- TA的作品
- 作品笔记(0)
- 作品书评(0)
-
国际关系研究的历史路径 收藏
简 介:本书从历史学的视角来研究和理解国际关系问题,努力探寻历史与国际关系的互动与交融。从关注史学危机开始,到从历史看国关,再到探索国际关系史解读框架,求证历史学与国际关系学的关系,最后提出国际关系研究“历史路径”的必要性与可能性,作者始终围绕历史研究如何在国际关系的现实探索和理论构建中发挥作用这一线索展开讨论。
¥ 38.4 试读
-
公共外交研究(第1辑) 收藏
简 介:随着公共外交事业在我国的蓬勃发展,有关公共外交的学术研究也在不断走向深入,学者们围绕公共外交的理论与实践、他国公共外交的举措和经验,以及公共外交与国际前沿问题的关系,展开了热烈讨论。本书收集了部分中外学者近两年来的最新研究成果,以推进我国学界有关公共外交的学术探讨。希望本书能为专家学者研究公共外交提供学术交流平台,同时也能为广大公共外交的实践者提供大量有价值的信息,共同推进中国公共外交事业的进步。
¥ 38.7 试读
-
China and the World (Issue1·2015) 收藏
简 介:《中国与世界》是由吉林大学公共外交学院牵头围绕中国与世界关系历史性变化这一主线搭建的中国学者与世界各国同行之间交流与对话的平台,体现了中国与世界之间的互动、磨合、交融和精彩。本书是第1辑,内容涉及以下内容:软实力关系内涵、中国与美国软实力国际形象比较、流行文化对美国公共外交的影响分析、中国的未来与未来世界中的中国、国内政策如何影响周边区域合作、非洲的经济复兴与尼日利亚的未来——中国的经济参与等等。
¥ 69 试读
-
国际关系研究的历史路径 收藏
简 介:本书从历史学的视角来研究和理解国际关系问题,努力探寻历史与国际关系的互动与交融。从关注史学危机开始,到从历史看国关,再到探索国际关系史解读框架,求证历史学与国际关系学的关系,最后提出国际关系研究“历史路径”的必要性与可能性,作者始终围绕历史研究如何在国际关系的现实探索和理论构建中发挥作用这一线索展开讨论。
¥ 38.4 试读
-
公共外交研究(第1辑) 收藏
简 介:随着公共外交事业在我国的蓬勃发展,有关公共外交的学术研究也在不断走向深入,学者们围绕公共外交的理论与实践、他国公共外交的举措和经验,以及公共外交与国际前沿问题的关系,展开了热烈讨论。本书收集了部分中外学者近两年来的最新研究成果,以推进我国学界有关公共外交的学术探讨。希望本书能为专家学者研究公共外交提供学术交流平台,同时也能为广大公共外交的实践者提供大量有价值的信息,共同推进中国公共外交事业的进步。
¥ 38.7 试读
-
China and the World (Issue1·2015) 收藏
简 介:《中国与世界》是由吉林大学公共外交学院牵头围绕中国与世界关系历史性变化这一主线搭建的中国学者与世界各国同行之间交流与对话的平台,体现了中国与世界之间的互动、磨合、交融和精彩。本书是第1辑,内容涉及以下内容:软实力关系内涵、中国与美国软实力国际形象比较、流行文化对美国公共外交的影响分析、中国的未来与未来世界中的中国、国内政策如何影响周边区域合作、非洲的经济复兴与尼日利亚的未来——中国的经济参与等等。
¥ 20.7 试读
-
中国叙事、公共外交与时代博弈 收藏
出处: 公共外交研究(第1辑)
简 介:中共十九大的召开,“习近平新时代”的开始和“构建新型国际关系”、“人类命运共同体”新理念的提出,标志着中国以一种新的充满自信的领袖国家身份伫立在世界舞台上,中国的公共外交也承担起了更为重大的责任。这就是在直面西方中国政治叙事的同时,加快构建中国的中国叙事体系,并在中国特色大国外交与“不确定的世界”之间,在“构建新型国际关系”、“人类命运共同体”新理念与“冷战思维”的两种时代博弈中占据上风。归根结底,中国的公共外交需要向世界说明中国是一个什么样的国家。中国的改革性、开放性、全球化、超大规模和社会主义特性决定了中国从“独善其身”到“兼济天下”的必然发展,也决定了中国引导世界走出“不确定”状态的责任和动力。
¥ 5.39 试读
-
Hu Shi’s Study of Force and Legitimacy 收藏
关键词:
出处: China and the World (Issue1·2015)
简 介:Hu Shi was one of the most prominent intellectuals and social activists in 20-century China. Yet,he never confined his role to the intelligentsia. Prominent in his career in public service was an ambassadorship to the United States during 1937~1942. Even before that,he took considerable interest in the dynamics of Far Eastern international politics. Characteristically,his views on international politics were deeply informed by Wilsonianism. Hu’s Wilsonian view of international relations exhibited certain consistency throughout his articulation of changing world conditions during 1931~1946. Nationalist China’s fall in the Far Eastern international politics eventually left his Wilsonianism irrelevant to the statecraft for Chinese national security. Nevertheless,the Wilsonian principles carry far-reaching implications for modern Chinese diplomatic thinking and practices,not the least of which being the dialectics between force and legitimacy. Hu’s views of international politics from 1931 to 1946 deserve a reexamination.
¥ 5.24 试读
-
The Role of SCO in China’s Changing Posture towards Afghanistan 收藏
关键词:
出处: China and the World (Issue1·2015)
