首页 > 图书详情

社会及行为科学研究法(二)·质性研究法 特藏书;社会学;社会学理论 VIP

售价:¥44.25 ¥59
0人在读 |
0 评分
丛书名:
瞿海源 毕恒达 刘长萱   社会科学文献出版社  2013-07 出版
ISBN:978-7-5097-4583-0

*温馨提示:此类商品为数字类产品,不支持退换货,不支持下载打印

图书简介 目录 参考文献 音频 视频
本书书名为《社会及行为科学研究法?质性研究法》,也就是主要讲述质性研究方法。除了经典的人类学田野调查法,本书还介绍了扎根理论、个案延伸法、历史研究法、访谈法、叙事分析、论述分析等,并举文献作为例子进行说明同事在编排上,本书穿插很多“参考方块”,加深读者对方法的理解。本书是社会科学研究者的常备书,适合政治学、教育学、社会学、人类学等学科师生使用。
[展开]
  • 社会及行为科学研究法
  • 序言
  • 总目次
  • 第一章 人类学田野工作
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 人类学的田野工作
    3. 三 人类学家与被研究者之间的不平等关系
    4. 四 总结
    5. 延伸阅读
  • 第二章 访谈法
    1. 一 前言:挖矿与旅行
    2. 二 质性访谈的研究设计
    3. 三 进入访谈现场
    4. 四 从对话到文本:记录、誊写与分析
    5. 五 总结
    6. 延伸阅读
  • 第三章 质性个案研究:扎根理论与延伸个案法
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 扎根理论
    3. 三 延伸个案法
    4. 四 建构主义的扎根理论
    5. 五 总结
    6. 延伸阅读
  • 第四章 论述分析
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 论述分析的定义和理论预设
    3. 三 论述与社群
    4. 四 口语和书写的论述分析
    5. 五 论述分析的不同取径
    6. 六 总结
    7. 延伸阅读
  • 第五章 叙事分析
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 叙事的转向与叙事研究发展
    3. 三 叙事分析与质性研究
    4. 四 叙事与时间
    5. 五 叙事与认同
    6. 六 叙事与文化
    7. 七 总结
    8. 延伸阅读
  • 第六章 历史研究法
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 什么是历史社会学?
    3. 三 巨视结构比较分析
    4. 四 历史社会学的辩论与转向
    5. 五 事件、叙事与因果解释:研究实作说明
    6. 六 总结
    7. 延伸阅读
  • 第七章 跨学科的历史研究法
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 社会科学与历史的分家
    3. 三 社会科学与历史叙事的结合
    4. 四 总结:解释愈多,理解愈深
    5. 延伸阅读
  • 第八章 个案研究
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 个案的方法论基础
    3. 三 选择个案的策略
    4. 四 理论与个案的搭配
    5. 五 证据搜集、分析与呈现
    6. 六 总结
    7. 延伸阅读
  • 第九章 内容及文本内容分析
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 当代语言学的发展和影响
    3. 三 内容分析
    4. 四 文本论述分析
    5. 五 文本内容分析
    6. 六 总结
    7. 延伸阅读
  • 第十章 建制民族志:为弱势者发声的研究取径
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 建制民族志的核心观念
    3. 三 建制民族志的步骤
    4. 四 建制民族志的资料收集方法
    5. 五 建制民族志在方法论上的几点提醒
    6. 六 建制民族志的研究实例:Roxana Ng的移民妇女就业服务
    7. 七 总结
    8. 延伸阅读
  • 第十一章 质性资料分析软件
    1. 一 前言
    2. 二 质性资料分析软件和传统质性资料分析方式的比较
    3. 三 主要质性资料分析软件的介绍和使用
    4. 四 如何用质性资料分析软件分析资料
    5. 五 如何选择质性资料分析软件
    6. 六 总结
    7. 延伸阅读
  • 索引
  • 人名索引
[1]何翠萍(1999)《从中国少数民族研究的几个个案谈“己”与“异己”的关系》,徐正光、黄应贵(编)《人类学在台湾的发展:回顾与展望篇》(页357~404),台北:中研院民族学研究所。 [2]黄瑞祺、罗晓南(编)(2005)《人文社会科学的逻辑》,台北:松慧有限公司。 [3]黄应贵(1994)《从田野工作谈人类学家与被研究者的关系》,《山海文化双月刊》,6,18~26。 [4]黄应贵(2008)《反景入深林:人类学的观照、理论与实践》,台北:三民书局。 [5]黄应贵(2009)《总论》,黄应贵(编)《空间与文化场域:空间之意象、实践与社会的生产》(页iii-x),台北:汉学研究中心。 [6]凌纯声(1934/1991)《松花江下游的赫哲族》,台北:中研院历史语言研究所。 [7]王崧兴(1967)《龟山岛:汉人渔村社会之研究》,台北:中研院民族学研究所。 [8]Ardener,Edwin(1972). Belief and the problem of women. In Jean Sybil La Fontaine(Ed.),The interpretation of ritual(pp.135-158). London:Tavistock. [9]Asad,Talad(Ed.)(1975a). Anthropology and the colonial encounter. London:Ithaca Press. [10]Asad,Talad(1975b). Two European’s images of non-European rule. In Talad Asad(Ed.),Anthropology and the colonial encounter(pp.103-118). London:Ithaca Press. [11]Asad,Talad(1975c). Introduction. In Talad Asad(Ed.),Anthropology and the colonial encounter(pp.1-19). London:Ithaca Press. [12]Beattie,John(1964). Other cultures:Aims,methods,and achievements in social anthropology. New York:Free Press. [13]Bernard,H. Rusell(2006). Research methods in anthropology:Qualitative and quantitative approaches(4th ed.). Lanham:AltaMira Press. [14]Bourdieu,Pierre(1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [15]Bourdieu,Pierre(1990). The logic of practice. Stanford,Calif.:Stanford University Press. [16]Cassell,Joan,& Wax,Murry L.(1980). Toward a moral science of human beings. Social Problems,27(3),251-264. [17]Castells,Manuel(1997/2002)《认同的力量》(The power of identity)(夏铸九、黄丽玲等译),台北:唐山出版社。 [18]Castells,Manuel(2000)《网络社会之崛起》(The rise of the network society)(夏铸九、王志弘等译),台北:唐山出版社。 [19]Cesara,Manda(1982). Reflections of a woman anthropologist:No hiding place. London:Academic Press. [20]Classen,Constance(1993). Worlds of sense:Exploring the senses in history and across cultures. London:Routledge. [21]Clifford,James(1986). Introduction:Partial truths. In James Clifford & George E.Marcus(Eds.),Writing culture:The poetics and politics of ethnography(pp.1-26). Berkeley:University of California Press. [22]Clifford,James(1988a). Power and dialogue in ethnography:Marcel Griaule’s initiation. In James Clifford,The predicament of culture:Twentieth-century ethnography,literature,and art(pp.55-91). Cambridge,Mass.:Harvard University Press. [23]Clifford,James(1988b). On ethnographic authority. In James Clifford,The predicament of culture:Twentieth-century ethnography,literature,and art(pp.21-54). [24]Duara,Prasenjit(2003). Sovereignty and authenticity:Manchukuo and the East Asian modern. Lanham:Rowman & Littlefield Publishers. [25]Edgar,Iain R.(2004). Guide to imagework:Imagination-based research methods. London:Routledge. [26]Epstein,Anne L.(Ed.)(1967). The craft of social anthropology. London:Tavistock. [27]Evans-Pritchard,Edward E.(1951). Kinship and marriage among the Nuer. Oxford:Oxford University Press. [28]Falzon,Mark-Anthony(Ed.)(2009). Multi-sited ethnography:Theory,praxis and locality in contemporary research. Surrey:Ashgate Publishing Limited. [29]Fardon,Richard(1990a). Localizing strategies:The regionalization of ethnographic accounts. In Richard Fardon(Ed.),Localizing strategies:Regional traditions of ethnographic writing(pp.1-35). Edinburgh:Scottish Academic Press. [30]Fardon,Richard(1990b). Malinowski’s precedent:The imagination of equality. Man (N.S.),25(4),561-587. [31]Forster,Peter(1975). A review of the new left critique of social anthropology. In Talad Asad(Ed.),Anthropology and the colonial encounter(pp.23-38). [32]Fox,Robin(1967). Kinship and marriage:An anthropological perspective. Harmondsworth:Penguin Books. [33]Freeman,Derek(1984). Margaret Mead and Samoa:The making and unmaking of an anthropological myth. Middlesex:Penguin. [34]Geertz,Hildred,& Geertz,Clifford(1954). Teknonymy in Bali. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute,94(2),94-108. [35]Geertz,Hildred,& Geertz,Clifford(1975). Kinship in Bali. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [36]Gell,Afred(1995). The language of the forest:Landscape and phonological iconism in Umeda. In Eric Hirch & Michael O’Hanlon(Eds.),The anthropology of landscape:Perspectives on place and space(pp.232-254). Oxford:Clarendon Press. [37]Gingrich,Andre,& Fox,Richard G.(Eds.)(2002). Anthropology,by comparison. London:Routledge. [38]Golde,Peggy(Ed.)(1986). Women in the field:Anthropological experiences. Berkeley:University of California Press. [39]Gregor,Thomas A.,& Tuzin,Donald(Eds.)(2001). Gender in Amazonia and Melanesia:An exploration of the comparative method. Berkeley:University of California Press. [40]Harvey,David(1989). The condition of postmodernity. Oxford:Basil Blackwell. [41]Hertz,Robert(1960). Death and the right hand. Glencoe:Free Press. [42]Holy,Ladislav(Ed.)(1987). Comparative anthropology. Oxford:Basil Blackwell. [43]Hymes,Dell(1974). The use of anthropology:Critical,political,personal. In Dell Hymes(Ed.),Reinventing anthropology(pp.3-79). New York:Vintage Books. [44]James,Wendy(1975). The anthropologist as relevant imperialist. In Talad Asad(Ed.),Anthropology and the colonial encounter(pp.41-69). [45]Keesing,Roger M.(1975). Kin groups and social structure. New York:Holt,Rinehart and Winston. [46]Keesing,Roger M.,& Keesing,Felix M.(1971). New perspectives in cultural anthropology. New York:Holt,Rinehart and Winston. [47]Kuper,Adam(1980). The man in the study and the man in the field:Ethnography,theory and comparison in social anthropology. European Journal of Sociology,21(1),14-19. [48]Levin,David Michael(Ed.)(1993). Modernity and the hegemony of vision. Berkeley:University of California Press. [49]Lévi-Struass,Claude(1976). The scope of anthropology. In Claude Lévi-Strauss,Structural anthropology(Vol. II,pp.3-32). Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [50]Lewis,Ioan M.(1968). Comment to Current Anthropology social responsibility symposium. Current Anthropology,9,415-417. [51]Lewis,Oscar(1951). Life in a Mexican village:Tepoztlan restudied. Urbana:University of Illinois Press. [52]Li,An-che(1968). Zuni:Some observations and queries. In Robert A. Manners & David Kaplan(Eds.),Theory in anthropology:A sourcebook(pp.136-144). Chicago:Aldine Publishing Company. [53]Malinowski,Bronislaw(1922/1961). Argonauts of the Western Pacific:An account of native enterprise and adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea. New York:E. P. Dutton & Co.,Inc. [54]Manners,Robert A.,& Kaplan,David(Eds.)(1968). Theory in anthropology:A source-book. Chicago:Aldine Publishing Company. [55]Mauss,Marcel(1950/1990). The gift:The forms and reason for exchange in archaic societies. London:Routledge. [56]May,William F.