论文

捐赠网络与基金会信息公开

摘要

信息公开是慈善基金会赖以生存和发展的根本保障,也是慈善事业合法性的重要来源。现有关于影响信息公开因素的研究,忽略了组织网络这一近年来实践界初现的中观力量所带来的影响。引入社会网络分析和工具变量的信息公开影响因素模型表明,虽然我国基金会之间的捐赠体量和覆盖面不断增加和扩展,但捐赠网络仍较为松散;捐赠网络等外部治理环境对基金会信息公开具有积极影响,尤其对于处在捐赠接受方的基金会,其影响更为显著。因此,今后监管部门应积极培育和引导行业网络的构建,为提升行业公信力开拓新的路径。

作者

桑壮 ,清华大学公共管理学院博士生。
陶泽 ,清华大学公共管理学院博士研究生,研究方向:公益大数据。
程文浩 //程文浩,清华大学公共管理学院教授。

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • 陈强(2014):《高级计量经济学及Stata应用》,北京:高等教育出版社。
  • 陈小林、魏学强(2011):《企业捐赠的动机、影响因素与经济后果》,《会计之友》,12,7~10。
  • 华若筠、邓国胜(2015):《治理结构对慈善组织透明度的影响——基于中国公募基金会的实证研究》,《公共管理评论》,3,15~28。
  • 华若筠(2017):《组织身份与信息披露行为——基于中国基金会的实证研究》,清华大学公共管理学院博士学位论文。
  • 贾中华、梁柱(2014):《贸易开放与经济增长——基于不同模型设定和工具变量策略的考察》,《国际贸易问题》,4,14~22。
  • 康晓光、韩恒(2005):《分类控制:当前中国大陆国家与社会关系研究》,《社会学研究》,6,73~89。
  • 刘春湘、谭双泉(2008):《非营利组织合作网络及其联结机制》,《求索》,8,90~91。
  • 刘志明(2015):《非营利组织在线问责实践——基于中国基金会的实证》,《广东行政学院学报》,2,13~19。
  • 林聚任(2009):《社会网络分析:理论、方法与应用》,北京:北京师范大学出版社。
  • 李朔严(2018):《政党统合的力量:党、政治资本与草根NGO的发展——基于Z省H市的多案例比较研究》,《社会》,1,160~185。
  • 李泉、王占学(2014):《对外开放、交通便利度与城乡收入差距关系的实证研究——基于丝绸之路经济带沿线9省区的面板数据分析》,《区域经济评论》,4,78~84。
  • 王玉生、罗丹(2013):《非营利组织联盟现状及展望》,《时代金融》,5,137~144。
  • 徐宇姗(2016):《美国非营利组织社会网络结构及其对中国的启发 》,《中国非营利评论》,2,54~71。
  • 谢晓霞(2014):《慈善组织财务信息披露对捐赠的影响》,《财贸研究》,2,150~156。
  • 徐夏雨(2015),《组织网络与社会组织发展:一项基于浙江省的实证研究》,浙江大学公共管理学院硕士学位论文。
  • 杨平波(2010):《产权视角下非公募慈善基金会信息披露探讨》,《财会月刊》,15,36~37。
  • 张秀吉(2017):《地方政府信息公开行为机制研究》,清华大学公共管理学院博士学位论文。
  • 张立民、李晗(2013):《我国基金会内部治理机制有效吗? 》,《审计与经济研究》,2,79~88。
  • 赵秋爽(2013):《公益基金会信息透明度对其捐赠收入的影响研究》,东北财经大学硕士学位论文。
  • 赵宇(2017):《基于社会网络分析的数据中心项目有效沟通研究》,清华大学建设管理系硕士学位论文。
  • AbouAssi,K.& Tschirhart,M.(2018),“Organizational Response to Changing Demands:Predicting Behavior in Donor Networks”,Public Administration Review,78(1),126-136.
  • Acar,M.,et al.(2008),“Accountability When Hierarchical Authority Is Absent-Views from Public-private Partnership Practitioners”,American Review of Public Administration,38(1),3-23.
  • Appe,S.(2015),“NGO Networks,the Diffusion and Adaptation of NGO Managerialism,and NGO Legitimacy in Latin America”,Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organization s,27,187-208.
  • Behn,B.,et al.(2010),“The Determinants of Transparency in Nonprofit Organizations:An Exploratory Study”,Advances in International Accounting,26(1),6-12.
  • Bies,A.L.(2010),“Evolution of Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Europe”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,39(6),1057-1086.
  • Borgatti,S.P.& Foster,P.C.(2003),“The Network Paradigm in Organizational Research:A Review and Typology”,Journal of Management,29(6),991-1013.
  • Bouek,J.W.(2018),“Navigating Networks:How Nonprofit Network Membership Shapes Response to Resource Scarcity”,Social Problems,2018(65),11-32.
  • Brouard,F.& Glass,J.(2017),“Understanding Information Exchanges and Reporting by Grantmaking Foundations”,Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research,8(2),40-56.
  • Connolly,C.,et al.(2013),“Conversion Ratios,Efficiency and Obfuscation:A Study of the Impact of Changed UK Charity Accounting Requirements on External Stakeholders”,Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,24(3),785-804.
  • Cordery,C.(2013),“Regulating Small and Medium Charities:Does It Improve Transparency and Accountability?”Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,24(3),831-851.
  • Dainelli,F.,et al.(2013),“Web-Based Accountability Practices in Non-profit Organizations:The Case of National Museums”,Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,24(3),649-665.
  • Faulk,L.,et al.(2016),“Network Connections and Competitively Awarded Funding——The Impacts of Board Network Structures and Status Interlocks on Nonprofit Organizations' Foundation Grant Acquisition”,Public Management Review,18(10),1425-1455.
  • Faulk,L.,et al.(2017),“Competitive Advantage in Nonprofit Grant Markets:Implications of Network Embeddedness and Status”,International Public Management Journal,20(2),261-293.
  • Gandia,J.L.(2011),“Internet Disclosure by Nonprofit Organizations:Empirical Evidence of Nongovernmental Organizations for Development in Spain”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,40(1),57-78.
  • Gordon,T.P.,et al.(2009),“The Role of Rating Agencies in the Market for Charitable Contributions:An Empirical Test”,Journal of Accounting and Public Policy,28(6),469-484.
