论文

西方高等教育研究的知识基础

摘要

学术论文不仅展现了科学发展的历史脉络,也是学者之间实现学术思想碰撞与知识继承的重要途径。知识基础对于高等教育研究而言具有极其重要的学术意义,是构筑学术基础、联结科研脉络的核心体现。本研究通过知识网络分析,聚焦西方高等教育研究领域知识基础的积累及演化情况,不仅为分析西方高等教育研究的整体研究结构、知识构成与学术脉络提供了实证依据,也为我国高等教育研究的发展提供了相应反思。

作者

刘浩
LIU Hao

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • 李杰. 2017. 科学计量与知识网络分析——基于BibExcel等软件的实践[M]. 北京:首都经济贸易大学出版社.
  • Anderson K J,Smith G. 2005. Students’ Preconceptions of Professors:Benefits and Barriers According to Ethnicity and Gender[J]. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences,27(2):184-201.
  • Astin A W. 1993. What Matters in College:Four Critical Years Revisited[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • Baum S,Ma J. 2007. Education Pays 2007:The Benefits of Higher Education for Individuals and Society[M]. Washington:The College Board.
  • Bauman G,Bustillos L,Bensimon E,et al. 2005. Achieving Equitable Educational Outcomes with All Students:The Institution’s Role and Responsibilities[R]. Washington:Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Bean J P. 2005. A Conceptual Model of College Student Engagement[C]. Philadelphia:Association for the Study of Higher Education Annual Meeting.
  • Becher T. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories[M]. Buckingham:Open University Press.
  • Becher T,Trowler P R. 2001. Academic Tribes and Territories:Intellectual Enquiry and the Culture of Disciplines(2nd ed.)[M]. Buckingham:Open University Press.
  • Biggs J,Tang C. 2003. Teaching for Quality Learning at University:What the Student Does(2nd ed.)[M]. London:Society for Research into Higher Education & Open University Press.
  • Biglan A. 1973a. The Characteristics of Subject Matter in Different Academic Areas[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,57(3):195-203.
  • Biglan A. 1973b. Relationships Between Subject Matter Characteristics and the Structure and Output of University Departments[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,57(3):204-213.
  • Birnbaum R. 2000. Management Fads in Higher Education[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • Boyer E. 1990. Scholarship Reconsidered:Priorities of the Professoriate[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences(2nd ed.)[M]. Hillsdale:Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Dowd A C,Coury T. 2006. The Effect of Loans on the Persistence and Attainment of Community College Students[J]. Research in Higher Education,47(1):33-62.
  • Gibbons M,Nowotny H,Scott P,et al. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge:The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Society[M]. London:Sage Publications.
  • Glaser B G,Strauss A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory[M]. Aldine:University of Chicago Press.
  • Gurin P,Dey E L,Hurtado S,et al. 2002. Diversity and Higher Education:Theory and Impact on Educational Outcomes[J]. Harvard Educational Review,72(3):330-366.
  • Heller D E. 1997. Student Price Response in Higher Education:An Update to Leslie and Brinkman[J]. Journal of Higher Education,68(6):624-659.
  • Kline R B. 2005. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling(2nd ed.)[M]. New York:The Guilford Press.
  • Lave J,Wenger E. 1991. Situated Learning:Legitimate Peripheral Participation[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • Leslie L L,Brinkman P T. 1987. Student Price Response in Higher Education[J]. Journal of Higher Education,58:181-204.
  • Lincoln Y S,Guba E G. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry[M]. London:Sage Publications.
  • Lindblom-Ylänne S,Trigwell K,Nevgi A,et al. 2006. How Approaches to Teaching Are Affected by Discipline and Teaching Context[J]. Studies in Higher Education,31(3):285-298.
  • Marton F,Saljo R. 1976. On Qualitative Difference in Learning:I-Outcome and Process [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology,46(1):4-11.
  • McDonagh P. 1997. Choosing Colleges:How Social Class and Schools Structure Opportunity[M]. Albany:SUNY Press.
  • Milem J,Chang M,Antonio A. 2005. Making Diversity Work on Campus:A Research Based Perspective[M]. Washington:Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  • Miles M B,Huberman A M. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis:A Sourcebook of New Methods[M]. Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications.
  • National Survey of Student Engagement. 2001. Improving the College Experience:National Benchmarks for Effective Educational Practice[R]. Bloomington:Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