(1980). Doing ethics:The bearing of ethical theories on fieldwork. Social Problems,27(3),358-370. [57]Mead,Margaret(1928/1961). Coming of age in Samoa:A psychological study of primitive youth for western civilization. New York:Morrow. [58]Milton,Kay(1979). Male bias in anthropology. Man(N.S.),14(1),40-54. [59]Mintz,Sidney W.(1989). The sensation of moving,while standing still. American Ethnologist,16(4),786-796. [60]Polanyi,Karl,Arensberg,Conrad M.,& Pearson,Harry W.(Eds.)(1957). Trade and market in the early empires:Economies in history and theory. Glencoe,Ill.:Free Press. [61]Polier,Nicole,& Roseberry,William(1989). Tristes tropes:Postmodern anthropologists encounter the other and discover themselves. Economy and Society,18(2),245-264. [62]Rabinow,Paul(1977). Reflections on fieldwork in Morocco. Berkeley:University of California Press. [63]Redfield,Robert(1941). Folk cultures of the Yucatan. Chicago:University of Chicago Press. [64]Richer,Stephen(1988). Field and the commodification of culture:Why the native are restless. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology,25(3),406-420. [65]Sahlins,Marshall(1981). Historical metaphors and mythical realities:Structure in the early history of the Sandwich Islands Kingdom. Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press. [66]Salamone,Frank A.(1979). Epistemological implications of fieldwork and their consequence. American Anthropologist,81,46-60. [67]Sangren,P. Steven(1988). Rhetoric and the authority of ethnography:“Postmodernism” and the social representation of texts. Current Anthropology,29(3),405-435. [68]Spencer,Jonathan(1989). Anthropology as a kind of writing. Man(N.S.),24,145-164. [69]Stocking,George W. Jr.(1983). The ethnographer’s magic:Fieldwork in British anthropology from Tylor to Malinowski. In George W. Stocking,Jr.(Ed.),Observers observed:Essays on ethnographic fieldwork(pp.70-120). Madison,Wisconsin:The University of Wisconsin Press. [70]Strathern,Marilyn(1987). Out of context:The persuasive fictions of anthropology. Current Anthropology,28(3),251-281. [71]Taussig,Michael T.(1987). Shamanism,colonialism,and the wild man:A study in terror and healing. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [72]The Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland(1954). Notes and queries on anthropology(6th ed.). London:Routledge and Kegan Paul. [73]Tsing,Anna Lowenhaupt(2005). Friction:An ethnography of global connection. Princeton:Princeton University Press. [74]Turner,Victor(1967). Muchona the hornet,interpreter of religion. In Victor Turner,The forest of symbols:Aspects of Ndembu ritual(pp.131-150). Ithace:Cornell University Press. [75]Ulin,Robert C.(1991). Critical anthropology twenty years later:Modernism and postmodernism in anthropology. Critiques of Anthropology,11(1),63-89. [76]毕恒达(2010)《教授为什么没告诉我:2010全见版》,台北:小毕空间。 [77]陈东升(1995)《金权城市:地方派系、财团与台北都会发展的政治学》,台北:巨流。 [78]陈东升(2003/2008)《积体网络:台湾高科技产业的社会学分析》,台北:群学。 [79]陈美华(2006)《公开的劳务、私人的性与身体:在性工作中协商性与工作的女人》,《台湾社会学》,11,1~55。 [80]陈美华(2008)《不可告人的秘密?——一个关于性工作研究中的性、性别与知识生产的反思》,《台湾社会研究季刊》,71,1~39。 [81]成令方(2010)《人工流产中不协调的三重唱:政策制定者、妇产科医师与女人的声音》,发表于《第九届性别与健康工作坊》,林口:长庚大学。 [82]杜思诚(2007)《高风险的性?——从男同志轰趴参与者的性实作检视“多重性伴侣”的艾滋风险论述》,台湾大学社会学研究所硕士论文。 [83]范云(2003)《政治转型过程中的妇女运动:以运动者及其生命传记背景为核心的分析取向》,《台湾社会学》,5,133~194。 [84]何明修(2003)《工厂内的阶级团结:联结石化工人的工作现场与集体行动》,《台湾社会学》,6,1~59。 [85]何明修(2008)《没有阶级认同的劳工运动:台湾的自主工会与兄弟义气的极限》,《台湾社会研究季刊》,72,49~91。 [86]蓝佩嘉(2008)《跨国灰姑娘:当东南亚帮佣遇上台湾的新富家庭》,台北:行人。 [87]李慈颖(2006)《以家之实,抗家之名:台湾女同志的成家实践》,台湾大学社会学研究所硕士论文。 [88]林国明(2009)《国家、公民社会与审议民主:公民会议在台湾的发展经验》,《台湾社会学》,17,161~217。 [89]林鹤玲(2001)《虚拟互动空间设计中的权力与控制:一个 MUD 社会创设的经验》,《台湾社会学》,2,1~53。 [90]王雅莉(2002)《越轨?转位:青少年参与八家将团体之分析》,世新大学社会发展研究所硕士论文。 [91]吴嘉苓、黄于玲(2002)《顺从、偷渡、发声与出走,台湾“病患”的行动分析》,《台湾社会学》,3,73~117。 [92]熊瑞梅(2001)《都市事件行动体系的分析:以台中市为例》,《台大社会学刊》,29,59~110。 [93]赵彦宁(2006)《亲属联结、社会规范与国境管理:中国福建省无证移民的研究》,《台湾社会学》,13,129~171。 [94]Arksey,Hilary,& Knight,Peter(1999). Interviewing for social scientists. Thousands Oaks,CA:Sage. [95]Atkinson,Robert(2002). The life story interview. In Jaber F. Gubrium & James A. Holstein(Eds.),Handbook of interview research:Context and method(pp.121-140). Thousands Oaks,CA:Sage. [96]Becker,Howard S.(2009)《这才是做研究的王道》(Tricks of the trade:How to think about your research while you’re doing it)(郭姿吟、吕锦媛译),台北:群学。 [97]Biernacki,Patrick,& Waldorf,Dan(1981). Snowball sampling:Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods and Research,10(2),141-163. [98]Denzin,Norman K.,& Lincoln,Yvonna S.(2003). Introduction:The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In Norman. K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln(Eds.),The landscape of qualitative research:Theories and issues(2nd ed.)(pp.1-45). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [99]DeVault,Majorie L.(1990). Talking and listening from women’ss standpoint:Feminist strategies for interviewing and analysis. Social Problems,37(1),96-116. [100]DeVault,Majorie L.(1999). Liberating method:Feminism and social research. Philadelphia:Temple University Press. [101]Douglas,Jack D.(1985). Creative interviewing. Beverly Hills,CA:Sage. [102]Eder,Donna,& Fingerson,Laura(2002). Interviewing children and adolescents. In Jaber F. Gubrium & James A. Holstein(Eds.),Handbook of interview research:Context and method(pp.181-201). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [103]Gubrium,Jaber F.,& Holstein,James A.(Eds.)(2002). Handbook of interview research:Context and method. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [104]Johnson,Jeffrey C.,& Weller,Susan C.(2002). Elicitation techniques for interviewing. In Jaber F. Gubrium & James A. Holstein(Eds.),Handbook of interview research:Context and method(pp.491-514). Thousands Oaks,CA:Sage. [105]Kvale,Steinar(1996). Interviews:An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [106]Mann,Chris,& Stewart,Fiona(2000). Internet communication and qualitative research:A handbook for researching online. London:Sage. [107]Miles,Matthew B.,& Huberman,A. Michael(1994). Qualitative data analysis:An expanded sourcebook(2nd ed.). London:Sage. [108]Nichter,Mimi(2001)《少女 Weight 的烦恼》(Fat talk:What girls and their parents say about dieting)(王绍婷译),台北:新新闻。 [109]Oakley,Ann(1981). Interviewing women:A contradictory terms?In Helen Roberts(Ed.),Doing feminist research(pp.30-61). London:Routledge. [110]Patton,Michael Quinn(1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. London:Sage. [111]Reinharz,Shulamit(1992). Feminist methods in social research. New York:Oxford University Press. [112]Reinharz,Shulamit,& Chase,Susan E.(2002). Interviewing women. In Jaber F.Gubrium & James A. Holstein(Eds.),Handbook of interview research:Context and method(pp.221-238). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [113]Riessman,Catherine Kohler(2002). Analysis of personal narratives. In Jaber F.Gubrium & James A. Holstein(Eds.),Handbook of interview research:Context and method(pp.695-710). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [114]Rubin,Herbert J.,& Rubin,Irene S.(2005). Qualitative interviewing:The art of hearing data(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [115]Seidman,Irving(2006). Interviewing as qualitative research:A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences(3rd ed.). New York:Teachers College Press. [116]Spradley,James P.(1979). The ethnographic interview. New York:Holt,Rinehart & Winston. [117]Trimberger,E. Kay(2006)《老娘不想定下来》(The new single woman)(陈秋萍译),台北:性林。 [118]Warren,Carol A. B.(2002). Qualitative interviewing. In Jaber F. Gubrium & James A. Holstein(Eds.),Handbook of interview research:Context and method(pp.83-102). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [119]Weiss,Robert S.(1994). Learning from strangers:The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York:The Free Press. [120]蓝佩嘉(2008)《跨国灰姑娘:当东南亚帮佣遇上台湾新富家庭》,台北:行人。 [121]李慈颖(2007)《女同志成家路迢迢》,谢国雄(编)《以身为度,如是我做:田野工作的教与学》(页123~157),台北:群学。 [122]林本炫(2003)《扎根理论研究法评介》,齐力、林本炫(编)《质性研究方法与资料分析》(页171~200),嘉义:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [123]林宗弘(2005)《译序:迈可·布若威与生产政治》,Michael Burawoy 著《制造甘愿:垄断资本主义劳动过程的历史变迁》,台北:群学。 [124]吴伟立(2007)《象牙塔的业务机密》,谢国雄(编)《以身为度,如是我做:田野工作的教与学》(页159~187),台北:群学。 [125]谢国雄(1997)《纯劳动:台湾劳动体制诸论》,台北:中研院社会学研究所。 [126]谢国雄(编)(2007)《以身为度,如是我做:田野工作的教与学》,台北:群学。 [127]徐宗国(1996)《扎根理论研究法:渊源、原则、技术与含义》,胡幼慧(编)《质性研究:理论、方法及本土女性研究实例》(页47~73),台北:巨流。 [128]徐宗国(2001)《拓边照顾工作:男护士在女人工作世界中得其所在》,《台湾社会学刊》,26,163~210。 [129]杨弘任(2007)《个案能说什么?——重探诠释个案法与延伸个案法》,周平、杨弘任(编)《质性研究方法的众声喧哗》(页1~18),嘉义:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [130]Bourdieu,Pierre(1990). The logic of practice. Polity Press. [131]Bourdieu,Pierre(1992). The practice of reflexive sociology. In Pierre Bourdieu & Loic Wacquant(Eds.),An invitation to reflexive sociology(pp.217-260). Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [132]Burawoy,Michael(1991). Extended case method. In Michael Burawoy(Ed.),Ethnography unbound:Power and resistance in the modern metropolis(pp.271-290). Berkeley:University of California Press. [133]Burawoy,Michael(1998). The extended case method. Sociological Theory,16(1),4-33. [134]Burawoy,Michael(2005/1979)《制造甘愿:垄断资本主义劳动过程的历史变迁》(Manufacturing consent:Changes in the labor process under capitalism)(林宗弘译),台北:群学。 [135]Charmaz,Kathy(2000). Grounded theory:Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln(Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research(pp.509-535). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [136]Charmaz,Kathy(2008). Constructing grounded theory:A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London:Sage. [137]Clarke,Adele(2005). Situational analysis. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [138]Foucault,Michel(1991). Question of method. In Graham Burchell,Colin Gordon & Peter Miller(Eds.),The Foucault effect:Studies in governmentality(pp.73-86). Chicago:The Chicago University Press. [139]Foucault,Michel(1992/1977)《规训与惩罚:监狱的诞生》(Discipline and punish:The birth of prison)(刘北成、杨远婴译),台北:桂冠。 [140]Geertz,Clifford(1999/1973)《文化的解释》(The interpretation of culture)(刘东、黄平译),南京:译林。 [141]Giddens,Anthony(1984). The constitution of society:Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley:University of California Press. [142]Glaser,Barney G.(1978). Theoretical sensitivity. Mill Valley,CA:The Sociology Press. [143]Glaser,Barney G.,& Strauss,Anselm L.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory:Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago:Aldine. [144]Kanter,Rosabeth Moss(2008/1977)《公司男女》(Men and women of the corporation)(Nakao Eki 译),台北:群学。 [145]Lee,Ching-kwan(1998). Gender and the south China miracle. Berkeley:University of California Press. [146]Mills,C. Wright(1995/1967)《社会学的想象》(The Sociological Imagination)(张君玫、刘钤佑译),台北:巨流。 [147]Neuman,W. Lawrence(2002)《当代社会研究法——质化与量化途径》(Social research methods qualitative and quantitative approaches)(王佳煌、潘中道等译),台北:学富。 [148]Ragin,Charles C.(1992). Introduction:Cases of “what is a case?”. In Charles C. Ragin & Howard S. Becker(Eds.),What is a case?:Exploring the foundations of social inquiry(pp.1-17). New York:Cambridge University Press. [149]Stake,Robert(2000). Case studies. In Norman K. Denzin & Yvonna S. Lincoln(Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research(pp.435-454). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [150]Strauss,Anselm L.,& Corbin,Juliet(1997)《质性研究概论》(Basics of qualitative research:Grounded theory procedures and techniques)(徐宗国译),台北:巨流。 [151]Suddaby,Roy(2006). From the editors:What grounded theory is not. Academy of Management Journal,49,633-642. [152]Timmermans,Stefan,& Tavory,Iddo(2007). Advancing ethnographic research through grounded theory practice. In Antony Bryant & Kathy Charmaz(Eds.),The sage handbook of grounded theory(pp.493-513). London:Sage. [153]Wacquant,Loic(2002). Scrutinizing the street:Poverty,morality,and the pitfalls of urban ethnography. American Journal of Sociology,107,1468-1532. [154]West,Candace,& Zimmerman,Don H.(1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society,1(2),125-151. [155]Williams,Christine(1989). Still a man’s world. Berkeley:University of California Press. [156]艾珈如(2008)《2008北京奥运女性运动图像与视觉论述分析:以〈苹果日报〉为例》,台北:台湾体育大学体育研究所硕士论文。 [157]陈琮仁(2004)《九年一贯课程之教育论述分析》,嘉义大林:南华大学教育社会学研究所硕士论文。 [158]陈俊湘(2007)《我国教育政策与教育体系图书馆发展之批判论述分析(1945~2007)》,台北:台湾大学社会教育学系博士论文。 [159]陈婷玉(2008)《母职的媒体再现——以流行妇幼杂志为例》,2008年传媒的公共性与产业发展学术研讨会,嘉义大林。 [160]洪慧玲(2007)《性别平等教育法形成之论述分析》,台北:台湾师范大学教育学系硕士论文。 [161]黄筱君(2007)《十二年国民基本教育政策的批判论述分析——以“立法院”公报为例》,花莲:东华大学教育研究所硕士论文。 [162]林俶敏(2007)《人本教育基金会管教论述之探究》,台北:台湾师范大学教育学系硕士论文。 [163]林惠娟(2005)《原住民的报纸新闻再现——以花莲县长补选期间“杀猪涉贿选”争议为例》,宜兰:佛光人文社会学院传播学研究所硕士论文。 [164]林玟涟(2001)《原住民教育的论述分析——以四本专书为例》,台东:台东师范学院教育研究所硕士论文。 [165]马向青(2004)《台湾1990年代以后国民中学升学制度改革之批判论述分析》,高雄:高雄师范大学教育研究所硕士论文。 [166]苏雅蓉(2004)《“矮黑人”事件报道之论述分析》,花莲:东华大学民族发展研究所硕士论文。 [167]王美珍(2004)《台湾报纸对精神病烙印化之初探》,2004年中华传播学会年会学生论文:中华传播学会。 [168]周平、郭峰城(2008)《笑话文本中“残障”想象的论述形成》,周平、蔡宏政(编)《日常生活的质性研究》(页45~106),嘉义大林:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [169]Alvesson,Mats,& Karreman,Dan(2000a).Taking the linguistic turn in organizational research:Challenges,responses,consequences. Journal of Applies Behavioral Science,36,136-158. [170]Alvesson,Mats,& Karreman,Dan(2000b).Varieties of discourse:On the study of organizations through discourse analysis. Human Rlations,53,1125-1149. [171]Anderson-Gough,Flona,Grey,Christopher,& Robson,Keith(2000).In the name of the client:The service ethic in two professional services firms. Human Relations,53,1151-1174. [172]Austin,John Langshaw(1962). How to do things with words. Oxford:Clarendon Press. [173]Bourdieu,Pierre(1984). Distinction:A social critique of the judgment of taste. Trans.,Richard Nice.Cambridge,Massachusetts and London:Harvard University Press. [174]Butler,Judith(1997). Excitable speech:A politics of the performative. New York:Routledge. [175]Cameron,Deborah(1998).Is there any ketchup,Vera?:Gender,power and pragmatics. Discourse and Society,9,437-455. [176]Cameron,Deborah(2001). Working with spoken discourse. London:Sage. [177]Cameron,Deborah,& Kulick,Don(2003). Language and sexuality. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [178]Chalaby,Jean K.(1996).Beyond the prison-house of language:Discourse as a sociological concept. British Journal of Sociology,47,684-698. [179]Clegg,Stewart R.,& Hardy,Cynthia(1996a).Representations.In Stewart R.Clegg,Cynthia Hardy,& Walter R.Nord(Eds.),Handboook of organization studies(pp.676-708).London:Sage. [180]Fairclough,Norman(1995). Critical discourse analysis. London:Longman. [181]Fairclough,Norman,& Wodak,Ruth(1997).Critical discourse analysis:An overview.In Teun A.van Dijk(Ed.),Discourse as social interaction. London:Sage. [182]Foucault,Michel(1965). Madness and civilization:A history of insanity in the age of reason. New York:Vintage. [183]Foucault,Michel(1973). The order of things. New York:Vintage. [184]Garnsey,Elizabeth,& Rees,Bronwen(1996).Discourse and enactment:Gender inequality in text and context. Human Relations,49,1041-1064. [185]Grant,David,Keenoy,Tom,& Oswick,Cliff(1998).Organizational discourse:Of diversity dichotomy and multi-disciplinarity.In David Grant,Tom Keenoy,& Cliff Oswick(Eds.),Discourse and organization(pp.1-14).London:Sage. [186]Halliday,Michael A.K.(1989). Spoken and written language. Oxford:Oxford University Press. [187]Hampshire,Stuart(1978).The illusion of sociobiology. New York Review of Books,25,64-69. [188]Hardy,Cynthia(2001).Researching organizational discourse. International Studies in Management and Organization,31(3),25-47. [189]Holmes,Janet(2004).Power,lady,and linguistic politeness in language and women’s place.In Mary Bucholtz(Ed.),Language and women’s place:Text and commentaries(pp.151-157).Oxford:Oxford University Press. [190]Kleiner,Brian(1998).The modern racist ideology and its reproduction in pseudo-argument. Discourse and Society,9,187-215. [191]Labov,William(1966). The social stratification of English in New York city. Washington,DC:Centre for Applied Linguistics. [192]Lakoff,Robin Tolmach(1975). Language and women’s place. New York:Harper and Row. [193]O’Connor,Ellen S.(2000).Plotting the organization:The embedded narrative as a construct for studying change. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science,36,174-192. [194]Paltridge,Brian(2006). Discourse analysis. New York:Continuum. [195]Parker,Ian(1992). Discourse dynamics. London:Routledge. [196]Phillips,Nelson,& Hardy,Cynthia(2002). Discourse analysis:Investigating processes of social construction. London:Sage Publications. [197]Phillips,Nelson,& Ravasi,Davide(1988). Analyzing social construction in organizations:Discourse analysis as a research method in organization and management theory. Paper presented at the Third International Conference on Organizational Discourse:Pretexts,Subtexts and Contexts,London. [198]Rogers,Rebecca(2004).Setting an agenda for critical discourse analysis in education.In Rebecca Rogers(Ed.),An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education(pp.237-254).Mahwah,NJ:Laurence Erlbaum. [199]Sampson,Edward E.(1993).Identity politics:Challenges to psychology’s understanding. American Psychologist,12,1219-1230. [200]Schegloff,Emanuel A.(1992).In another context.In Alessandro Duranti & Charles Goodwin(Eds.),Rethinking context:Language as an interactive phenomenon(pp.191-228).Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press. [201]Searle,John(1979). Expression and meaning:Studies in the theory of speech acts. Cambrige,England:Cambridge University. [202]Swales,John M.(1990). Genre analysis:English in academic and research settings. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [203]Swann,Joan(2002).Yes,but is it gender?In Lia Litosseliti & Jane Sunderland(Eds.),Gender identity and discourse analysis(pp.43-67).Amsterdam:John Benjamins. [204]Threadgold,Terry(1989).Talking about genre:Ideologies and incompatible discourses. Journal of Cultural Studies,3(3),101-127. [205]van Dijk,Teun A.