章节

性别与难民融入:有关融入与社会政策效果的定量分析

摘要

英国的难民数量正在增长,鉴于英国政府对欧洲难民危机的反应,难民人数还会继续增长。这篇论文另辟蹊径,对难民融入结果做了性别分析,分析涉及各个与社会政策高度相关的领域,包括社会网络、语言能力、健康、教育、就业与住房等。我们利用英国唯一的长期难民追踪调查对其进行了二手数据分析(secondary data analysis),以考察那些跟融入结果相关的因素。我们发现人们在语言、自述的健康状况、参与规划家庭开支的能力、可否进入正式的社会网络以及获得良好的住房条件方面存在显著的性别差异,女性的境遇普遍不如男性,有的不平等状况随着时间会持续,有的则会加剧。我们呼吁相关机构将难民融入的结果纳入其监测数据,以便识别和报告不平等状况。这些发现也使得人们可以判定哪些社保政策领域可能需要格外关注性别差异。

关键词

作者

张倩仪(Sin Yi Cheung) 是卡迪夫大学社会科学学院研究部副主任、社会学教授。她是Frontiers in Sociology期刊中种族和民族副刊的首席编辑。她在牛津大学获得博士学位,她在国际前沿期刊发表教育与工作、族群不平等和移民融入等方面的作品。她是第一部关于少数族群在西方社会不利地位的跨国研究著作Unequal Chances(Oxford University Press 2007)的联合主编。她的研究引起了英国政府劳动和养老部、内政部和副首相办公室的注意。通信地址:School of Social Sciences,Cardiff University,Glamorgan Building,King Edward VII Avenue,Cardiff CF10 3WT,UK.email:cheungsy@cardiff.ac.uk.
刘怡然 ,中国社会科学院社会学研究所助理研究员。她在牛津大学获得硕士学位,在清华大学获得博士学位。哈佛燕京学社访问学者,研究兴趣为经济社会学和政治社会学。

