首页 > 图书详情

汉语问题性照应语研究 哲学类;语言类;专著;汉语语法 VIP

售价:¥53.72 ¥79
0人在读 |
0 评分
丛书名:
陈琳琳   社会科学文献出版社  2019-01 出版
ISBN:978-7-5201-3969-4

*温馨提示:此类商品为数字类产品,不支持退换货,不支持下载打印

图书简介 目录 参考文献 音频 视频
本书系统介绍作为问题性照应语典型代表的“驴子句”现象的提出及解决方案,在对接现有汉语驴子句典型句型的基础上,构造适用于处理汉语驴子句的DRT框架,并在此框架下给出语义处理方案。随着人工智能的快速发展,信息的可被计算性需求越来越大,信息处理的准确性要求越来越高。而自然语言的灵活性、丰富性、模糊性等特点,使得自然语言的信息处理要面临诸多挑战。自DRT框架开始的动态语义理论发展正是应对这些挑战的产物,而理论的不断更新发展为自然语言的信息处理提供了逐步实现的保障。
[展开]
  • 摘要
  • 第一章 导论
    1. 第一节 选题背景及意义
    2. 第二节 研究现状
    3. 第三节 本书结构及写作思路
  • 第二章 DRT对英语驴子句的处理
    1. 第一节 DRT的句法规则
    2. 第二节 话语表现结构DRS
    3. 第三节 DRS在模型中的解释
    4. 第四节 DRT对英语驴子句的处理
  • 第三章 汉语驴子句的界定
    1. 第一节 条件句驴子句
    2. 第二节 关系句驴子句
    3. 第三节 类指隐性驴子句
    4. 第四节 汉语驴子句小结与再考察
  • 第四章 基于DRT框架的汉语驴子句处理
    1. 第一节 DRT的句法规则
    2. 第二节 DRT的话语表现结构
    3. 第三节 DRS在模型中的解释
    4. 第四节 DRT对汉语驴子句的处理
    5. 第五节 小结
  • 第五章 与驴子句相关的其他问题
    1. 第一节 驴子照应语的读法问题
    2. 第二节 驴子照应语的复数情况
    3. 第三节 不同汉语驴子句句型的真值条件再考察
  • 第六章 结语
[1]陈平,1991,《现代语言学研究:理论、方法与事实》,重庆出版社。 [2]高原,2003,《照应词的认知分析》,外语教学与研究出版社。 [3]黎锦熙,2001,《新著国语文法》,科学出版社。 [4]吕叔湘,1980,《现代汉语八百词》,商务印书馆。 [5]王力,1985,《中国现代语法》,商务印书馆。 [6]徐国庆,1999,《现代汉语词汇系统论》,商务印书馆。 [7]邹崇理,1995,《逻辑、语言和蒙太格语法》,社会科学文献出版社。 [8]邹崇理,2000,《自然语言逻辑研究》,北京大学出版社。 [9]邹崇理,2002,《逻辑、语言和信息——逻辑语法研究》,人民出版社。 [10]朱德熙,1982,《语法讲义》,商务印书馆。 [11]Asher,N. and Wang,L..2003.“Ambiguity and Anaphora with Plurals in Discourse.”In Proceedings of SALT XIII,edited by R. Young & Y. Zhou,pp.19-36.Ithaca:CLC Publications. [12]Barwise,J.&Perry,J. 1983.Situations and Attitudes. Mass:MIT Press. [13]Chierchia,Gennaro.1995.Dynamics of Meaning:Anaphora,Presupposition,and the Theory of Grammar.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [14]Chierchia,Gennaro.2001.“A Puzzle about Indefinites.”In Semantic Interfaces:Reference,Anaphora and Aspect,edited by C.Cecchetto,G.Chierchia & M.T.Guasti,pp.51-89.Stanford:CSLI Publications. [15]Cohen,A..1999.Think Generic:The Meaning and Use of Generic Sentences. Stanford:CSLI Publications. [16]Cooper,R.. 1979.“The Interpretation of Pronouns.”In The Nature of Syntactic Representations,Syntax and Semantics,edited by F. Henry & H. Schnelle.New York:Academic Press. [17]Elbourne,Paul.2001.“On the Semantics of Pronouns and Definite Articles.”In Proceedings of WCCFL 20,edited by K.Megerdoomian and L.A.Bar-el,pp.164-177.Mass:Cascadilla Press. [18]Geach,P.T..1962.Reference and Generality.NY:Cornell University Press. [19]Geurts,B..1999. Presuppositions and Pronouns,Current Research in the Semantics/PragmaticsInterface(Vol. 3). London:Elsevier. [20]Gupta,A.K..1980.The Logic of Common Nouns.New Haven:Yale University Press. [21]Grice,P..1989.Studies in the Way of Words.MA:Harvard University Press. [22]Groenendijk,J. and Stokhof,M.. 1991. Dynamic Predicate Logic. Linguistics and Philosophy . [23]Heim,I. .1983.“File Change Semantics and the Familiarity Theory of Dfiniteness.” In R.,Bauerle.and R,Schwarze. & von,Stechow,Meaniong,Use and Interpretation of Language,pp.164-189.Berlin:Walter de Gruyter. [24]Heim,I .