(1996).Discourse,power and access.In Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard & Malcolm Coulthard(Eds.),Texts and practices(pp.84-104).London:Routledge. [206]Wardhaugh,Ronald(1998). An introduction to sociolinguistics(3rd ed).Oxford:Blackwell. [207]Wetherell,Margaret(2001).Debates in discourse research.In Margaret Wetherell,Stephanie Taylor,& Simeon J.Yates(Eds.),Discourse theory and practice:A reader(pp.380-399).Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [208]Witten,Marsha(1993).Narrative and the culture of obedience at the workplace.In Dennis Mumby(Ed.),Narrative and social control:Critical perspectives. Newbury Park,CA:Sage. [209]Wittgenstein,Ludwig(1967). Philosophical investigations. Trans.,Gertrude E.M.Anscombe.Oxford:Blackwell. [210]Wood,Linda A.,& Kroger,Rolf O.(2000). Doing discourse analysis:Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [211]侯文咏(2002)《我的天才梦》,台北:皇冠。 [212]胡绍嘉(2008)《叙事、自我与认同:从文本考察到课程研究》,台北:秀威资讯。 [213]萧阿勤(2010)《回归现实:台湾一九七○年代的战后世代与文化政治变迁》(第二版),台北:中研院社会学研究所。 [214]游美惠(2000)《内容分析、文本分析与论述分析在社会研究的运用》,《调查研究》,8,5~42。 [215]Andrews,Molly(2007). Shaping history:Narratives of political change. Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press. [216]Atkinson,Paul(1995). Medical talk and medical work:The liturgy of the clinic. London:Sage. [217]Barker,Chris(2000). Cultural studies:Theory and practice. London:Sage. [218]Barthes,Roland(1966/1977).Introduction to the structural analysis of narratives.Trans,Stephen Heath.In Stephen Heath(Ed.),Image,music,text(pp.79-124).New York:Hill and Wang. [219]Bennett,Andrew,& Royle,Nicholas(1999). An introduction to literature,criticism,and theory(2nd ed.).London:Prentice Hall Europe. [220]Berger,Ronald J.,& Quinney,Richard(2005).The narrative turn in social inquiry.In Ronald J.Berger & Richard Quinney(Eds.),Storytelling sociology:Narrative as social inquiry(pp.1-11).Boulder,CO:Lynne Rienner. [221]Bruner,Jerome(1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press. [222]Burr,Vivien(1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London:Routledge. [223]Carr,David(1986). Time,narrative,and history. Bloomington,IN:Indiana University Press. [224]Carr,David(1994).Getting the story straight:Narrative and historical knowledge.In Jerzy Topolski(Ed.),Historiography between modernism and postmodernism:Contributions to the methodology of the historical research(pp.119-133).Amsterdam-Atlanta,GA:Rodopi B.V. [225]Chase,Susan E.(2005).Narrative inquiry:Multiple lenses,approaches,voices.In Norman K.Denzin & Yvonna S.Lincoln(Eds.),The sage handbook of qualitative research(3rd ed.)(pp.651-679).Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [226]Clandinin,D.Jean,& Connelly,F.Michael(2000). Narrative inquiry:Experience and story in qualitative research. San Francisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.蔡敏玲、余晓雯译(2003)《叙说研究:质性研究中的经验与故事》,台北:心理。 [227]Coffey,Amanda,& Atkinson,Paul(1996). Making sense of qualitative data:Complementary research strategies. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [228]Crossley,Michele L.(2000). Introducing narrative psychology:Self,trauma and the construction of meaning. Philadelphia,PA:Open University Press.朱仪羚等译(2004)《叙事心理与研究:自我、创伤与意义的建构》,嘉义:涛石文化。 [229]Danto,Arthur C.(1965). Analytical philosophy of history. Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press. [230]De Lauretis,Teresa(1984). Alice doesn’t:Feminism,semiotics,cinema. Bloomington,ID:Indiana University Press. [231]Gallie,Walter B.(1964). Philosophy and historical understanding. London:Chatto and Windus. [232]Gergen,Kenneth J.(1991). The saturated self:Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York:Basic Books. [233]Giddens,Anthony(1991). Modernity and self-identity:Self and society in the late modern age. Stanford,CA:Stanford University Press. [234]Himmelfarb,Gertrude(1984).Denigrating the rule of reason:The “New History” goes bottom-up. Harper’s Magazine,April,84-90. [235]Hinchman,Lewis P.,& Hinchman,Sandra K.(1997).Introduction.In Lewis P.Hinchman & Sandra K.Hinchman(Eds.),Memory,identity,community:The idea of narrative in the human sciences(pp.xiii-xxxii).New York:State University of New York Press. [236]Holstein,James A.,& Gubrium,Jaber F.(2000). The self we live by:Narrative identity in a postmodern world. New York:Oxford University Press. [237]Kellner,Hans(1989). Language and historical representation:Getting the story crooked. Madison,WI:The University of Wisconsin Press. [238]Labov,William,& Waletzky,Joshua(1967/1997).Narrative analysis:Oral versions of personal experience. Journal of Narrative and Life History,7,3-38. [239]Lyotard,Jean François(1979/1984). The postmodern condition:A report on knowledge. Trans.,Geoff Bennington & Brian Massumi.Manchester:Manchester University Press. [240]MacIntyre,Alasdair(1984). After virtue:A study in moral theory. Notre Dame,IN:University of Notre Dame Press. [241]Maines,David R.(2001). The faultline of consciousness:A view of interactionism in sociology. New York:Aldine de Gruyter. [242]Mandelbaum,Maurice(1967).A note on history as narrative. History and Theory,6(3),413-419. [243]McQuillan,Martin(2000).Introduction —Aporias of writing:Narrative and subjective.In Martin McQuillan(Ed.),The narrative reader(pp.1-33).London:Routledge. [244]Meyer,Michael(2001).Between theory,method,and politics:Positioning of the approaches to CDA.In Ruth Wodak & Michael Meyer(Eds.),Methods of critical discourse analysis(pp.14-31).London:Sage. [245]O’Leary,Brendan(2001).Instrumentalist theories of nationalism.In Athena S.Leoussi(Ed.),Encyclopaedia of nationalism(pp.148-153).New Brunswick,NJ:Transaction Publishers. [246]Polkinghorne,Donald E.(1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Albany,NY:State University of New York Press. [247]Radin,Paul(Ed.)(1926). Crashing thunder:The autobiography of an American Indian. New York:Appleton. [248]Rawick,George P.(1972). The American slave:A composite autobiography. Westport,CT:Greenwood. [249]Richardson,Laurel(1990).Narrative and sociology. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography,19(1),116-135. [250]Ricoeur,Paul(1980/1981).Narrative time.In W.J.Thomas Mitchell(Ed.),On narrative(pp.165-186).Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [251]Ricoeur,Paul(1981).The narrative function.In John B.Thompson(Ed. & trans.),Hermeneutics and the human sciences:Essays on language,action and interpretation(pp.274-296).Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press. [252]Ricoeur,Paul(1983/1984). Time and narrative,Vol.1. Trans.,Kathleen McLaughlin & David Pellauer.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [253]Ricoeur,Paul(1985/1988). Time and narrative,Vol.3. Trans.,Kathleen Blamey and David Pellauer.Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [254]Ricoeur,Paul(1991).Life in quest of narrative.In David Wood(Ed.),On Paul Ri-coeur:Narrative and interpretation(pp.20-33).London:Routledge. [255]Riessman,Catherine K.(1990). Divorce talk:Women and men make sense of personal relationships. New Brunswick,NJ:Rutgers University Press. [256]Riessman,Catherine K.(1993). Narrative analysis. 王勇智、邓明宇译(2003)《叙说分析》,台北:五南。 [257]Riessman,Catherine K.(2008). Narrative methods for the human sciences. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [258]Ringmar,Erik(1996). Identity,interest and action:A cultural explanation of Sweden’s intervention in the Thirty Years War. Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press. [259]Ruddick,Sara,& Daniels,Pamela(Eds.)(1977). Working it out:23 women writers,artists,scientists,and scholars talk about their lives and work. New York:Pantheon. [260]Somers,Margaret R.(1992).Narrativity,narrative identity,and social action:Rethinking English working-class formation. Social Science History,16(4),591-630. [261]Somers,Margaret R.,& Gibson,Gloria D.(1994).Reclaiming the epistemological “Other”:Narrative and the social construction of identity.In Craig Calhoun(Ed.),Social theory and the politics of identity(pp.37-99).Oxford,UK:Blackwell. [262]Spiegel,Gabrielle M.(2005).Introduction.In Gabrielle M.Spiegel(Ed.),Practicing history:New directions in historical writing after the linguistic turn(pp.1-31).New York and London:Routledge. [263]Spillman,Lyn(1995).Culture,social structures,and discursive fields. Current Perspectives in Social Theory,15,129-154. [264]Spillman,Lyn(2002).Introduction:Culture and cultural sociology.In Lyn Spillman(Ed.),Cultural sociology(pp.1-15).Malden,MA:Blackwell. [265]Squire,Corinne,Andrews,Molly,& Tamboukou,Maria(2008).Introduction:What is narrative research?In Molly Andrews,Corinne Squire,& Maria Tamboukou(Eds.),Doing narrative research(pp.1-21).London:Sage. [266]Stone,Lawrence(1979).The revival of narrative:Reflections on a new old history. Past and Present,85,3-24. [267]Taylor,Charles(1989). Sources of the self:The making of the modern identity. Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press. [268]Thomas,William I.,& Znaniecki,Florian(1918/1927). The Polish peasant in Europe and America. New York:Alfred A.Knopf. [269]Vann,Richard T.(1995).Turning linguistic:History and theory and history and theory,1960-1975.In Frank Ankersmit & Hans Kellner(Eds.),A new philosophy of history(pp.40-69).Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [270]White,Hayden(1987).The metaphysics of narrativity:Time and symbol in Ricoeur’s philosophy of history.In Hayden White(Ed.),The content of the form:Narrative discourse and historical representation(pp.169-184).Baltimorek,MD:The Johns Hopkins University Press. [271]White,Morton(1965). Foundations of historical knowledge. New York:Harper & Row. [272]Whitebrook,Maureen(2001). Identity,narrative and politics. London:Routledge. [273]Williams,Gareth(1984).The genesis of chronic illness:Narrative reconstruction. Sociology of Health and Illness,6,175-200. [274]范云(2010)《静默中耕耘细节的妇运革命》,吴介民、范云、顾尔德(编)《秩序缤纷的年代:走向下一轮民主盛世》(页117~136),台北:左岸文化。 [275]柯志明(2000)《理性的国家与历史的机遇:清代台湾的熟番地权与族群政治》,《台湾史研究》,6,1~76。 [276]柯志明(2001)《番头家:清代台湾族群政治与熟番地权》,台北:中研院社会学研究所。 [277]柯志明(2005)《历史的转向:社会科学与历史叙事的结合》,《台湾社会学》,10,149~170。 [278]林国明(2003)《到国家主义之路:路径依赖与全民健保组织体制的形成》,《台湾社会学》,5,1~71。 [279]邱毓斌(2010)《当工运的制度惰性遭遇全球化》,吴介民、范云、顾尔德(编)《秩序缤纷的年代:走向下一轮民主盛世》(页99~116),台北:左岸文化。 [280]汤志杰(2006)《势不可免的冲突:从结构/过程的辩证看美丽岛事件的发生》,《台湾社会学》,13,77~128。 [281]吴乃德(2000)《人的精神理念在历史变革中的作用——美丽岛事件和台湾民主化》,《台湾政治学刊》,4,57~103。 [282]萧阿勤(2010)《回归现实:台湾1970年代的战后世代与文化政治变迁》,台北:中研院社会学研究所。 [283]Abbott,Andrew(1992).From causes to events:Notes on narrative postivism. Sociological Methods and Research,20,456-480. [284]Abbott,Andrew(2001). Time matters:On theory and method. Chicago:University of Chicago Press. [285]Abrams,Philip(1982). Historical sociology. Ithaca,N.Y.:Cornell University Press. [286]Adams,Julia,Clemens,Elisabeth S.,& Orloff,Ann Shola(2005).Introduction:Social theory,modernity and the three waves of historical sociology.In Julia Adams,Elisabeth Clemens,Ann Shola Orloff,& George Steinmetz(Eds.),Remaking modernity:Politics,history,and sociology(pp.1-72).London:Duke University Press. [287]Alford,Robert R.(1998). The craft of inquiry:Theories,methods,evidence. New York:Oxford University Press. [288]Aminzade,Ronald(1992).Historical sociology and time. Sociological Methods and Research,20,456-480. [289]Anderson,Perry(1974). Lineages of the absolutist state. London:Verso. [290]Bendix,Reinhard(1964). Nation-building and citizenship:Studies of our changing social order. Garden City,N.Y.:Doubleday. [291]Bloch,Marc(1953). The historian’s craft. New York:Vintage Books. [292]Bryant,Joseph M.(1994).Evidience and explanation in history and sociology:Critical reflections on Goldthorpe’s crique of historical sociology. The British Journal of Sociology,45,3-10. [293]Calhoun,Craig(1996).The rise and domestication of historical sociology.In Terrence J.McDonald(Ed.),The historic turn in the human sciences(pp.305-337).Ann Arbor,MI:The University of Michigan Press. [294]Dion,Douglas(1998).Evidence and inference in comparative case study. Comparative Politics,30,127-146. [295]Giddens,Anthony(1979). Central problems in social theory:Action,structure,and contradiction in social analysis. Basingstoke,Hampshire:Macmillan Education. [296]Giddens,Anthony(1984). The constitution of society:Outline of the theory of struc-turation. Berkeley:University of California Press. [297]Goldstone,Jack A.(1997).Methodological issues in comparative macrosociology. Comparative Sociology Research,16,107-120. [298]Goldstone,Jack A.(1998).Initial conditions,general laws,path dependence,and explanation in historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology,104(3),829-845. [299]Goldstone,Jack A.(2006).A history and sociology of historical sociology. International Journal of Comparative Sociology,47,359-369. [300]Goldthorpe,John H.(1991).The use of history in sociology:Reflections on recent tendencies. The British Journal of Sociology,42,211-230. [301]Goldthorpe,John H.(1997).Current issues in comparative macrosociology. Comparative Social Research,16,1-26. [302]Griffin,Larry J.(1992).Temporality,events,and explanation in historical sociology:An introduction. Sociological Methods and Research,20,403-427. [303]Griffin,Larry J.(1993).Narrative,event-structure analysis and causal interpretation in historical sociology. The American Journal of Sociology,98,1094-1131. [304]Isaac,Larry W.(1997).Transforming localities:Reflections on time causality,and nar-rative in contemporary historical sociology. Historical Medhods,30(1),4-12. [305]Katznelson,Ian(1997).Structure and contiguration in comparative politics.In Mark Irving Lichbach & Alan S.Zuckerman(Ed.),Comparative politics:Rationality,culture,and structure(pp.81-112).New York,NY,USA:Cambridge University Press. [306]Kieser,Edgar,& Hecheter,Michael(1991).The role of general theory in comparative-historical sociology. American Journal of Sociology,97,1-30. [307]Lieberson,Stanley(1991).Small N’s and big conclusions:An examination of the reasoning in comparative studies based on a small number of cases. Social Forces,70,307-320. [308]Lieberson,Stanley(1994).More on the uneasy case for using mill-type methods in small-n comparative studies. Social Forces,72,1225-1237. [309]Lijphart,Arend(1999). Patterns of democracy:Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries. New Haven:Yale University Press. [310]Lipset,Seymour M.(1950). Agrarian socialism:The cooperative commonwealth federation in saskatchewan,a study in political sociology. Berkeley:University of California Press. [311]Lipset,Seymour M.(1963). The first new nation:The United States in historical and comparative perspective. New York:Basic Books. [312]Lipset,Seymour M.,& Rokkan,Stein(1967).Cleavage structures,party systems,and voter alignments.An introduction.In Seymour M.Lipset & Stein Rokkan(Eds.),Party systems and voter alignments:Cross-national perspectives(pp.1-64).New York:Free Press. [313]Mahoney,James(2000).Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society,29,507-548. [314]Mahoney,James(2001).Path-dependent explanations of regime change:Central America in comparative perspective. Comparative International Development,36(1),111-141. [315]Mahoney,James(2003).Strategies of causal assessment in comparative historical analysis.In James Mahoney & Dietrich Rueschemeyer(Eds.),Comparative historical analysis in the social sciences(pp.337-372).New York:Cambridge University Press. [316]Mahoney,James(2006).On the second wave of historical sociology,1970s-present. International Journal of Comparative Sociology,47(5),371-377. [317]Marx,Karl(1963). The 18th of brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. New York:International Publishers. [318]McDonald,Terrence J.(1996). The historical turn in the human sciences. Ann Arbor,MI:University of Michigan Press. [319]Mills,C.Wright(1956). The power elite. New York:Oxford University Press. [320]Mills,C.Wright(1959). The sociological imagination. New York:Oxford University Press. [321]Moore,Barrington(1966). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy:Lord and peasant in the making of the modern world. Boston:Beacon Press. [322]Pierson,Paul(2000a).Increasings returns,path dependence,and the study of politics. American Political Science Review,94(2),251-267. [323]Pierson,Paul(2000b).Not just what,but when:Timing and sequence in political pro-cesses. Studies in American Political Development,14,72-92. [324]Pierson,Paul(2004). Politics in time:History,institutions,and social analysis. Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press. [325]Quadagno,Jill,& Knapp,Stan J.(1992).Have historical sociologists forsaken theory?Thoughts on the history theory relationship. Sociological Methods and Research,20,481-507. [326]Ragin,Charles C.(1987). The comparative method:Moving beyond qualitative and quantitative strategies. Berkeley:University of California Press. [327]Rueschemeyer,Dietrich,& Stephen,John D.(1997).Comparing historical sequences—A powerful tool for causal analysis. Comparative Social Research,16,55-72. [328]Sewell,William H.Jr.(1992).A theory of structure:Duality,agency,and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology,98,1-29. [329]Sewell,William H.Jr.(1996).Three temporalities:Toward an eventful sociology.In Terrence J.McDonald(Ed.),The historical turn in the human sciences(pp.245-280).Ann Arbor:University of Michigan Press. [330]Sewell,William H.Jr.