简 介:In December 2014 the United States and NATO forces concluded their longest ever mission in Afghanistan without securing their stated objective of bringing peace and stability and introducing the concept of Westphalian democracy to Afghanistan. After a decade-long and expensive “war on terror”,Afghanistan is,at least,as insecure internally and externally as it was before the start of war in 2001. Afghanistan mayhem imposed huge direct and indirect cost on the U.S. and its allies and has adversely affected all the neighboring states. Despite all efforts,Afghanistan remains a threat to global security and regional prosperity. The uncertain future of Afghanistan in increasingly dynamic geo-strategic environment and rebalancing economic and political power from Europe to Asia require regional actors and neighboring states to recalibrate their policies towards the end of realizing a stable Afghanistan. Otherwise,a failed Afghanistan could have long lasting serious repercussions for the region and beyond.
¥ 4.79 试读
-
China’s Energy Cooperation with Russia in the Wake of the Ukraine Crisis 收藏
关键词:
出处: China and the World (Issue1·2015)
简 介:The ongoing crisis in Ukraine marks a watershed in post-Cold War international geopolitics. Its ramifications extend far beyond the European context and can be felt in Asia as well. As Moscow’s relations with the West have rapidly entered a new ice age,its ties with its most important international partner,the People’s Republic of China,have gained unprecedented importance. Russia’s President Vladimir Putin has not shied away from isolating his country from the West both politically and economically. In so doing,the Kremlin has been banking on the belief that many of the lost ties with other emerging powers—above all with China—can be reforged. For the Russian decision-makers,an important precondition for their willingness to risk an open confrontation with the West has been the conviction that much of the ensuing fallout—particularly on the economic front—can be buffered by intensifying cooperation with Beijing.
¥ 4.88 试读
-
Why States Need Peaceful Coexistence? 收藏
关键词:
出处: China and the World (Issue1·2015)
简 介:China,along with India and Myanmar,proposed the five principles of peaceful coexistence (in India,they were called “Panchsheel” or “PanchaShila”) and established them as a part of international law in 1954. They were then accepted regionally and more generally in international relations. The five principles are:mutual respect for sovereignty and territorial integrity,mutual non-aggression,non-interference in each other’s internal affairs,equality and mutual benefit,and peaceful coexistence. Premier Zhou Enlai first set them forth in his talk to the Indian delegation at the start of the negotiations that took place in Beijing from December 1953 to April 1954 between representatives of the Chinese and Indian governments on relations between the two countries in Tibet. They were formally written into an international legal instrument in 1954,in the Agreement between the Government of the People’s Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of India on Trade and Inter-course between Tibet Region of China and India:
¥ 4.32 试读