& Krazter.1998.Semantics in Generative Grammar.Massachusetts:Blackwell. [25]Jiang,Y.& Pan,Haihua & Zou,C..1997.“On the Semantic Content of Noun Phrases.”In Xu. L.-J,The Referential Properties of Chinese Noun Phrases,pp.3-24.Paris:Ecole Des Hautes en Sciences Sociales. [26]Kamp,Hans & Genabith,J.& Uwe Reyle.2011.“Discourse Rrepresentation Theory.”Handbook of Philosophical Logic,2nd Edition,pp.125-394.Germany:Springer. [27]Kamp,Hans & Reyle,Uwe.1993.From Discourse to Logic:Introduction to Model-theoretic Semantics of Natural Language,Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory.Dordrecht:Kluwer. [28]Kamp,H..2001.“The Importance of Presupposition.”In Liguistic Form and Its Computation,edited by Christian Rohrer,Antje Rossdeutscher,Hans Kamp.Standord:CSLI-Publications. [29]Karen,Van Hoek.1997.Anaphora and Conceptual Structure.Chicago:University of Chicago Press. [30]King,Jeffrey C..2001.Complex Demonstratives:A Quantificational Account. Cambridge:MIT Press. [31]King,Jeffrey C..2004.“Context Dependent Quantifiers and Donkey Anaphora.”In Supplement to Canadian Journal of Philosophy,edited by M. Ezcurdia,R.Stainton and C.Viger,pp.97-127.Canada:University of Calgary Press. [32]Kratzer,Angelika. 1989.“Individual-level vs. Stage-level Predicates.”Papers on Quantification,University of Massachusetts,Amherst. [33]Krifka,M..1996.“Pragmatic Strengthening in Plural Predications and Donkey Sentences.”In Proceedings from SALT VI,edited by T.Galloway & J.Spence,pp.136-153.Ithaca:CLC Publications. [34]Krifka,M. & Pelletier,F. & Carlson,G. & Meulen,A.& Link,G. & Chierchia,G..1995. “Genericity:An introduction.” In Carlson,G. & Pelletier,F,The generic book. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [35]Larson,Richard and Segal,Gabriel.1995. Knowledge of Meaning. Cambridge:MIT Press. [36]Lawler,J..1973. Studies in English Generics.Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press. [37]Lewis,D. .1975.“Adverbs of Quantification.” In Edward Keenan,Formal Semantics of Natural Language,pp.3-15.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [38]Nagel,E..1961.The Structure of Science;Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation.New York:Harcourt,Brace & World. [39]Neale,Stephen. 1990.Descriptions. MIT Press. [40]Platteau,F..1980.“Definite and Indefinite Generics.”In J.van der Auwera,Semantics of Determiners.London:Croom Helm. [41]Putnam,H..1970.“Is Semantic Possible? ”In H.E.Kiefer & M.k. Munitz,Language,Belief and Metaphysics.New York:State University of New York Press. [42]Putnam,H..1975.“The Meaning of Meaning.”In K.Gunderson,Language,Mind and Knowledge.Minneapolis:University of Minnesota Press. [43]Safir,Ken. 1985.Synractic Chains. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [44]Thrane,T..1980.Referential-semantic Analysis:Aspects of A Theory of Linguistics.Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [45]Van Benthem & ter Meulen. 1985.Generalized Quantifiers in Natural Language. GRASS Series 4. Dordrecht:Foris. [46]Van Eijck,Jan and Kamp,Hans.1997.“Representing Discourse in Context.”In Handbook of Logic and Language,edited by van Benthem,ter Meulen.Cambridge:The MIT Press. [47]Williamson,T..2000.Knowledge and Its Limits.Oxford:Oxford University Press. [48]谌志群、周昌乐、郑洪,1998,《汉语语篇中人称指代消歧研究》,《江西师范大学学报》(自然科学版)增刊。 [49]高顺全,2004,《试论汉语通指的表达方式》,《语言教学与研究》第3期。 [50]高彦梅,2003,《代词衔接功能的认知研究》,《外语学刊》第1期。 [51]胡松柏,1998,《现代汉语疑问代词叠用式》,《厦门大学学报》(哲学社会科学版)第1期。 [52]廖秋忠,1986,《现代汉语篇章中指同的表达》,《中国语文》第2期。 [53]刘礼进,1997,《英汉人称代词回指和预指比较研究》,《外国语(上海外国语大学学报)》第6期。 [54]刘礼进,2003,《英汉第三人称代词后照应的几个问题——与赵宏、邵志洪先生商榷》,《外国语言文学》第1期。 [55]刘新文,2002,《系统z的量化扩张及其对话语表现理论的处理》,博士学位论文,中国社会科学院。 [56]吕叔湘,1992,《试论含有同一“一N”两次出现前后呼应的句子的语义类型》,《中国语文》第4期。 [57]马彦华、王能忠、许敏,1998,《汉语中人称代词指代问题研究》,《中文信息处理国际会议论文集》,清华大学出版社。 [58]潘海华,1996,《篇章表述理论概说》,《国外语言学》第3期。 [59]秦洪武,2001,《第三人称代词在深层回指中的应用分析》,《当代语言学》第1期。 [60]邵敬敏、赵秀凤,1989,《“什么”非疑问用法研究》,《语言教学与研究》第1期。 [61]石毓智,1997,《指示代词回指的两种语序及其功能》,《汉语学习》第6期。 [62]王灿龙,1999,《现代汉语照应系统研究》,博士学位论文,中国社会科学院。 [63]王灿龙,2000,《人称代词“他”的照应功能研究》,《中国语文》第3期。 [64]王广成,2005,《三分结构与两种条件句式》,北京语言大学报告。 [65]王晓斌、周昌乐,2004,《基于语篇表述理论的汉语人称代词的消解研究》,《厦门大学学报》(自然科学版)第1期。 [66]王欣,2007,《关于驴子句的几点疑问与思考》,《语文学刊》(高教外文版)第2期。 [67]王志,1998,《篇章代词“它”用法探析》,《世界汉语教学》第3期。 [68]温宾利,1997,《英语的“驴句”与汉语的“什么…什么句”》,《现代外语》第3期。 [69]温宾利,1998,《“什么…什么句”:一种关系结构》,《现代外语》第4期。 [70]文卫平,2006,《英汉驴子句研究》,博士学位论文,北京语言大学。 [71]许余龙,2002,《语篇回指的认知语言学探索》,《外国语(上海外国语大学学报)》第1期。 [72]许余龙,2003,《语篇回指的认知语言学研究与验证》,《外国语(上海外国语大学学报)》第2期。 [73]杨彩梅,2003,《“Dep 结构”的λ提取与可追踪性原则》,《现代外语》第3期。 [74]杨若东,1997,《认知推理与语篇回指代词指代的确定——兼论形式解决方法之不足》,《外国语(上海外国语大学学报)》第2期。 [75]于细良,1965,《疑问代词的任指用法》,《中国语文》第1期。 [76]张威、周昌乐,2002,《汉语语篇理解中元指代消解初步》,《软件学报》第3期。 [77]赵虹、邵志清,2002,《英汉第三人称代词语篇照应功能对比研究》,《外语教学与研究》第3期。 [78]邹崇理,1998,《话语表现理论述评》,《当代语言学》第4期。 [79]邹崇理,2003,《刻画量化结构及其推理的汉语部分语句系统》,《西南师范大学学报》(人文社科版)第3期。 [80]邹崇理、李可胜,2009,《逻辑和语言研究的交叉互动》,《西南大学学报》(社会科学版)第3期。 [81]Abbott,Barabara.2002.“Donkey Demonstratives.”Natural Language Semantics 10:285-298. [82]Abusch,D..1994.“The Scope of Indefinites.”Natural Language Semantics 2:83-135. [83]Barker,C..1996.“Presuppositions for Proportional Quantifiers.”Natural Language Semantics 4:237-259. [84]Barker,S.J..1997.“E-type Pronouns,DRT,Dynamic Semantics and the Quantifier/Variable-Binding Model.”Linguistics and Philosophy 20:195-228. [85]Barwise,Jon & Cooper,Robin.1981.“Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language.”Linguistics and Philosophy 4:159-219. [86]Brasoveanu,Adrian.2008.“Donkey Pluralities:Plural Information States Versus Non-atomic Individuals.”Linguist and Philos 31:129-209. [87]Burge,Tyler.1974.“Demonstrative Constructions,Reference,and Truth.”Journal of Philosophy 71:205-223. [88]Cheng,Lisa L.-S & Huang,C-T.James.1996.