(2005). Logics of history:Social theory and social transformation. Chicago:University of Chicago Press. [331]Skocpol,Theda(1979). States and social revolutions:A comparative analysis of France,Russia,and China. New York:Cambridge University Press. [332]Skocpol,Theda(1984a). Vision and method in historical sociology. New York:Cambridge University Press. [333]Skocpol,Theda(1984b).Sociology’s historical imagination.In Theda Skocpol(Ed.),Vision and method in historical sociology(pp.1-21).New York:Cambridge University Press. [334]Skocpol,Theda(1984c).Emerging agendas and recurrent strategies in historical sociology.In Theda Skocpol(Ed.),Vision and method in historical sociology(pp.356-391).New York:Cambridge University Press. [335]Skocpol,Theda(1988).An “uppity generation” and the revitalization of macroscopic sociology:Reflections at mid-career by a woman from the sixties. Theory and Society,17(5),627-643. [336]Skocpol,Theda(1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers:The political origins of social policy in the United States. Cambridge,Mass.:Belknap Press of Harvard University Press. [337]Skocpol,Theda(1994). Social revolutions in the modern world. New York:Cambridge University Press. [338]Skocpol,Theda(1996). Boomerang:Clinton’s health security effort and the turn against government in U.S.politics. London:W.W.Norton & Co. [339]Skocpol,Theda,& Somers,Margaret R.(1980).The uses of comparative history in macrosocial inquiry. Comparative Studies in Society and History,22,174-197. [340]Smith,Dennis(1991). The rise of historical sociology. Cambridge [Cambridgeshire];Oxford [Oxfordshire]:Polity Press. [341]Somers,Margaret R.(1996).Where is sociology after the historical turn?Knowledge culture,narrativity,and historical epistemologies.In Terence J.McDonald(Ed.),The historical turn in the human sciences(pp.53-89).Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press. [342]Somers,Margaret R.(1998).“We’re no angels”:Realism,rational choice,and relationality in social science. American Journal of Sociology,104,722-784. [343]Stone,Lawrence(1979).The revival of narrative:Reflections on a new old history. Past and Present,85,3-24. [344]Tilly,Charles(1964). The vendee. Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press. [345]Tilly,Charles(1984). Big structures,large processes,huge comparisons. New York:Russell Sage Foundation. [346]Tilly,Charles(1986). The contentious French:Four centuries of popular struggles. Cambridge,Mass.:Belknap Press. [347]Tilly,Charles(1994).The time of states. Social Research,61,269-295. [348]Wallerstein,Immanuel M.(1974). The modern world-system. New York:Academic Press. [349]黄进兴(1997)《中国近代史学的双重危机:试论“新史学”的诞生及其所面临的困境》,《中国文化研究学报》,6,263~284。 [350]柯志明(2001)《番头家:清代台湾族群政治与熟番地权》,台北:中研院社会学研究所。 [351]Abbott,Andrew(1991). History and sociology:The lost synthesis. Social Science History,15(2),201-238. [352]Abbott,Andrew(2001). Time matters:On theory and method. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [353]Abrams,Philip(1972). The sense of the past and the origins of sociology. Past and Present,55,18-32. [354]Abrams,Philip(1980). History,sociology,historical sociology. Past and Present87,3-16. [355]Abrams,Philip(1982). Historical sociology. Ithaca:Cornell University Press. [356]Braudel,Fernand(1980). On history. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [357]Burke,Peter(1992). History and social theory. Cambridge:Polity Press. [358]Dray,William H.(1970). Laws and explanation in history. Oxford:Clarendon Press. [359]Elton,Geoffrey R.(1967). The practice of history. New York:Thomas Y. Crowell. [360]Gallie,Walter B.(1968). Philosophy and the historical understanding. New York:Schocken Books. [361]Giddens,Anthony(1979). Central problems in social theory:Action,structure,and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley:University of California Press. [362]Giddens,Anthony(1981). A contemporary critique of historical materialism. London:MacMillan. [363]Griffin,Larry J.(1992). Temporality,events,and explanation in historical sociology:An introduction. Sociological Methods and Research,20,403-427. [364]Hempel,Carl(1942). The function of general laws in history. The Journal of Philosophy,39(2),35-48. [365]Kuhn,Thomas S.(1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [366]Merton,Robert K.(1987). Three fragments from a sociologist’s notebook:Establishing the phenomenon,specified ignorance,and strategic research materials. Annual Review of Sociology,13,1-28. [367]Mink,Louis O.(1966). The autonomy of historical understanding. In William H. Dray(Ed.),Philosophical analysis and history(pp.160-192). New York:Harper & Row. [368]Mink,Louis O.(1968). Philosophical analysis and historical understanding. The Review of Metaphysics,21(4),667-698. [369]Mink,Louis O.(1970). History and fiction as modes of comprehension. New Literary History,1(3),541-558. [370]Popper,R. Karl(1972). The objective knowledge:An evolutionary approach. Oxford:Clarendon Press. [371]Ricoeur,Paul(1981a). The narrative function. In John B. Thompson(Ed.),Hermeneutics and the human sciences:Essays on language,action and interpretation. Trans.,John B. Thompson(pp.274-296). Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [372]Ricoeur,Paul(1981b). Narrative tim. In W. J. Thomas Mitchell(Ed.),On narrative(pp.165-186). Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [373]Ricoeur,Paul(1984). Time and narrative,vol. 1. trans.,Kathleen McLaughlin & David Pellauer. Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [374]Ricoeur,Paul(1991a). From text to action. trans.,Kathleen Blamey & John B. Thompson. Evanston,II:Northwestern University Press. [375]Ricoeur,Paul(1991b). Life in quest of narrative. In David Wood(Ed.),On Paul Ri-coeur:Narrative and interpretation(pp.20-33). London:Routledge. [376]Sewell,William H. Jr.(1996). Three temporalities:Toward an eventful sociology. In Terrence J. McDonald(Ed.),The historic turn in the human sciences(pp.245-280). Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press. [377]Shepherd,John R.(邵式柏)(1993). Statecraft and political economy on the Taiwan frontier,1600-1800. Stanford:Stanford University Press. [378]Skocpol,Theda(1984). Emerging agendas and recurrent strategies in historical sociology. In Theda Skocpol(Ed.),Vision and method in historical sociology(pp.356-391). New York:Cambridge University Press. [379]Skocpol,Theda(1994). Social revolutions in the modern world. New York:Cambridge University Press. [380]Somers,Margaret R. & Gibson,Gloria D.(1994). Reclaiming the epistemological other:Narrative and the social construction of identity. In Craig Calhoun(Ed.),Social theory the politics of identity(pp.37-99). Oxford:Blackwell. [381]Somers,Margaret R.(1996). Where is sociology after the historic turn?Knowledge cultures,narrativity,and historical epistemologies. In Terrence J. McDonald(Ed.),The historic turn in the human sciences(pp.53-89). Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press. [382]Stinchcombe,Arthur L.(1978). Theoretical methods in social history. New York:Academic Press. [383]Stone,Lawrence(1979). The revival of narrative:Reflections on a new old history. Past and Present,85,3-24. [384]Tilly,Charles(1981). Sociology,meet history. In Charles Tilly,As sociology meets history(pp.1-52). New York:Academic Press. [385]Tilly,Charles(2002). Stories,identities,and political change. Lanham,MD:Rowman & Littlefield. [386]Tocqueville,Alexis de(1850/1987). Recollections:The French revolution of 1848. In Jacob P. Mayer & A. P. Kerr(Eds.),Souvenirs. trans.,George Lawrence. New Brunswick:Transaction. [387]Weber,Max(1949). Objective possibility and adequate causation in historical explanation. In Edward A. Shils & Henry A. Finch(Eds.),The methodology of the social science(pp.164-188). trans.,Edward A. Shils & Henry A. Finch. New York:Free Press. [388]汤京平(2001)《灾难、官僚与民主:台湾九二一震灾援救的政治与制度分析》,《中国行政评论》,11(1),67~98。 [389]汤京平、蔡允栋、黄纪(2002)《灾难与政治:九二一地震中的集体行为与灾变情境的治理》,《政治科学论丛》,16,137~162。 [390]萧瑞麟(20006)《不用数字的研究》,台北:培生。 [391]谢国雄(编)(2007)《以身为度、如是我做:田野工作的教与学》,台北:群学。 [392]徐宗国(1994)《扎根理论研究法:渊源、原则、技术与含义》,《香港社会科学学报》,4,194~221。 [393]Berg,Bruce L.(2004). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences(5th ed.).Boston:Allyn and Bacon. [394]Cortell,Andrew P.,& Peterson,Susan(1999). Altered states:Explaining domestic institutional change. British Journal of Political Science,29(1),177-203. [395]Creswell,John W.(1994). Research design:Qualitative & quantitative approaches. London:Sage. [396]Denzin,Norman K.(1989). Interpretive interactionism. London:Sage. [397]Downs,Anthony(1957). An economy theory of democracy. New York:Harper & Row Publishers. [398]Druckerman,Pamela(2007)《外遇不用翻译:10个国家24个城市的外遇模式与情欲地图》(Lust in translation)(颜湘如译),台北:大块文化。 [399]Eckstein,Harry(1975).Case study and theory in political science. In Fred I. Greenstein & Nelson W. Polsby(Ed.),Handbook of political science,vol. 7:Strategies of inquiry(pp.79-137). Reading,MA:Addison-Wesley. [400]Feagin,Joe R.,Orum,Anthony M.,& Sjoberg,Gideon(Ed.)(1991). A case for the case study. Chapel Hill:The University of North Carolina Press. [401]Flyvbjerg,Bent(2001). Making social science matter:Why social inquiry fails and how it can succeed again. Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press. [402]George,Alexander L.,& Bennett,Andrew(2004). Case studies and theory development in the social science. Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press. [403]Gerring,John(2007). Case study research:Principles and practices. New York:Cambridge University Press. [404]Hirschman,Albert O.(1970). Exit,voice,and loyalty:Responses to decline in frms,organizations,and states. Cambridge,MA:Harvard University Press. [405]Kennedy,Donald(1997/2008)《学术这一行》(Academic duty)(杨振富译)。台北:天下文化。 [406]Kim,W. Chan,& Mauborgne,Renée(2004/2005)《蓝海策略:开创无人竞争的全新市场》(Blue ocean strategy:How to create uncontested market space and make competition irrelevant)(黄秀媛译),台北:天下文化。 [407]King,Gary,Keohane,Robert O.,& Verba,Sidney(1994). Designing social inquiry:Scientific inference in qualitative research. Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press. [408]Kuhn,Thomas S.(1996). The structure of scientific revolutions(3rd ed.). Chicago:The University of Chicago Press. [409]Lam,Wai-fung,& Ostrom,Elinor(2009). Analyzing the dynamic complexity of development interventions:Lessons from an irrigation experiment in Nepal. Policy Sciences,Online First May 5. [410]Le Couteur,Penny,& Burreson,Jay(2004/2005)《拿破仑的纽扣:17个改变历史的化学故事》(Napoleon’s buttons:How 17 molecules changed history)(洪乃容译),台北:商周。 [411]Levitt,Steven D.,& Dubner,Stephen J.(2005/2006)《苹果橘子经济学》(Freakonomics:A rogue economist explores the hidden side of everything)(李明译),台北:大块文化。 [412]Loch,Christoph H.,& Huberman,Bernardo A.(1999). A punctuated-equilibrium model of technology diffusion. Management Science,45(2),160-177. [413]Logan,John R.,& Molotch,Harvey L.(1987). Urban fortunes:The political economy of place. Berkeley:University of California Press. [414]Lynd,Robert S.,& Lynd,Helen M.(1929). Middletown:A study in American culture. New York:Harcourt,Brace and World. [415]Lynd,Robert S.,& Lynd,Helen M.(1956). Middletown:A study in American culture. New York:Harcourt,Brace and World. [416]Melia,Kath M.(1997). Producing “plausible stories”:Interviewing student nurses. In Gale Miller & Robert Dingwall(Eds.),Context and method in qualitative research(pp.26-36). London:Sage. [417]Miller,Gale,& Dingwall,Robert(Eds.)(1997). Context and method in qualitative research. London:Sage. [418]Mukherjee,Neela(1997). Participatory rural appraisal and questionnaire survey:Comparative field experience and methodology innovations. New Delhi:Concept. [419]Ostrom,Elinor,Gardner,Roy,& Walker,James K.(1994). Rules,games,and common pool resources. Ann Arbor:The University of Michigan Press. [420]Polanyi,Michael(1962/2004)《个人知识:迈向后批判哲学》(Personal knowledge:Towards a postcritical philosophy)(许泽民译),台北:商周。 [421]Putnam,Robert D.(1993). Making democracy work:Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton,NJ:Princeton University Press. [422]Ragin,Charles C.,& Becker,Howard S.(1992). What is a case:Exploring the foundations of social inquiry. New York:Cambridge University Press. [423]Ragin,Charles C.(1992). Introduction:Cases of “What is a case?” In Charles C. Ragin & Howard S. Becker(Eds.),What is a case:Exploring the foundations of social inquiry(pp.1-17). New York:Cambridge University Press. [424]Ramon y Cajal,Santiago(1999/2000)《研究科学的第一步:给年轻探索者的建议》(Advice for a young investigator)(程树德译),台北:究竟。 [425]Repetto,Robert(Ed.)(2006). By fits and starts:Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of US environmental policy. New Haven,CT:Yale University Press. [426]Rihoux,Benoît,& Ragin,Charles C.(Eds.)(2008). Configurational comparative methods:Qualitative comparative analysis(QCA)and related techniques. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [427]Rizzolatti,Giacomo,Sinigaglia,Corrado,& Anderson,Frances(2008). Mirrors in the brain:How our minds share actions and emotions. New York:Oxford University Press. [428]Romanelli,Elaine,& Tushman,Michael L.(1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium:An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal,37(5),1141-1166. [429]Rosenthal,Uriel(1998). Future disasters,future definitions. In Enrico L. Quarantelli(Ed.),What is a disaster?Perspectives on question(pp.141-160). London:Routledge. [430]Scholz,Ronald W.,& Tietje,Olaf(2002). Embedded case study methods:Integrating quantitative and qualitative knowledge. Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [431]Stone,Clarence N.(1989). Regime politics:Governing Atlanta 1946-1988. Lawrence:University Press of Kansas. [432]Tang,Ching-ping(2003). Democratizing urban politics and civic environmentalism in Taiwan. China Quarterly,176,1029-1051. [433]Tang,Shui-yan,& Tang,Ching-ping(2004). Local governance and environmental conservation:Gravel politics and the preservation of an endangered bird species in Taiwan. Environment and Planning A,36,173-186. [434]Tiebout,Charles M.(1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy,64(5),416-426. [435]Walton,John(1992). Making the theoretical case. In Charles C. Ragin & Howard S. Becker(Eds.),What is a case:Exploring the foundations of social inquiry(pp.121-137). New York:Cambridge University Press. [436]Wiseman,Richard(2007/2008)《让你瞬间看穿人心的怪咖心理学》(Quirkology:The curious psychology of everyday lives)(洪慧芳译),台北:漫游者。 [437]Yin,Robert K.(2003). Case study research:Design and methods(3rd ed.). CA:Sage. [438]郭丰州、廖文伟(2008)《中文文字技术研究中的萃取词汇问题》,《“文本内容分析”在中文世界的应用和推广研讨会论文》,台北:东吴大学外双溪校区政治学系。 [439]洪永泰、徐振国(2005)《从“论述分析”到“文本内容分析”:政治文本中语码和数码的双重奏》,《且让井水通河水:政治学方法论的检讨与拓宽政治学方法论学术研讨会论文》,台北:“中国文化大学”建国南路推广部。 [440]洪永泰、徐振国、郭丰州(2008)《中文文字计数方法应用于文本内容分析之测试》,《“文本内容分析”在中文世界的应用和推广研讨会论文》,台北:东吴大学外双溪校区政治学系。 [441]金观涛(2003)《观念起源的猜想与证明——兼评〈“革命”的现代性——中国革命话语考论〉》,《中研院近代史研究所集刊》,42,125~140。 [442]金观涛、刘青峰(1999)《近代中国“权利”观念的意义演变——从晚清到〈新青年〉》,《中研院近代史研究所集刊》,32,209~260。 [443]林俶如(2001)《美国媒体对“特殊国与国关系论”报导之内容分析与立场倾向研究——以〈纽约时报〉〈华盛顿邮报〉〈华尔街日报〉〈洛杉矶时报〉为例》,台湾大学新闻学系硕士论文。 [444]林琼珠、洪炜婷(2009)《报纸民意论坛在两岸关系立场之内容分析》,《选举评论》,7,23~44。 [445]刘从苇(2006)《台湾政党的政策位置:非介入式与介入式测量的比较研究》,《台湾政治学刊》,10(2),3~62。 [446]刘小彪(2008.11.27)《中共党代会报告三十年的词汇变迁》,《南方周末》第1294期B09时局版,取自http://www.nanfangdaily.com.cn/nfzm/200811270129.asp。 [447]罗文辉,黄葳威(2001)《2000年“总统”选举公民营报纸新闻之比较研究》,《选举研究》,7(1),1~20。 [448]马伟云、谢佑明、杨昌桦、陈克健(2001)《中文语料库建构及管理系统设计》,《ROCLING第十四届计算语言学研讨会论文集》。 [449]苏蘅(1997)《台湾主要报纸新闻内容之转变(1947~1993年)》,《民意研究季刊》,200,17~47。 [450]文庭孝、邱均平、侯经川(2004)《汉语自动分词研究展望》,《现代图书情报技术》,7,6~10。 [451]徐振国(2007)《文本论述分析中的政治文化研究和意识形态探索——台湾社论标题中民主的议题变化》,石之瑜(编)《政治文化研究的现状与开展》(页123~145),台北:翰芦图书。 [452]徐振国(2009)《文本计数内容分析的量化基础和诠释途径》,《“文本内容分析”在中文世界的应用和推广研讨会论文》,台北:东吴大学外双溪校区政治学系。 [453]郑植荣(1993)《读者意见与报纸立场关联性研究:以“台独”问题为例》,政治大学新闻学系博士论文。 [454]郑自隆(1996)《1995年三届“立法委员”选举政党报纸竞选广告讯息与媒体策略分析》,《选举研究》,3(2),1~32。 [455]Beaugrande,Robert de(1997). The story of discourse analysis. In Teun A. van Dijk(Ed.),Discourse as structure and process(pp. 35-62). London:Sage Publication. [456]Berelson,Bernard(1952). Content analysis in communication research. Glencoe,Ill.:Free Press. [457]Carney,Thomas F.(1972). Content analysis:A technique for systematic inference from communications. Canada:University of Manitoba Press. [458]Danielson,Wayne,& Lasorsa,Dominic(1997). Perceptions of social change:100 years of front-page content in the New York Times and The Los Angeles Times. In Carl W. Roberts(Ed.),Text analysis for the social science:Method of drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts(pp. 103-115). Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [459]Franzosi,Roberto(2004). From words to numbers:Narrativedata,and social science. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press. [460]Holsti,Ole R.(1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading,MA.:Addison Wesley. [461]Kathleen,Carley(1997). Network text analysis:The network position of concepts.In Carl W. Roberts(Ed.),Text analysis for the social science:Method of drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts(pp. 79-100). Hillsdale NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Publishers. [462]Kleinnijenhuis,Jan,& Pennings,Paul(2001). Measurement of party positions on the basis of party programmes,media coverage and voter perceptions. In Michael Laver(Ed.),Estimating the policy positions of political actors(pp. 161-82). London:Routledge. [463]Krippendorff,Klaus(1980). Content analysis:An introduction to its methodology. California:Sage Publications. [464]Lasswell,Harold D.,Lerner,Daniel,& Pool,Ithiel de Sola(1952). The comparative study of symbols. Stanford University Press. [465]Laver,Michael,Benoit,Kenneth,& Garry,John(2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review,97(2),311-331. [466]McDonald,Michael D.,& Mendes,Silvia M.(2001). The policy space of party manifestos. In Michael Laver(Ed.),Estimating the policy positions of political actors. London:Routledge. [467]Rabinow,Paul,& Sullivan,William M.