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • Ager,A.and Strang,A.(2004),.Home OfficeDevelopment and Practice Report28,London:HomeOffice.
  • Agresti,A.(1984),.New York:JohnWiley & Sons.
  • Anthias,F.and Pajnik,M.(eds.)(2014),,London:Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Bakker,L.,Cheung,S.Y.and Phillimore,J.(2016),‘TheAsylum-IntegrationParadox:Comparing Asylum Support Systems and Refugee Integration in The Netherlands and the UK’,54,4,118-132.
  • Berry,J.W.(1997),‘Immigration,Acculturation and Adaptation’ ,46,1,5-68.
  • Bhatia,S.and Ram,A.(2009),‘Theorizing identity in transnational and diaspora cultures:acritical approach to acculturation’,33,2,140-149.
  • Bloch,A.,Galvin,T.and Harrell-Bond,B.(2000),‘Refugee women in Europe:Some aspects of the legal and policy dimensions’,38,2,169-190.
  • Brahmbhatt,K.with Atfield,G,Irving,H,Lee,J.and O'Toole,T.(2007),,Refugee Council and University of Birmingham.
  • Carolan,M.(2010),‘Pregnancy health status of sub-Saharan refugee women who have resettled in developed countries:a review of the literature’,26,4,407-414.
  • Casimiro,S.,Hancock,P.andNorthcote,J.(2007),‘Isolation and insecurity:Resettlement issues among Muslim refugee women in Perth,Western Australia’,42,1,55-69.
  • Cebulla,A,Daniel,M,Devine,C.and Tipping,S.(2010),,London:HMSO.
  • Cheung,S.Y.(2014),‘Ethnic religious minorities and labour market integration:generational advancement or decline?’,37,1,140-160.
  • Cheung,S.Y.and Phillimore,J.(2014),‘Refugees,social capital,and labour market integration in the UK’,48,3,518-536.
  • Communities and Local Government(2012),,London:CLG.
  • Dumper,H.(2002),?:,Refugee Action.
  • Franz,B.(2003),‘Bosnian refugeewomenin(re)settlement:gender relations andsocial mobility’,73,86-103,
  • Fyvie,A.,Ager,A.,Curley,G.and Korac,M.(2003), “” ,Home Office Online Report 29/03.
  • Home Office(2000),,London:HMSO.
  • Home Office(2005),,London:Home Office.
  • Home Office(2010),UK Border Agency.Analysis,Research and Knowledge Management,,2005-2009 [computer file],Colchester,Essex:UK Data Archive[distributor],SN:6556.
  • Hunt,L.(2008),‘Women asylum seekers and refugees:opportunities,constraints and the role of agency’,7,3,281-292.
  • Joppke,C.(2007),‘Beyond nationalmodels:civic integration policies for immigrants inWestern Europe’,30,1,1-22.
  • Korac,M.(2009),,Oxford:Berghahn Books.
  • Koyama,J.(2014),‘ConstructingGender:RefugeeWomenWorking in theUnited States’ ,28,2,258-275.
  • Mamgain,V.and Collins,K.(2003),‘Off the Boat,Now off to Work:Refugees in the Labour Market in Portland,Maine’,16,2,113-146.
  • Migration Observatory(2011),.http://migrationobservatory.ox.ac.uk/sites/files/migobs/Report%20-%20Public%20Opinion.pdf.Accessed 8/4/16.
  • Pennix,R.(2003),‘Integration:the role of communities,institutions and the state’ in http://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/integration-role-communities-institutions-and-state.Accessed 15/9/15.
  • Phillimore,J.(2011),‘Approaches to welfare provision in the age of super-diversity:the example of health provision in Britain's most diverse city’,31,1,5-29.
  • Phillimore,J.(2012),‘Implementing integration in the UK:Lessons for integration theory,policy and practice’ & ,40,4,525-545.
  • Phillimore,J.and Goodson,L.(2008),‘Making a Place in the Global City-The Relevance of Indicators of Integration’,21,3,305-325.
  • Phillimore,J.Ferrari,E.and Fathi,J.(2004),,Birmingham Sandwell HMRA,CURS,The School of Public Policy,The University of Birmingham.
  • Phillips,D.(2006),‘Moving towards integration:the housing of asylum seekers and refugees in Britain’,21,4,539-553.
  • Pittaway,E.and Bartolomei,L.(2001),‘Refugees,Race and Gender:The Multiple Discrimination against Refugee Women’,19,6,21-32.
  • Sales,R.(2002),‘The deserving and the undeserving?Refugees,asylum seekers and welfare in Britain’,22,3,456-478.
  • UNFPA(2006),,New York:United Nation Population Fund.
  • UNHCR(2013),The facts:asylum in the UK.www.unhcr.org.uk/about-us/the-uk-andasylum.htmlAccessed 7/11/2013.
  • Vertovec,S.(2007),‘Super-diversity and its Implications’ ,30,6,1024-54.
  • Vickers,T.,Craig,G.and Atkin,K.(2012),‘Addressing ethnicity in social care research’ ,47,3,310-326.
  • Williams,F.(1989),,Cambridge:Polity.
  • Zetter,R.,Griffiths,D.,Sigona,N.and Hauser,M.(2002),,Oxford:Oxford Brookes University.

性别与难民融入:有关融入与社会政策效果的定量分析

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥10.75 查看全文 >

VIP免费

章节目录

  • 引言
  • 难民融入、性别与社会政策
  • 数据与方法
  • 关键变量
    1. 社交网络
    2. 语言能力
    3. 住房和全国难民援助署提供的安置房
    4. 受控变量
  • 研究问题:因性别而异的融入结果
  • 分析
  • 发现
    1. 性别与融入结果
  • 预测融入结果
    1. 性别与社交网络
    2. 性别与语言能力
    3. 性别与健康
    4. 住房与性别
    5. 教育、培训、就业,以及性别
  • 讨论
  • 结论

章节图片/图表

查看更多>>>