参考文献 查看全部 ↓

• Abramo，G.，D’Angelo，C. A.，& Di Costa，F.（2014）. A New Bibliometric Approach to Assess the Scientific Specialization of Regions. Research Evaluation，23（2），183-194.
• Acosta，M.，Coronado，D.，Ferrándiz，E.，& León，M. D.（2014）. Regional Scientific Production and Specialization in Europe：The Role of HERD. European Planning Studies，22（5），949-974.
• Aksnes，D. W.，van Leeuwen，T. N.，& Sivertsen，G.（2014）. The Effect of Booming Countries on Changes in the Relative Specialization Index （RSI） on Country Level. Scientometrics，101（2），1391-1401.
• Aldieri，L.，Gennaro，G.，Kotsemir，M. N. and Vinci，C. P.（2019）. An Investigation of Impact of Research Collaboration on Academic Performance in Italy，Quality and Quantity. 1-38.
• Barre，R.（1987）. A Strategic Assessment of the Scientific Performance of Five Countries. Science and Technology Studies，32-38.
• Bianchini，S.，& Llerena，P.（2016）. Science Policy as a Prerequisite of Industrial Policy. Economia e Politica Industriale，43（3），273-280.
• BILAT-USA.（2010）. Analysis of S&T Priorities in Public Research in Europe and the USA.
• BRICS Science，Technology and Innovation Ministerial Meeting（2015），Memorandum of Understanding on Cooperation in Science，Technology and Innovation between the Governments of The Federative Republic of Brazil，The Russia Federation，The Republic of India. The People’s Republic of China and The Republic of South Africa/Brasilia. 18 March 2015.
• BRICS Science，Technology and Innovation Work Plan 2015-2018（2015）.
• Cagnin C.（2014）. STI Foresight in Brazil，Foresight-Russia，Vol.8，No.2，pp.46-55.
• Chuang，Y. W.，Lee，L. C.，Hung，W. C.，& Lin，P. H.（2010）. Forging into the innovation Lead—A Comparative Analysis of Scientific Capacity. International Journal of Innovation Management，14（3），511-529.
• Confraria，H.，& Vargas，F.（2017）. Scientific Systems in Latin America：Performance，Networks，and Collaborations with Industry. The Journal of Technology Transfer，1-42 （article in press）.
• Daraio，C.，& Bonaccorsi，A.（2017）. Beyond University Rankings？Generating New Indicators on Universities by Linking Data in Open Platforms. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology，68（2），508-529.
• Debackere，K.，& Luwel，M.（2004）. Patent data for Monitoring S&T Portfolios. In Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research （pp.569-585）. Springer Netherlands.
• Debackere，K.，Luwel，M.，& Veugelers，R.（1999）. Can Technology Lead to a Competitive Advantage？A Case Study of Flanders Using European Patent Data. Scientometrics，44（3），379-400.
• Edler，J.（2010a）. Coordinate to Collaborate：the Governance Challenges for European International S&T Policy. In International Science and Technology Cooperation in a Globalized World. The External Dimension of the European Research Area，pp.135-160. Edward Elgar，Cheltenham.
• Edler，J.（2010b）. International Policy Coordination for Collaboration in S&T. Manchester Business School working papers，paper No.590.
• European Forum on Forward Looking Activities（2015）How to Design a European Foresight Process that Contributes to a European Challenge Driven R&I Strategy Process，European Forum on Forward Looking Activities，Policy Brief No.2.
• Figueroa，A. and Stamm，A.（2012）. Effective International Science，Technology and Innovation Collaboration：from Lessons Learned to Policy Change. In Meeting Global Challenges through Better Governance，pp.207-242. OECD Publishing.
• First BRICS Science，Technology and Innovation Ministerial Meeting.（2014）. Cape Town Declaration. 10 February 2014.
• Gassler，H.，Polt，W.，Schindler，J.，Weber，M.，Mahroum，S.，Kubeczko，K.，Keenan，M.（2004）. Priorities in Science & Technology Policy—An International Comparison. Project Report Commissioned by the Austrian Council for Research and Technology Development.
• Gautam，P.（2017）. An Overview of the Web of Science Record of Scientific Publications （2004-2013） from Nepal：Focus on Disciplinary Diversity and International Collaboration. Scientometrics，1-23.
• Georghiou，L.（2001）. Evolving Frameworks for European Collaboration in Research and Technology. Research Policy，30（6），891-903.
• Gokhberg，L.，Meissner，D.，Sokolov，A.（2016）. Deploying Foresight for Policy and Strategy Makers：Creating Opportunities through Public Policies and Corporate Strategies in Science，Technology and Innovation. Netherlands：Springer International Publishing Switzerland.
• Grebenyuk，A.，Pikalova，A.，Sokolov，A.，Shashnov. S.，Kaivooja，J.（2016）. Priority Setting in the EU Countries and the Russian Federation：The Best Practices，M，National Research University Higher School of Economics.
• Haegeman，K.，Spiesberger，M.，Veselitskaya，N.，Sokolov，A. and Weiss，G.（2015）. FTA Supporting Effective Priority Setting in Multi-lateral Research Programme Cooperation：The Case of EU-Russia S&T Cooperation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change，101，200-215.