(1979). Interpretive social science:A reader. Berkeley:University of California Press. [468]Ricoeur,Paul(1979). The model of the text:Meaningful action considered as a text.In Paul Rabinow & William M. Sullivan(Ed.),Interpretative social science:A reader(pp. 73-101). Berkeley,University of California Press. [469]Roberts,Carl W.(Ed.)(1997). Text analysis for the social science:Method of drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts. Hillsdale NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,Publishers. [470]Roberts,Carl W.(1997). Semantic text analysis:On the structure of linguistic ambiguity in ordinary discourse. In Carl W. Roberts(Ed.),Text analysis for the social science:Method of drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts(pp.55-77). NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [471]Ryan,Marie-Laure(1999). Cyberspace textuality:Computer technology and literary theory. Bloomington:Indiana University Press. [472]Sorokin,Pitirim A.(1928). Contemporary sociological theories. New York:Harper & Brothers. [473]Stone,Philip J.(1997). Thematic text analysis:New agendas for analyzing text content. In Carl W. Roberts(Ed.),Text analysis for the social science:Method of drawing statistical inferences from texts and transcripts(pp. 35-54). NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. [474]van Dijk,Teun A.(1997). Discourse as structure and process. London:Sage Publications. [475]Yanow,Dvora,& Schwartz-Shea,Peregirine(Eds.)(2006). Interpretation and method:Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Armonk,N.Y. [476]郭婉盈(2007)《在生活世界中实践专业的慢性疗养院社工》,阳明大学卫生福利研究所硕士论文。 [477]江贞红(1995)《居家照顾服务员之工作压力及其因应方式研究》,台北:阳明大学公共卫生学研究所硕士论文。 [478]林津如、黄薇静(2010)《失窃的世代?——汉人家庭意识形态符码与原住民族儿童保护》,《台湾社会研究季刊》,77,407~417。 [479]林茹岚(2001)《嘉义市老人居家服务供需观点之探讨》,嘉义:中正大学社会福利研究所硕士论文。 [480]吕美慧(2008)《M. Foucault与 D. E. Smith 论述分析之比较及其对教育研究之启示》,《台北市立教育大学学报》,39(2),71~104。 [481]罗咏娜(1993)《居家照顾服务员工作动机与工作满意度之研究——以台北市为例》,台北:东吴大学社会工作所硕士论文。 [482]“内政部”(2001)《权力与控制对两性关系的影响》,《家庭暴力相对人审前鉴定制度工作手册》,附录四,“内政部”家庭暴力防治委员会。 [483]唐文慧(出版中)《当工作与照顾冲突,中产阶级母亲为何选择离职?——结构限制下的照顾者认同与母职实践》,《台湾社会研究季刊》。 [484]王璟云(2005)《疑“山穷水尽”盼“柳暗花明”——探讨精神科专科医院女性护理长之职场性别经验》,树德科技大学人类性学研究所硕士论文。 [485]王美懿(2009)《身为家庭暴力加害人处遇计划的“加害人”:一个解释性互动论的研究》,高雄医学大学医学社会学与社会工作学研究所硕士论文。 [486]王增勇、郭婉盈(2008)《建制民族志:勾勒在地权力地图的社会探究》,周平、蔡宏政(编)《日常生活的质性研究》(页27~44),嘉义:南华大学教社所。 [487]小宫有纪子(2008)《台湾婚姻移民之语言资源:阶级、性别与种族差异》,台湾大学社会学研究所硕士论文。 [488]谢妮(2009)《建制民族志?——一种新的方法视角》,《贵州社会科学》,7,59~63。 [489]谢育亚(2008)《“我真的错了吗?”:居家服务“冲突事件”的建制民族志研究》,阳明大学卫生福利研究所硕士论文。 [490]杨幸真(2007)《女性主义教师与校园生活》,《教育学刊》,28,169~193。 [491]杨正诚(2005)《析论组织俗民志的意义、概念、方法与实例》,《女学学志》,20,223~254。 [492]曾怡华(2004)《影响照顾服务员工作满意度之探讨——以嘉县居家服务为例》,嘉义:中正大学社会福利研究所硕士论文。 [493]张瑞玲(2009)《治疗型国家与高危险群策略:台湾药瘾艾滋减害计划的建制民族志分析》,成功大学公共卫生研究所硕士论文。 [494]Campbell,Marie,& Gregor,Francis(2002). Mapping social relations:A primer in doing institutional ethnography. Walnut Creek,CA:AltaMira Press. [495]de Montigny,Gerald A. J.(1995). Social working:An ethnography of frontline practice. Toronto:University of Toronto Press. [496]Freire,Paulo(2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York,Continuum International. [497]Garfinkel,Harold(1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs,NJ:Prentice Hall. [498]Grahame,Peter(1999). Doing qualitative research:Three problematics. Discourse of Sociological Practice,2(1),347-360. [499]Griffith,Alison,& Smith,Dorothy(1991). Constructing cultural knowledge:Mothering as discourse. In Arlene Mcharen & Jane Gashell(Eds.),Women & education:A Canadian perspective(pp.87-103). Calgary:Detselig. [500]Habermas,Jurgen(1971). Knowledge and human interests. trans.,Jeremy J. Shapiro.Boston:Beacon Press. [501]Kvale,Steinar(1996). Interviews:An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. London:Sage. [502]Liang,Li-fang(2010). Constructing migrant care labor:A study of institutional process and the discourse of migration and work. Ph. D. Diss.,Syracuse University. [503]Ng,Roxana(1996). Politics of community services. Halifax,Nova Scotia:Fernwood. [504]Smith,Dorothy E.(1987). The everyday world as problematic:A feminist sociology. Toronto:University of Toronto Press. [505]Smith,Dorothy E.(1990a). The conceptual practices of power. Toronto:University of Toronto Press. [506]Smith,Dorothy E.(1990b). Texts,facts,and femininity:Exploring the relations of ruling. New York:Routledge. [507]Smith,Dorothy E.(2002). Institutional ethnography. In Tim May(Ed.),Qualitative research in action(pp.17-52). Thousand Oaks,CA:Sage. [508]Smith,Dorothy E.(2005). Institutional ethnography:A sociology for people. Oxford:AltaMira Press. [509]Wang,T. Y. Frank(2002). Contesting identity of homemakers:Housewife,worker and daughter?Journal of Aging Studies,16,37-55. [510]陈怡静(2007)《从智能资本观点探讨组织变革过程中人力资源发展实务之角色》,政治大学企业管理学系博士论文。 [511]郭良文(1999)《质性资料的计算机化处理——以NUD*IST软件为例》,发表于“中华传播学会1999年年会”,关西。 [512]郭玉霞等(2009)《质性研究资料分析NVivo 8活用宝典》,台北:高等教育。 [513]黄玉幸(2006)《校务评鉴实施历程组织文化现象与变异之研究》,屏东教育大学教育行政研究所博士论文。 [514]赖文恩、季玮珠、丁志音(2005)《以微软软件包EXCEL处理质性研究田野资料》,《台湾医学》,9(5),696~702。 [515]林本炫(2003a)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件WinMAX操作手册》,齐力、林本炫(编)《质性研究方法与资料分析》(页201~244),嘉义大林:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [516]林本炫(2003b)《前辈的照顾——改信过程中神圣的建构》,卢蕙馨等(编)《宗教神圣:现象与诠释》(页127~148),台北:五南。 [517]林本炫(2004a)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件在质性研究中的应用》,林本炫、何明修(编)《质性研究方法及其超越》(页1~22),嘉义大林:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [518]林本炫(2004b)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件ATLAS.ti操作手册》,林本炫、何明修(编)《质性研究方法及其超越》(页263~306),嘉义大林:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [519]林本炫(2005a)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件N6操作手册》,林本炫、周平(编)《质性研究方法与议题创新》(页287~312),嘉义大林:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [520]林本炫(2005b)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件NVivo操作手册》,林本炫、周平(编)《质性研究方法与议题创新》(页313~339),嘉义大林:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [521]林本炫(2006)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件NVivo 7.0版操作手册》,周平、齐伟先(编)《文化研究的越界:文化现象研究与质性研究方法》(页249~291),嘉义大林:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [522]林本炫(2007)《不同构型研究方法的资料分析比较》,周平、杨弘任(编)《质性研究方法的众声喧哗》(页127~150),嘉义:南华大学教育社会学研究所。 [523]林本炫(2008)《宗教放生感应叙事的分析》,发表于台湾宗教学会2008年年会暨研讨会,台北:保安宫。 [524]林本炫(2009)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件MAXQDA 2007操作手册》,南华大学主办“第八届质性研究方法研习会”第二阶段“质性资料分析计算机软件工作坊”手册。 [525]林本炫(2010a)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件MAXQDA 10操作手册》,南华大学主办“第九届质性研究方法研习会”第二阶段“质性资料分析计算机软件工作坊”手册。 [526]林本炫(2010b)《质性研究资料分析计算机软件ATLAS.ti 6.0操作手册》,南华大学主办“第九届质性研究方法研习会”第二阶段“质性资料分析计算机软件工作坊”手册。 [527]林本炫、康素华(2008)《台湾宗教放生之类型及其变迁》,《台湾宗教学刊》,7(1),113~151。 [528]刘世闵(2003)《教育研究法:裸体者QSR N6(NUD*IST)》,《教育研究月刊》,115,140~143。 [529]刘世闵(2004)《大家来裸体:质性研究计算机辅助资料分析新利器QSR N6(NUD*IST)》,《教育科学期刊》,4(2),161~202。 [530]刘世闵(编)(2006)《质性研究资料分析与文献格式之运用》,台北:心理。 [531]刘世闵(编)(2007)《质性研究e点通》,高雄:丽文。 [532]刘世闵、吴璟(2002)《NVivo:新世纪的质性研究计算机辅助软件》,《慈济大学人文社会科学学刊》,1,135~151。 [533]张奕华、许正妹(2010)《质化资料分析:MAXQDA软件的应用》,台北:心理。 [534]Bazeley,Pat(2007). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Thousand Oaks,California:Sage Publications,Inc. [535]Boyatzis,Richard E.(1998/2005)《质性资料分析:如何透视质性资料》(Trans forming qualitative information:Thematic analysis and code development)(王国川、翁千惠译),台北:五南。 [536]Creswell,John W.(1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks,London and New Delhi:Sage. [537]Glesne,Corrine(1992/2005)《质性研究导论》(Becoming qualitative researchers:An introduction)(庄明贞、陈怡如译),台北:高等教育。 [538]Glaser,Barney G.,& Strauss,Anselm L.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York:Aldine. [539]Maclaran,Pauline,& Catterall,Miriam(2002). Analysing qualitative data:Computer software and the market research practitioner. Qualitative Market Research:An International Journal,5(1),28-39. [540]Miles,Matthew B.,& Huberman,A. Michael(1994/2005)《质性研究资料分析》[Qualitative data analysis:An expanded sourcebook(2nd ed.)](张芬芬译),台北:双叶书廊。 [541]Richards,Thomas J.,& Richards,Lyn(1994). Using computers in qualitative research.In Norman K. Dezin & Yvonna S. Lincoln(Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research(pp.445-462). Thousand Oaks,California:Sage. [542]Richards,Lyn(2005). Handling qualitative data. Thousand Oaks,California:Sage. [543]Strauss,Anselm,& Corbin,Juliet(1994). Grounded theory methodology. In Norman K.Dez & Yvonna S. Lincoln(Eds.),Handbook of qualitative research(pp.273-285). Thousand Oaks,California:Sage. [544]Strauss,Anselm,& Corbin,Juliet(1990/1997)《质性研究概论》(Basics of qualitative research:Grounded theory procedures and techniques)(徐宗国译),台北:巨流。 [545]Tesch,Renata(1990). Qualitative research:Analysis types and software tools. New York,Philadelphia and London:The Falmer Press. [546]Weitzman,Eben A.,& Miles,Matthew B.(1995). Computer programs for qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks,California:Sage.
[展开]

相关推荐

发表评论

同步转发到先晓茶馆

发表评论

手机可扫码阅读