论文

搬家越多,创造力越高?

摘要

本研究聚焦于社会生态心理学的一个关键变量——居住流动是否会对个体的创造力产生影响,并且试图探究个体的开放性特质尤其是“宽容与尝试”和“理性与思辨”这两个维度在其中起到的调节效应。研究结果显示:(1)居住流动和个体创造力呈正相关,并且研究1验证了宽容与尝试维度在搬迁频率评价和日常创新行为间的正向调节效应;(2)研究2验证了理性与思辨维度在搬家次数、搬迁频率评价和创新行为成就间的正向调节效应。居住流动带来了更加复杂多样的外部环境,当个体保持开放包容的态度和理性思辨的认知方式时,有利于创造力的提升。

作者

陶雪婷 ,中国社会科学院研究生院硕士研究生。
Tao Xue-ting

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • 陈咏媛、康萤仪,2015,《文化变迁与文化混搭的动态:社会生态心理学的视角》,载杨宜音主编《中国社会心理学评论》第1辑,第224-263页。
  • 程玉洁,2012,《中学生日常创造性行为的特点及其与人格的关系》,博士学位论文,北京师范大学。
  • 戴逸茹、李岩梅,2018,《居住流动性对心理行为的影响》,《心理科学》第5期。
  • 邓小晴,2014,《中国文化背景下多元文化经验与创造性的关系》,硕士学位论文,首都师范大学。
  • 窦东徽、石敏、赵然、刘肖岑,2014,《社会生态心理学:探究个体与环境关系的新取向》,载《北京师范大学学报》(社会科学版)第5期,第43-54页。
  • 师保国、申继亮,2007,《家庭社会经济地位、智力和内部动机与创造性的关系》,《心理发展与教育》第1期,第30-34页。
  • 王登峰、崔红,2003,《中国人人格量表(QZPS)的编制过程与初步结果》,《心理学报》第1期。
  • 王登峰、崔红,2006,《中国人的“开放性”——西方“开放性”人格维度与中国人的人格》,《西南师范大学学报》(人文社会科学版)第6期,第1-10页。
  • 吴莹、赵志裕、杨宜音,2017,《文化混搭心理研究与现实中国社会的发展》,载杨宜音主编《中国社会心理学评论》第1辑,第1页。
  • Amabile,T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity:a componential conceptualization. ,45(2),357.
  • Brown,L. A.,& Moore,E. G. (1970). The intra-urban migration process:a perspective.,52(1),1-13.
  • Bechtel,R. B.,& Churchman,A. (eds.). (2003).. John Wiley & Sons,lnc.
  • Carson,S. H.,Peterson,J. B.,& Higgins,D. M. (2005). Reliability,validity,and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire.,17(1),37-50.
  • Chiu,C. Y.,Gries,P.,Torelli,C. J.,& Cheng,S. Y. (2011). Toward a social psychology of globalization.,67(4),663-676.
  • Costa,P. T. & Mccrae,R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. & ,13(6),653-665.
  • Cullen,J. M.,Wright Jr,L. W.,& Alessandri,M. (2002). The personality variable openness to experience as it relates to homophobia.,42(4),119-134.
  • DeYoung,C. G. (2014). Openness/Intellect:a dimension of personality reflecting cognitive exploration. In Cooper,M.L & Larsen,R.J. (Vol. 4,pp. 369-399). Washington,DC:American Psychological Association.
  • Dollinger,S. J.,Burke,P. A.,& Gump,N. W. (2007). Creativity and values.,19(2-3),91-103.
  • Feist,G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity.
  • Hanushek,E. A.,& Quigley,J. M. (1978). An explicit model of intra-metropolitan mobility.,54(4),411-429.
  • Hayes,A.(2013). Introduction to mediation,moderation,and conditional process analysis. 51(3),335-337.
  • Hayes,A. F. (2017).New York:The Guilford Press.
  • Huinink,J.,Vidal,S.,& Kley,S. (2011). Effects of residential mobility on job mobility over the life course.Working Paper.
  • Kang,N.,& Kwak,N. (2003). A multilevel approach to civic participation:Individual length of residence,neighborhood residential stability,and their interactive effects with media use.,30(1),80-106.
  • Kaufman,J. C.,& Beghetto,R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little:the four C model of creativity. ,13(1).
  • Kim,J. H. (2014). Residential and job mobility:interregional variation and their interplay in US metropolitan areas.
