摘要
本报告浏览了一年以来国外主流国际关系研究期刊上所发表的文章，并择其部分具有代表性的观点进行评述，以此把握当前国际关系研究的热点与新进展。目前，国际学界对于国际关系的研究出现了若干新动向，包括围绕全球国际关系学的辩论与反思、对亚洲国家国际秩序理念与实践的具体化探析、关于国际组织的作用及其有效性的多向考察，以及对人工智能治理和数据治理等全球治理新领域的积极探索等。这些新的热点与趋势值得关注。
作者
袁正清 ，中国社会科学院世界经济与政治研究所研究员，主要研究方向为国际关系理论、中国外交。
董贺 ，暨南大学国际关系学院/华侨华人研究院副教授，主要研究方向为国际关系理论、东亚区域合作。
- Bajpai，Kanti，and Evan A. Laksmana，“Asian Conceptions of International Order：What Asia Wants，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Cammett，Melani，and Aytuğ Şaşmaz，“The IO Effect：International Actors and Service Delivery in Refugee Crises，” International Studies Quarterly，Vol.66，No.4，2022.
- Canzutti，Lucrezia，and Martina Tazzioli，“Digital-Nondigital Assemblages：Data，Paper Trails，and Migrants’ Scattered Subjectivities at the Border，” International Political Sociology，Vol.17，No.3，2023.
- Do，Thuy T.，“Vietnam’s Prudent Pivot to the Rules-based International Order，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Eun，Yong-Soo，“Knowledge Production beyond West-Centrism in IR：Toward Global IR 2.0，” International Studies Review，Vol.25，No.2，2023.
- Fast，Larissa，and Róisín Read，“Using Data to Create Change？Interrogating the Role of Data in Ending Attacks on Healthcare，” International Studies Review，Vol.24，No.3，2022.
- Gray，Catriona，“More than Extraction：Rethinking Data’s Colonial Political Economy，” International Political Sociology，Vol.17，No.2，2023.
- Karkour，Haro L.，and Marco Vieira，“An Autoethnography of Hybrid IR Scholars：De-Territorializing the Global IR Debate，” International Political Sociology，Vol.17，No.3，2023.
- Kuik，Cheng-Chwee，“Malaysian Conceptions of International Order：Paradoxes of Small-state Pragmatism，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Liu，Ruonan，and Songpo Yang，“China and the Liberal International Order：A Pragmatic and Dynamic Approach，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Loh，Dylan M. H.，“Singapore’s Conception of the Liberal International Order as a Small State，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Lundgren，Magnus，Jonas Tallberg，Thomas Sommerer，and Theresa Squatrito，“When are International Organizations Responsive to Policy Problems？” International Studies Quarterly，Vol.67，No.3，2023.
- Misalucha-Willoughby，Charmaine，“The Philippines and the Liberal Rules-based International Order，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Mishra，Atul，“The World Delhi Wants：Official Indian Conceptions of International Order，c.1998-2023，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Nakano，Ryoko，“Japan and the Liberal International Order：Rules-based，Multilateral，Inclusive and Localized，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Ring，Jonathan，and Gary Uzonyi，“Rethinking Tests of the IO Effectiveness Hypothesis：Evidence from Counter-Piracy Efforts in the Global South，” International Studies Review，Vol.24，No.3，2022.
- Risse，Thomas，Wiebke Wemheuer-Vogelaar，and Frank Havemann，“IR Theory and the Core-Periphery Structure of Global IR：Lessons from Citation Analysis，” International Studies Review，Vol.24，No.3，2022.
- Ryu，Yongwook，“South Korea’s Role Conceptions and the Liberal International Order，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Schmitz，Hans Peter，and George E. Mitchell，“Understanding the Limits of Transnational NGO Power：Forms，Norms，and the Architecture，” International Studies Review，Vol.24，No.3，2022.
- Tallberg，Jonas，Eva Erman，Markus Furendal，Johannes Geith，Mark Klamberg，and Magnus Lundgren，“The Global Governance of Artificial Intelligence：Next Steps for Empirical and Normative Research，” International Studies Review，Vol.25，No.3，2023.
- Thalang，Chanintira Na，“Unpacking Thailand’s Conceptions of and Position within the Liberal International Order，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
- Umar，Ahmad Rizky Mardhatillah，“The Rise of the Asian Middle Powers：Indonesia’s Conceptions of International Order，” International Affairs，Vol.99，No.4，2023.
