章节
Development of Informatization of Chinese Courts in and Outlook for 2019
关键词
作者
陈甦 ,中国社会科学院学部委员,中国社会科学院法学研究所研究员、博士生导师。曾任中国社会科学院法学研究所、国际法研究所联合党委书记,法学研究所所长,现为《法学研究》主编。学术兼职为中国法学会副会长、中国法学会商法学研究会副会长、中国市场监督管理学会副会长等。长期从事民商法研究,主要研究方向为公司法、证券法、票据法、物权法等。在《法学研究》《中国法学》等核心期刊上发表论文70余篇,主编有《新中国法学研究70年》《民法总则评注》等著作10余种。
田禾 ,中国社会科学院国家法治指数研究中心主任、法学研究所研究员,中国社会科学院大学法学院特聘教授。兼任最高人民法院信息化专家咨询委员会委员、最高人民法院执行特约咨询专家。全国先进工作者,享受国务院政府特殊津贴。主要研究领域:刑事法治、实证法学、司法制度、亚洲法。
检索正文关键字
章节目录
- Preface Informatization of People’s Courts under Overall Strategic Layout of the State
-
I New Achievements in Informatization of People’s Courts in 2018
- (I)Information Technology Facilitates the Main Thrust of Justice for the People
- 1. Building an integrated litigation service center
- 2. Developing WeChat-Court applets
- 3. Exploration of cross-domain case-filing to case-filing nationwide
- 4. Using information means to solve “difficulties in delivery”
- 5. Internet courts have created a new mode of online litigation
- (II)Informatization Assists Trial Execution and Judicial Management
- 1. The technology for informatization has improved the quality and efficiency of trials
- 2. Informatization helps to basically solve the problem of the execution of cases
- 3. Information means improve the level of judicial management
- (III)Informatization Serves the State and Society
- 1. Informatization promotes judicial openness
- 2. Big data assists Party and government in decision-making
- 3. Using Internet to promote resolution of disputes
- (I)Information Technology Facilitates the Main Thrust of Justice for the People
-
II New Issues for Informatization of People’s Courts in 2018
- (I)More Focus on Structuring than on Application
- (II)More Focus on Technology than on Effect
- (III)More Focus on System than on Coordination
- (IV)More Focus on the Whole than on Details
- (V)More Focus on Convenience than on Safety
- (VI)More Focus on Facilities than on Talents
- (VII)More Focus on Speed than on Arguments
-
III New Trends in Informatization of People’s Courts in 2019
- (I)Continuing to Clarify Positioning of Information Work
- (II)Breaking through Bottleneck of Judicial Openness
- (III)Helping Long-term and Deep Resolution of Difficulties in the Execution of Court Procedures
- (IV)Improving Data Accuracy and Connectivity
- (V)Holding the Bottom Line of Judicial Information Security
- (VI)Cultivating and Focusing on Compound Talents
- (VII)Researching Positive Interaction Between Practice and Technology
相关文献
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Intelligent Trials” of Chinese Courts (2018)
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Intelligent Execution” of Chinese Courts (2018)
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Intelligent Management” of Chinese Courts (2018)
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Intelligent Litigation Service” of Chinese Courts (2018)
查看更多>>>