in the trial. In 2019，the people’s courts made a lot of effective attempts and efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of trial，serve judges in handling cases，serve judicial assistants and establish online litigation rules. Relying on big data resources and by providing support for judges to inquire and refer to similar cases，the people’s courts have made efforts to ensure accurate ascertainment of facts and correct application of laws，and promote unification of judgment standards. The people’s courts have provided more intelligent services for judges in handling cases through digital judicial committees. By building an electronic file management system and interfacing with the case handling platform，they have effectively solved the file transferring difficulties. Furthermore，by assisting judges in reading files，producing documents，and examining and approving the circulation，the people’s courts have effectively improved trial efficiency and eased the pressure of trial.
¥ 26.87 试读
-
of Chinese Courts in and Outlook for 2020 收藏
作者： 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 出版时间：2020年10月
关键词：
出处： Annual Report on Informatization of Chinese Courts No.4 (2020)
简 介：The development of court informatization is a major initiative by the people’s courts to implement the strategy for invigorating China through the Internet. The people’s courts at all levels have firmly grasped the major historical opportunities brought about by the new round of scientific and technological revolution，such as invigorating China through the Internet and building a digital China and a smart society. The courts have made full use of big data，cloud computing，artificial intelligence and other modern scientific and technological means to solve reform problems，enhance judicial efficiency，and promote judicial reform and intelligence and informatization development of the people’s courts；and they have provided strong scientific and technological support to promote the modernization of the trial system and trial capacity.
¥ 36.26 试读
-
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Intelligent Litigation Service” of Chinese Courts （2018） 收藏
关键词：
出处： Annual Report on Informatization of Chinese Courts No.3 (2019)
简 介：Litigation service refers to a set of non-judicial working mechanisms and systems within the legal framework of procedural law，the law for the organization of people’s courts and other legal frameworks，in which relevant internal organs of the system of people’s courts facilitate litigants，lawyers and the public in the process of litigation and its extension. In recent years，the continuous development of the informatization of courts has created conditions for people’s courts to expand the concept of litigation service and improve the capability and level of that service. The concept of litigation service is the modern expression and sublimation of the people’s judicial tradition. Entering the 21st century，in order to meet the people’s demands for judicial transparency，standardization，high degree of efficiency and convenience，people’s courts have re-examined and attached importance to the service function and function of justice in terms of thoughts and concepts，and have begun to explore and create the court work and operational mode related to litigation service in the court systems in Beijing，Tianjin and other places，and have put forward the concept of “litigation service” from the perspective of practice. In February 2009，the Supreme People’s Court issued the Several Opinions on Further Strengthening the Work of Judicial Convenience，formally establishing the concept of “litigation service” and explicitly proposing that “the people’s courts shall establish a case-filing hall or litigation service center”. The concept of litigation service is the result of the increasing understanding of the socialist rule of law and judicial function by people’s courts with the development of the practice of rule of law. “Litigation Service” contains the concept of coordinating the relationship between judicial power，litigation rights and litigation subjects，which is the keynote of people’s courts in practicing justice for the people.
¥ 14.23 试读