“Two Types of Donkey Sentences.”Natural Language Semantics 4:121-163. [89]Cheng,Lisa L.-S..1991.“On the Typology of Wh-questions.”dissertation,MIT. [90]Cheng,Lisa L.-S. & Huang,C.-T. James.1996.“Two Types of Donkey Sentences.”Natural Language Semantics 4:121-163. [91]Chierchia,G..1992.“Anaphora and Dynamic Binding.”Linguistics and Philosophy 15:11-183. [92]Chierchia,G..2009.“Chinese Conditional and the Theory of Conditionals.”Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1:1-54. [93]Declerk,R..1986.“The Manifold Interpretation of Generic Sentences.”Lingua 68:149-188. [94]Declerk,R..1991.“The Origins of Genericity.”Linguistics 29:79-101. [95]Donnellan,Keith S..1966.“Reference and Definite Descriptions.”Philosophical Review 77:281-304. [96]Elbourne,Paul.2001.“E-type Anaphora as NP-Deletion.”Natural Language Semantics 9:241-288. [97]Elworthy,D..1995.“A Theory of Anaphoric Information.”Linguistics and Philosophy 18:297-332. [98]Evans,Gareth. 1977.“Pronouns,Quantifiers and Relative Clauses ” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 3:467-536. [99]Evans,G..1980.“Pronouns.”Linguistic Inquiry 11:337-362. [100]Geurts,Bart. 2002.“Donkey Business.”Linguisticss and Philosophy 25:129-156. [101]Heim,I..1982.“The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases.”dissertation,University of Massachusetts. [102]Heim,I..1990.“E-type Pronouns and Donkey Anaphora.”Linguistics and Philosophy 13:137-178. [103]Heim,I. .2011.“The Semantics of Definite and Indefinite Noun Phrases. ”Ph.D.diss.,University of Massachusetts. [104]Hess,M.. 1989. “Genericness and implicit quantification in discourse presentation theory.”Conference on Cross-linguistics quantification,1989 Summer Institute of Linguistics. Tucson,AZ,USA. [105]Hess,M.. 1989. “Reference and Quantification in Discourse.”University of Zurich Habilitation Thesis. [106]Heyer,G..1985.“Generic Descriptions,Default Reasoning and Typicality.”Theoreical Linguistics 12:33-72. [107]Heyer,G..1990.“Semantic and Knowledge Representation in the Analysis of Generic Descriptions.”Journal of Semantics 7:93-110. [108]Huang,Aijun.2003.“A DR-theoretical account of Chinese Donkey Anaphora.”dissertation,University of Hunan Normal. [109]Kadmon,N..1990.“Uniqueness.”Linguistics and Philosophy 13:273-324. [110]Kamp,Hans. 1981.“A Theory of Truth and Semantic Representation.”In Formal Methods in the Study of Language,edited by J. Groenendijk,T. Janssen,and M. Stokhof. Amsterdam:Mathematical Center. [111]Kanazawa,Makoto.1994.“Weak vs. Strong Readings of Donkey Sentences and Monotonicity Inference in a Dynamic Setting.”Linguistics and Philosophy 17:109-158. [112]Kanazawa,Makoto.2001.“Singular Donkey Pronouns Are Semantically Singular.”Linguistics and Philosophy 24:383-403. [113]King,Jeffrey C..1987.“Pronouns,Descriptions and the Semantics of Discourse. ”Philosophical Studie 51:341-363. [114]King,Jeffrey C..1991.