  • Gugerty,M.K.(2010),“The Emergence of Nonprofit Self-Regulation in Africa”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,39(6),1087-1112.
  • Guo,C.& Acar,M.(2005),“Understanding Collaboration Among Nonprofit Organizations:Combining Resource Dependency,Institutional,and Network Perspectives”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,34(3),340-361.
  • Herzog,P.S.& Yang,S.(2018),“Social Networks and Charitable Giving:Trusting,Doing,Asking,and Alter Primacy”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,47(2),376-394.
  • Hyndman,N.& McConville,D.(2016),“Transparency in Reporting on Charities' Efficiency:A Framework for Analysis”,Nonprofit & Voluntary Sector Quarterly,45(4),844-865.
  • Keating,E.K.& Frumkin,P.(2003),“Reengineering Nonprofit Financial Accountability:Toward A More Reliable Foundation for Regulation”,Public Administration Review,63(1),3-15.
  • Lecy,J.D.,et al.(2014),“Network in Public Administration”,Public Management Review,16(5),643-665.
  • Low,B.,et al.(2010),“Organizational Network Legitimacy and Its Impact on Knowledge Networks:The Case of China's TD-SCDMA Mobility Technology”,Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing,25(6),468-477.
  • Nie,L.,et al.(2016),“Exploring Factors that Influence Voluntary Disclosure by Chinese Foundations”,Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,27(5),2374-2400.
  • Provan,K.G.& Milward,H.B.(2001),“Do Networks Really Work?A Framework for Evaluating Public-Sector Organizational Networks”,Public Administration Review,61(4),414-423.
  • Rhodes,R.(1997),“Foreword”,In W.Kickert,E.Klijn,and J.Koppenjan(eds.),Managing Complex Networks,London:Sage.
  • Romzek,B.S.,et al.(2012),“A Preliminary Theory of Informal Accountability among Network Organizational Actors”,Public Administration Review,72(3),442-453.
  • Saxton,G.& Guo,C.(2011),“Accountability Online:Understanding the Web-Based Accountability Practices of Nonprofit Organizations”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,40(2),270-295.
  • Saxton,G.,et al.(2012),“The Determinants of Voluntary Financial Disclosure by Nonprofit Organizations”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,41(6),1051-1071.
  • Saxton,G.D.,et al.(2014),“Web Disclosure and the Market for Charitable Contributions”,Journal of Accounting & Public Policy,33(2),127-144.
  • Schalk,J.,et al.(2010),“Network Embeddedness and Public Agency Performance:The Strength of Strong Ties in Dutch Higher Education”,Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory,20(3),629-653.
  • Sidel,M.(2010),“The Promise and Limits of Collective Action for Nonprofit Self-Regulation:Evidence From Asia”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,39(6),1039-1056.
  • Similon,A.(2015),“Self-Regulation Systems for NPO Coordination:Strengths and Weaknesses of Label and Umbrella Mechanisms”,Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics,86(1),89-104.
  • Wasserman,S.& Faust,K.(1994),Social Network Analysis:Methods and Applications,Cambridge University Press,178.
  • Williams,A.P.& Taylor,J.A.(2013),“Resolving Accountability Ambiguity in Nonprofit Organizations”,Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,24(3),559-580.
  • Yang,A.& Cheong,P.H.(2018),“Building A Cross-Sectoral Interorganizational Network to Advance Nonprofits:NGO Incubators as Relationship Brokers in China”,Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly,1-30.
  • Yang,Y.J.,et al.(2018),“Celebrity Philanthropy in China:An Analysis of Social Network Effect on Philanthropic Engagement”,Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,published online,15 May 2018.
  • Zhou,Huiquan & Ye,Shihua(2019),“Fundraising in the Digital Era:Legitimacy,Social Network,and Political Ties Matter in China”,Voluntas:International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations,published online,1 April 2019.

捐赠网络与基金会信息公开

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥7.37 查看全文 >

VIP免费

论文目录

  • 一 引言
  • 二 理论分析与研究假说
  • 三 模型设定、数据说明和实证策略
    1. (一)因变量:中基透明指数(FTI)
    2. (二)自变量:基金会捐赠网络中心度(degree)
    3. (三)控制变量
      1. 1.外部治理
      2. 2.内部治理
      3. 3.组织特征
      4. 4.其他
  • 四 实证结果及分析
    1. (一)描述性统计
    2. (二)基准估计
    3. (三)异质性分析
    4. (四)稳健性检验
  • 五 总结与讨论

论文图片/图表

查看更多>>>