  • National Survey of Student Engagement. 2002. From Promise to Progress:How Colleges and Universities Are Using Student Engagement Results to Improve College Quality[R]. Bloomington:Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research and Planning.
  • National Survey of Student Engagement. 2004. Student Engagement:Pathways to Collegiate Success[R]. Bloomington:Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
  • National Survey of Student Engagement. 2005. Student Engagement:Exploring Different Dimensions of Student Engagement[R]. Bloomington:Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
  • National Survey of Student Engagement. 2008. Promoting Engagement for All Students:The Imperative to Look within(2008 Results)[R]. Bloomington:Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.
  • Pascarella E T,Terenzini P T. 1991. How College Affects Students:Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • Pascarella E T,Terenzini P T. 2005a. How College Affects Students:A Third Decade of Research(2nd ed.)[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • Pascarella E T,Terenzini P T. 2005b. How College Affects Students(Vol. 2):A Third Decade of Research[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • Perna L W,Titus M A. 2005. The Relationship Between Parental Involvement as Social Capital and College Enrollment:An Examination of Racial/Ethnic Group Differences[J]. Journal of Higher Education,76(5):485-518.
  • Perna L W,Rowankenyon H T,Thomas S L,et al. 2008. The Role of College Counseling in Shaping College Opportunity:Variations Across High Schools.[J]. Review of Higher Education,31(2):131-159.
  • Persson O. 1994. The Intellectual Base and Research Fronts of JASIS 1986-1990[J]. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology,45(1):31-38.
  • Porter S R. 2006. Institutional Structures and Student Engagement[J]. Research in Higher Education,47(5):521-558.
  • Prosser M,Trigwell K. 1999. Understanding Learning and Teaching:The Experience in Higher Education[M]. Buckingham:Open University Press.
  • Ramsden P. 2003. Learning to Teach in Higher Education(2nd ed.)[M]. London and New York:Routledge Farmer.
  • Raudenbush S W,Bryk A S. 2002. Hierarchical Linear Models:Applications and Data Analysis Methods(2nd ed.)[M]. Thousand Oaks:SAGE Publications.
  • Schon D A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner:How Professionals Think in Action[M]. San Francisco:Jossey-Bass.
  • Shaw K M,London H B. 2001. Culture and Ideology in Keeping Transfer Commitment:Three Community Colleges[J]. Review of Higher Education,25(1):91-114.
  • Slaughter S,Leslie L L. 1997. Academic Capitalism:Politics,Policies and the Entrepreneurial University[M]. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Slaughter S,Rhoades G. 2004. Academic Capitalism and the New Economy:Markets,State,and Higher Education[M]. Baltimore:Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • St. John E P. 2003. Refinancing the College Dream:Access,Equal Opportunity,and Justice for Taxpayers[M]. Baltimore:The Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board. 2004. The 1992 Cohort of Texas Public Seventh-Grade Students Followed Through Higher Education by Race-Ethnicity and Gender[R]. Austin:Division of Planning and Information Resources.
  • Tinto V. 1975. Dropout from Higher Education:A Theoretical Synthesis of Recent Research[J]. Review of Educational Research,45(1):89-125.
  • Tinto V. 1993. Leaving College:Rethinking the Causes and Cures of Student Attrition[M]. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.
  • Tomás Rivera Policy Institute at University of Southern California. 2004. Caught in the Financial Aid Information Divide:A National Survey of Latino Perspectives on Financial Aid[R]. Reston:The Sallie Mae Fund.
  • Tornatzky L G,Cutler R,Lee J. 2002. College Knowledge:What Latino Parents Need to Know And Why they Don’t Know It[R]. Claremont:The Tomás Rivera Policy Institute.
  • U.S. Department of Education. 2006. A Test of Leadership:Charting the Future of U.S. Higher Education [EB/OL]. http://www.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/hiedfuture/reports/final-report.pdf.
  • Wenger E. 1998. Communities of Practice:Learning,Meaning and Identity[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

西方高等教育研究的知识基础

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥8.21 查看全文 >

VIP免费

论文目录

  • 一 问题提出
  • 二 研究设计
    1. (一)研究方法
    2. (二)研究对象
    3. (三)研究数据
  • 三 数据分析
    1. (一)被引频次
    2. (二)内容分析
    3. (三)聚类分析
    4. (四)时间演化
  • 四 研究结论与启示
    1. (一)研究结论
    2. (二)研究启示

论文图片/图表

查看更多>>>