  • Kim,B. S.,Yang,P. H.,Atkinson,D. R.,Wolfe,M. M.,& Hong,S. (2001). Cultural value similarities and differences among Asian American ethnic groups.,7(4),343.
  • Leung,A. K. Y.,Maddux,W. W.,Galinsky,A. D.,& Chiu,C. Y. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity:the when and how.,63(3),169.
  • Long,L. (1988). New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Long,L. H.,& Boertlein,C. G. (1976). The geographical mobility of Americans:an international comparison (No. 64). US Dept. of Commerce,Bureau of the Census:for sale by the Supt. of Docs.,US Govt. Print. Off.
  • Leung,A. K. Y.,& Chiu,C. Y. (2008). Interactive effects of multicultural experiences and openness to experience on creative potential.,20(4),376-382.
  • Oishi,S. (2010). The psychology of residential mobility implications for the self,social relationships,and well-being. ,5(1),5-21.
  • Oishi,S.,Krochik,M.,Roth,D.,& Sherman,G. D. (2012). Residential mobility,personality,and subjective and physical well-being an analysis of cortisol secretion.Social Psychological &,3(2),153-161.
  • Oishi,S.,Kesebir,S.,Miao,F. F.,Talhelm,T.,Endo,Y.,Uchida,Y.,Yasufumi,s.,& Norasakkunkit,V. (2013). Residential mobility increases motivation to expand social network:But why? ,49(2),217-223.
  • Oishi,S.,& Schimmack,U. (2010). Residential mobility,well-being,and mortality.,98(6),980.
  • Oishi,S.,Schug,J.,Yuki,M.,& Axt,J. (2015). The psychology of residential and relational mobilities.In Gelfan,M.J.,Chiu,C.,& Hong,Y. 5,221-272.New York:Oxford University Press.
  • Oishi,S.,& Talhelm,T. (2012). Residential mobility:what psychological research reveals. ,21(6),425-430.
  • Owen,D.,& Green,A. (1992). Migration patterns and trends. ,1,17-38.
  • Rhodes,M. (1987). An analysis of creativity.In Isaksen,S.G. ,pp.216-222.Buffalo,NY:Bearly.
  • Rossi,P. H. (1955). New York:The Free Press.
  • Sampson,R. J. (1991). Linking the micro-and macrolevel dimensions of community social organization.,70(1),43-64.
  • Simonton,D. K.,& Ting,S. S. (2010). Creativity in Eastern and Western civilizations:the lessons of historiometry.&,6(3),329-350.
  • Sternberg,R. J.,& Lubart,T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity:prospects and paradigms.In Stemberg,R.J. ,1,3-15.Cambridge University Press.
  • Stokols,D. (1978). Environmental psychology. ,29(1),253-295.
  • Torrance,E.P.(1974). NJ:Personnel Press.

搬家越多,创造力越高?

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥8.9 查看全文 >

VIP免费

论文目录

  • 一 引言
  • 二 理论和研究概述
    1. (一)居住流动
    2. (二)创造力
    3. (三)居住流动和创造性
    4. (四)开放性
    5. (五)研究框架
  • 三 方法
    1. (一)研究1:开放性在居住流动和个体创造力关系中的调节效应
      1. 1.被试
      2. 2.测量
      3. 3.分析方法
      4. 4.结果和讨论
    2. (二)研究2:理性与思辨维度在个体居住流动和个体创造力关系中的调节效应
      1. 1.被试
      2. 2.测量
      3. 3.分析方法
      4. 4.结果和讨论
  • 四 讨论
    1. (一)居住流动和个体创造力的关系
    2. (二)开放性在居住流动和个体创造力关系中的调节效应
    3. (三)总结和不足

论文图片/图表

查看更多>>>