• Harzing，A. W.，& Giroud，A. （2014）. The Competitive Advantage of Nations：An Application to Academia. Journal of Informetrics，8（1），29-42.
• Ionescu，C.（2015）. Challenges on the Integration of Romanian System Research，Development and Innovation in Innovation Union. Procedia Economics and Finance，32，986-991.
• Kahn，M.（2011）. A Bibliometric Analysis of South Africa’s Scientific Outputs：Some Trends and Implications. South African Journal of Science，107（1-2），1-6.
• Kotsemir M.，Kuznetsova T.，Nasybulina E.，Pikalova A.（2015）Identifying Directions for Russia’s Science and Technology Cooperation. Foresight and STI Governance，9 （4），54-72.
• Kotsemir，M.（2012）. Dynamics of Russian and World Science through the Prism of International Publications. Foresight-Russia，6（1），38-58.
• Kutlača，D.（2016）. Scientific Research Publication Productivity in the Areas of Mathematics and Physics in South Eastern Europe. Yugoslav Journal of Operations Research，24（3）.
• Kuwahara，T.，Cuhls K.，Georghiou，L.（2008）. Foresight in Japan. The Handbook of Technology Foresight Concepts and Practice. 170-183.
• Lee，L. C.，Lee，Y. Y.，& Liaw，Y. C.（2012）. Bibliometric Analysis for Development of Research Strategies in Agricultural Technology：The Case of China Taiwan. Scientometrics，93（3），813-830.
• Li，L.（2009）. Research Priorities and Priority-Setting in China. Vinnova Analysis. Vinnova.
• Mangematinæ，V.，& Errabi，K.（2012）. The Determinants of the Science-Based Cluster Growth：the Case of Nanotechnologies. Environment and Planning C：Government and Policy，30（1），128-146.
• Meissner，D.，Gokhberg，L.，Sokolov，A. （eds.）.（2013）. Science，Technology and Innovation Policy for the Future. Potentials and Limits of Foresight Studies. New York，Dordrecht，London，Heidelberg：Springer.
• Mertins，K.（2003）. Innovation in Indonesia. Fraunhoffer Institute.
• OECD.（2010）. Priority Setting for Public Research：Challenges and Opportunities，OECD Publishing，Paris.
• OECD.（2012）. Meeting Global Challenges through Better Governance. International Co-operation in Science，Technology and Innovation. OECD Publishing，Paris.
• Pouris A.，Raphasha，P.（2015）. Priorities Setting with Foresight in South Africa. Foresight and STI Governance，Vol.9，No.3，pp.66-79.
• Poznyak A.，Shashnov，S.（2011）. S&T Priorities for Modernization of the Russian Economy. Foresight-Russia，Vol.5，No.2，pp.48-56 ［in Russian］.
• Radosevic，S.，& Yoruk，E.（2014）. Are there Global Shifts in the World Science Base？Analysing the Catching up and Falling behind of World Regions. Scientometrics，101（3），1897-1924.
• Schuch，K.，Bonas，G. and Sonnenburg，J.（2012）. Enhancing Science and Technology Cooperation between the EU and Eastern Europe as well as Central Asia：a Critical Reflection on the White Paper from a S&T Policy Perspective. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship，1（1），article No.3.
• Serger，S. S. and Wise，E.（2010）. Internationalization of Research and Innovation：New Policy Developments. In 2nd Conference on Corporate R&D （CONCORD），3-4 March 2010，JRC European Commission，Seville.
• Sokolov，A.，Shashnov，S.，Kotsemir，M.，Grebenyuk，A.（2017）. Identification of Priorities for S&T Cooperation of BRICS Countries. International Organizations Research Journal. Vol.12. No.4，pp.32-67.
• Sokolov，A.，Shashnov，S.，Kotsemir，M.，Grebenyuk，A.（2019）Quantitative Analysis for a Better-Focused International STI Collaboration Policy：A Case of BRICS//Technological Forecasting and Social Change. Vol.147，October 2019，pp.221-242.
• Sokolov，A.，Chulok，A.（2016）Priorities for Future Innovation：Russian S&T Foresight 2030. Futures. Vol.80，No.June，pp.17-32.
• Sokolov A.，Shashnov S. A.，Kotsemir M. N.，Grebenyuk A. Y. S&T Priorities for BRICS Countries：In Search of a Win-Win Strategy，in：BRICS Innovative Competitiveness Report 2017. Ed. by M. Li，X. Zhao，M. Huang，A. Sokolov. Singapore：Springer，2018. doi Ch.2. pp.31-65.
• South Africa Government.（2010）. The New Growth Path.
• Tang，L.，& Shapira，P.（2011）. Regional Development and Interregional Collaboration in the Growth of Nanotechnology Research in China. Scientometrics，86（2），299-315.
• Tõnurist，P. and Kattel，R.（2016）. Can Research，Development，and Innovation Policies Cross Borders？The Case of Nordic-Baltic Region. Science and Public Policy，44（3），328-340.
• Varum，C. A. and Piscitello，L.（2011）. The Role of Public Policy in Strengthening Innovation Through Internationalization. In Science and Innovation Policy For The New Knowledge Economy，Edward Elgar，Cheltenham，162-182.
• Wang，L.（2016）. The Structure and Comparative Advantages of China’s Scientific Research：Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives. Scientometrics，106（1），435-452.