论文

社会认同和群际威胁对群际态度的影响:基于语言群际偏差的指标

摘要

群际态度是群际关系的指示器,预测着群际行为与群际和谐。已有研究从社会认同、群际威胁等方面分别探讨了对群际态度的影响,存在两方面的不足。第一,关于社会认同如何影响群际态度,研究结果并不一致;第二,群际态度受多种因素交互影响并未涉及。基于此,本研究以大学生为研究对象,探讨社会认同、群际威胁对群际态度是否存在交互影响。研究结果显示,无群际威胁且社会认同程度高时,A文化群组被试表现了对内群体积极行为的偏爱,而B文化群组被试对内群体消极行为表现出了保护的倾向。研究结果提示群体成员对内群体的态度发生了变化,并未出现无条件的内群体偏爱。而当群际威胁出现时,无论社会认同程度高低,A文化群组被试表现出了显著的内群体偏爱和外群体偏见,提示A文化群组成员更容易表现出对内群体的亲社会行为;而B文化群组被试只有在高社会认同时,才会出现明显的内群体偏爱。因此,社会认同程度、群际威胁交互影响了人们的群际态度。这些研究结果对预测群际行为与群际和谐具有重要的启示意义。

作者

夏瑞雪 ,西北师范大学心理学院教授,硕士生导师,通信作者,E-mail:xrx9391@163.com
李诺 ,西北师范大学心理学院硕士研究生
牛百灵 ,兰州财经大学工商管理学院助教。
苏婉茹 ,西北师范大学心理学院硕士研究生。
李世峰 ,西北师范大学心理学院讲师。
邵宏宏 ,西北师范大学心理学院硕士研究生
刘冰华 ,西北师范大学心理学院硕士研究生。
Xia Ruixue
Li Nuo
Niu Bailing
Su Wanru
Li Shifeng
Shao Honghong
Liu Binghua