“Instantial Terms,Anaphora and Arbitrary Objects.” Philosophical Studies 61:239-265. [115]King,Jeffrey C..1994.“Anaphora and Operators. ”Philosophical Perspectives 8. [116]Kratzer,A.. 1981. “Blurred Conditionals. ”In Crossing the Boundaries in Linguistics,edited by Klein,W. and Levelt,W.,pp. 201-209. [117]Kratzer,A. 1981. ‘The Notional Category of Modality’. In Words,Worlds,and Contexts,New Approaches to Word Semantics,edited by Eikmeyer,H.-J. and Rieser,H.,pp.38-74.Berlin:Walter de Gruyter. [118]Krifka,M..1996.“Parametric Sum Individuals for Plural Anaphora.”Linguistics and Philosophy 19:555-598. [119]Kroll,Nicky.2008.“On Bishops and Donkeys.”Nat Lang Semantics 16:359-372. [120]Lappin,Shalom.1989.“Donkey Pronouns Unbound.”Theoretical Linguistics 15:263-286. [121]Lappin,Shalom and Francez,Nissim.1994.“E-type Pronouns,I-sums,and Donkey Anaphora.”Linguistics and Philosophy 17:391-428. [122]Lin,Jo-wang. 1996.“Polarity Licensing and Wh-phrase Quantification in Chinese.”Ph. D diss,University of Massachusetts. [123]Lin,Jo-wang. 1998.“On Existential Polarity Wh-phrases in Chinese.” Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7:219-255. [124]McCarthy,J..1980.“Cirumscription:A form of non-monotonic reasoning. ”Artificial Intelligence 13:41-72. [125]McCarthy,J..1986.“Applications of circumscription to formalizing common sense knowledge. ”Artificial Intelligence 28:27-39. [126]Ning,C. Y..1993.“The Overt Syntax of Relativization and Topicalization in Chinese.”Ph. D diss,University of California. [127]Ning,C.Y..1996,“De as a Functional Head in Chinese.”Working Paper in Linguistics,University of Clifornia. [128]Nouwen,R..2003.“Plural Pronominal Anaphora in Context.”dissertation,University of Utrecht. [129]Pan,Haihua & Jiang,yan.1997.“NP Interpretation and Chinese Donkey Sentences.”Summer Institute of Linguistics of the Society of America.Cornell Universtiy. [130]Pelletier,F.J.& Schubert,L.K..1989.“Generically Speaking or Using Discourse Representation Theory to Interpret Generics.” Properties,Types and Meanings 2:193-268. [131]Roberts,C..2003.“Uniqueness in Definite Noun Phrases.”Linguistics and Philosophy 26:287-350. [132]Sandt,R.v.d..1992.“Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution.”Journal of Semantics 9:333-377. [133]Saurer,W.. 1993.“A Natural Deduction System for Discourse Representation Theory. ”Journal of Philosophical Logic 22:249. [134]Schwarzschild,R..1992.“Types of Plural Individuals.”Linguistics and Philosophy 15:641-675. [135]Van der Sandt,R..1992.“Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution.”Journal of Semantics 9:333-377. [136]Wilson,George.1984.“Pronouns and Pronomial Descriptions:A New Semantical Category.”Philosophical Studies 45:1-30. [137]Winter,Y..2000.“Distributivity and Dependency.”Natural Language Semantics 8:27-69.
[展开]

相关推荐

发表评论

同步转发到先晓茶馆

发表评论

手机可扫码阅读