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • 杜卫、闫春平、孙晓敏,2009,《社会认知中归纳推论—演绎推论的不对称性现象》,《心理科学进展》第5期,第1075~1080页。
  • 刘华,2008,《社会认同和内群体偏私的关系模型的实证研究》,硕士学位论文,陕西师范大学。
  • 许科、赵来军,2012,《临时团队成员内群体认同对合作行为的影响——一个被调节的中介模型》,《软科学》第10期,第116~120页。
  • 张婍、冯江平、王二平,2009,《群际威胁的分类及其对群体偏见的影响》,《心理科学进展》第2期,第473~480页。
  • 佐斌、徐同洁,2015,《低地位群体的内/外群体偏好:基于SC-IAT的检验》,《心理研究》第1期,第26~30页。
  • 曾盼盼、俞国良、林崇德,2011,《亲社会行为研究的新视角》,《教育科学》第1期,第21~26页。
  • Amiot,C.E.,& Aubin,R.M.(2013).Why and how are you attached to your social group? Investigating different forms of social identification.,563-586.
  • Brewer,M.B.(2001).Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict.,17-41.
  • Bettencourt,B.A.,Charlton,K.,Eubanks,J.,Kernahan,C.,& Fuller,B.(1999). Development of collective self-esteem among students:Predicting adjustment to college.,213-222.
  • Chen,X.P.,Wasti,S.A.,& Triandis,H.C.(2007).When does group norm or group identity predict cooperation in a public goods dilemma? The moderating effects of idiocentrism and allocentrism.31,259-276.
  • Everett,J.A.C.,Faber,N.S.,& Crockett,M.J.(2015).The influence of social preferences and reputational concerns on intergroup prosocial behavior in gains and losses contexts.,150-546.
  • Hewstone,M.,Rubin,M.,& Willis,H.(2002).Intergroup bias.,575-604.
  • Hogg,M.A.(2004).Social identity,self categorization,and communication in small groups.243.
  • Hunter,J.A.,Cox,S.L.,O'Brien,K.,Stringer,M.,Boyes,M.,Banks,M.,Hayhurst,G.J.,& Crawford,M.(2005).Threats to group value,domain-specific self-esteem and intergroup discrimination amongst minimal and national groups.,44,329-353.
  • Shulman,L.J.,Katherine A.Collins,& Richard Clément.(2011).In consideration of social context:Re-examining the linguistic intergroup bias paradigm. & ,310-332.
  • Jetten,J.,Spears,R.,& Manstead,A.S.(1997).Distinctiveness threat and prototypicality:Combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem.,27,635-657.
  • Kreidie,L.H.,& Monroe,K.R.(2002).Psychological boundaries and ethnic conflict:How identity constrained choice and worked to turn ordinary people into perpetrators of ethnic violence during the lebanese civil war. & ,5-36.
  • Leeuwen,E.V.,Bosch,M.V.D.,Castano,E.,& Hopman,P.(2010).Dealing with deviants:The effectiveness of rejection,denial,and apologies on protecting the public image of a group.,282-299.
  • Li,H.,Wang,E.X.,Jin,S.,Wu,S.(2016).Ethnic identity salience improves recognition memory in tibetan students via priming. & ,229.
  • Llorent,V.J.,Ortega-Ruiz,R.,& Izabela Zych.(2016).Bullying and cyber bullying in minorities:Are they more vulnerable than the majority group? 1507.
  • Maass,A.,Salvi,D.,Arcuri,L.,& Semin,G.R.(1989).Language use in intergroup contexts:The linguistic intergroup bias. 981-993.
  • Marques,J.D.C.M.(1990).The black sheep effect:Outgroup homogeneity in social comparison settings.In
  • Morrison,K.R.,Fast,N.J.,& Ybarra,O.(2009).Group status,perceptions of threat,and support for social inequality.,45,204-210.
  • Mourão,S.S.M.,& Bernardes,S.G.D.C.F.(2014).Ethnic minorities and immigrants therapeutic (non) adherence:What is the role of social and cultural contexts? 341-351.
  • Otten,S.,& Moskowitz,G.B.(2000).Evidence for implicit evaluative in-group bias:Affect-biased spontaneous trait inference in a minimal group paradigm.,77-89.
  • Penner,L.A.,Dovidio,J.F.,Piliavin,J.A.,& Schroeder,D.A.(2005).Prosocial behavior:Multilevel perspectives.,56,365-392.
  • Prashad,V.(2003).Bruce lee and the anti-imperialism of kung fu:A polycultural adventure.,51-90.
  • Riek,B.M.,Mania,E.W.,Gaertner,S.L.,Mcdonald,S.A.,& Lamoreaux,M.J.(2010).Does a common ingroup identity reduce intergroup threat? & ,403-423.
  • Randolph-Seng,B.,Reich,D.A.,& Demarree,K.G.(2012).On the nonconscious antecedents of social identification:Ingroup salience,outgroup salience,or both? ,335-349.
  • Renfro,C.L.,Duran,A.,Stephan,W.G.,& Clason,D.L.(2006).The role of threat in attitudes toward affirmative action and its beneficiaries.,41-74.
  • Shih,M.,& Ambady,P.N.(1999).Stereotype susceptibility:Identity salience and shifts in quantitative performance.,80-83.
  • Stangor,C.,& Leary,S.P.(2006).Intergroup beliefs:Investigations from the social side.,243-281.
  • Schmid,K.,& Muldoon,O.T.(2015).Perceived threat,social identification,and psychological well-being:The effects of political conflict exposure.,75-92.
  • Spears,R.,Doosje,E.J.,& Ellemers,N.(1997).Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness:The role of group identification. & ,538-553.
  • Stephan,W.G.,Ybarra,O.,Martnez,C.M.,Schwarzwald,J.,& Tur-Kaspa,M.(1998).Prejudice toward immigrants to Spain and Israel:An integrated threat theory analysis. 559-576.
  • Stephan,W.G.,Diaz-Loving,R.,& Duran,A.(2000).Integrated threat theory and intercultural attitudes:Mexico and the United States.,31,240-249.
  • Stephan,W.G.,& Renfro,C.L.(2002).From prejudice to intergroup emotions:Differentiated reactions to social groups.,119-122.
  • Stephan,W.G.,Ybarra,O.,& Morrison,K.R.(2009).Handbook of prejudice.In .
  • Semin,G.R.,& Fiedler,K.(1988).The cognitive functions of linguistic categories in describing persons:Social cognition and language. & ,558-568.
  • Simon,B.,Sturmer,S.,& Steffens,K.(2000).Helping individuals or group members? The role of individual and collective identification in aids volunteers. & ,26,497-506.
  • Tajfel,H.,& Turner,J.(1979).An integrative theory of intergroup conflict.94-109.
  • Tajfel,H.(1986).The social identity theory of intergroup behavior.,7-24.
  • Tarrant,M.,Calitri,R.,& Weston,D.(2012).Social identification structures the effects of perspective taking.,973-978.
  • Van Bavel,J.J.,& Cunningham,W.A.(2012).A social identity approach to person memory:Group membership,collective identification,and social role shape attention and memory.,1566-1578.
  • Wegge,J.,Van Dick,R.,Fisher,G.K.,Wecking,C.,& Moltzen,K.(2006). Work motivation,organizational identification,and well-being in call centre work. & ,60-83.
  • Wright,S.C.,Aron,A.,& Tropp,L.R.(2002).Including others (and groups) in the self.In .
  • Memory,16,910-917.

社会认同和群际威胁对群际态度的影响:基于语言群际偏差的指标

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥8.05 查看全文 >

VIP免费

论文目录

  • 一 问题提出
    1. (一)社会认同及其认同启动
    2. (二)群际威胁与社会认同威胁
    3. (三)群际态度的良好指标:语言群际偏差
  • 二 研究方法
    1. (一)材料与问卷
      1. 1.语言群际偏差范式材料的修订
      2. 2.社会认同启动问卷的修订
    2. (二)假设与设计
      1. 1.假设
      2. 2.设计
    3. (三)研究一
    4. (四)研究二
  • 三 结果与分析
    1. (一)研究一
    2. (二)研究二
  • 四 讨论
    1. (一)各美其美:内群体偏爱的稳健性
    2. (二)不过度保护内群体:群际态度的理性变化
    3. (三)群际威胁与社会认同交互影响群际态度
  • 五 未来研究展望

论文图片/图表

查看更多>>>