论文

人口流动、信任与生活满意度:一个跨层次中介模型

摘要

居住地的变化与个体生活满意度的关系受到各界学者的广泛关注。本研究以中国综合社会调查(CGSS)数据为基础,采用跨层次分析方法,从人口流动率的角度,探讨人口流动与生活满意度的关系,进一步分析信任在二者之间的中介机制。研究发现,28个省(自治区、直辖市)居民的生活满意度水平差异显著,流动人口能见度对生活满意度具有显著的负向预测作用。同时研究还表明,认同信任在流动人口能见度(二层变量)与生活满意度之间起中介作用,但是流动人口能见度对个体的一般信任水平没有影响。本研究结果不仅可以帮助我们更好地理解居住流动与生活满意度的关系和机制,而且有利于我们更好地把握和应对居住流动对个体的消极影响。

作者

赵娜 ,中央财经大学社会与心理学院心理学系副教授,硕士生导师。
张莹 ,中央财经大学社会与心理学院心理学系讲师。
Zhao Na
Zhang Ying

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • 方杰、张敏强、邱皓政,2010,《基于阶层线性理论的多层级中介效应》,《心理科学进展》第8期。
  • 段成荣、杨舸、马学阳,2012,《中国流动人口研究》,中国人口出版社。
  • 段成荣、袁艳、郭静,2013,《我国流动人口的最新状况》,《西北人口》第6期。
  • 张雷、雷雳、郭伯良,2003,《多层线性模型的应用》,教育科学出版社。
  • 辛自强、周正,2012,《大学生人际信任变迁的横断历史研究》,《心理科学进展》第3期。
  • Adam,S. 2004. Would perfect mobility be perfect?European Sociological Review,20(1),1-11.
  • Biswas-Diener,R.,& Diener,E. 2006. The subjective well-being of the homeless,and lessons for happiness. Social Indicators Research,76(2),185-205.
  • Carp,F.M. & Carp,A. 1980. Person-environment congruence and sociability. Research on Aging:An International Bimonthly Journal,2(4),395-415.
  • Cho,S.,Lim,U.,Andersson,M.,Kim,E.,& Kohlhase,J.E. 2019. Residential mobility and social trust in urban neighborhoods in the Seoul metropolitan area,Korea. The Annals of Regional Science,63,117-145.
  • Dhoore,J.,Daenekindt,S.,& Roose,H. 2019. Social mobility and life satisfaction across European countries:A compositional perspective on dissociative consequences of social mobility. Social Indicators Research,144(3),1257-1272.
  • Dinesen,P.T. 2012. Does generalized (dis) trust travel?Examining the impact of cultural heritage and destination-country environment on trust immigrants. Political Psychology,33(4),495-511.
  • Ellis,R.A. & Lane,W.C. 1967. Social mobility and social isolation a test of Sorkin’s dissociative hypothesis. American Sociological Review,32(2),237-253.
  • Elgar,F.J.,Davis,C.G.,Wohl,M.J.,Trites,S.J.,& Martin,M.S. 2011. Social capital,health and life satisfaction in 50 countries. Health & Place,17(5),1044-1053.
  • Helliwell,J.F. & Putnam,R.D. 2004. The social context of well-being. Biological Sciences,359(1449),1435-1446.
  • Helliwell,J.F. 2003. How’s life?Combining individual and national variables to explain subjective well-being. Economic Modelling,20(2),331-360.
  • Houle,J.N.,& Martin,M.A. 2011. Does intergenerational mobility shape psychological distress?Sorokin revisited. Research in Social stratification and Mobility,29(2),193-203.
  • Rempel,J.K.,Holmes,J.G.,& Rempel,J.K. 1985. Trust in close relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49(1),95-112.
  • Jelleyman,T. & Spencer,N. 2008. Residential mobility in childhood and health outcomes:a systematic review. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health,62(7),584-592.
  • Larson,A.,Bell,M.,& Young,A.F. 2004. Clarifying the relationships between health and residential mobility. Social Science & Medicine,59(10),2149-2160.
  • Lee,C.Y. 2003. Do traditional values still exist in modern Chinese societies?Asia Europe Journal,1(1),43-59.
  • Lewicki,R.J. & Bunker,B.B. 1995. Trust in relationships:A model of development and decline. In B.B.Bunker & J.Z.Rubin (Eds.),Conflict,cooperation,and justice:Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch(pp.133-173). San Francisco,CA:Jossey-Bass.
  • Lun,J.,Oishi,S.,& Tenney,E.R. 2012. Residential mobility moderates preferences for egalitarian versus loyal helpers. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,48(1),291-297.
  • Nyqvist,F.,Nygard,M.,& Jakobsson,G. 2012. Social participation,interpersonal trust,and health:A study of 65-and 75-year-olds in western Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health,40(5),431-438.
  • Oishi,S. 2010. Residential mobility,self-concept,and positive affect in social interactions. JourPerspectives on Psychological Science,5(1),5-21.
  • Oishi,S. & Schimmack,U. 2010. Residential mobility,well-being,and mortality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,98(6),980-994.
  • Oishi,S.,Lun,J. & Sherman,G.D. 2007. Residential mobility,self-concept,and positive affect in social interactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93(1),131-141.
  • Oishi,S.,Miao,F.,Koo,M.,Kisling,J.,& Ratliff,K.A. 2012. Residential mobility breeds familiarity-seeking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,102(1),149-162.
  • Oishi,S.,Whitchurch,E.,Miao,F.F.,Kurtz,J.,& Park,J. 2009. “Would I be happier if I moved?” Retirement status and cultural variations in the anticipated and actual levels of happiness. Journal of Positive Psychology,4(6),437-446.
  • Preacher,K.J.,Michael,J.Z.,& Zhang,Z. 2010. A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods,15(3),209-233.
  • Smider,N.A.,Essex,M.J.,& Ryff,C.D. 1996. Adaptation to community relocation:the interactive influence of psychological resources and contextual factors. Psychology and Aging,11(2),362-372.
  • Simpson,J.A. 2007. Psychological foundations of trust. Current Directions in Psychological ScienceWiley-Blackwell),16(5),264-268.
  • Sorokin,P.A. 1927. Social mobility. New York:Harper and Brothers.
  • Sorrentino,R.M.,Holmes,J.G.,Hanna,S.E.,& Sharp,A. 1995. Uncertainty orientation and trust in close relationships:Individual differences in cognitive styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68(2),314-327.
  • Stokols,D.,& Shumaker,S.A. 1982. The psychological context of residential mobility and well-being. Journal of Social Issues,38(3),149-171.
  • Zang,E. & de Graaf,N.D. 2016. Frustrated achievers or satisfied losers?Inter-and intragenerational social mobility and happiness in China. Sociological Science,3,779-800.
  • Zhang,J.X. & Bond,M.H. 1993. Target-based interpersonal trust:Cross-cultural comparison and its cognitive model. Acta Psychologica Sinica,25(2),54-62.
  • Zhao,N.,Shi,Y.Y.,Xin,Z.Q.,& Zhang,J.X. 2019. The impact of traditionality/modernity on identification-and calculus-based trust. International Journal of Psychology,54(2),237-246.

人口流动、信任与生活满意度:一个跨层次中介模型

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥5.74 查看全文 >

VIP免费

论文目录

  • 一 引言
    1. (一)居住流动性
    2. (二)居住流动和生活满意度
    3. (三)认同信任的中介作用
    4. (四)研究框架
  • 二 方法
    1. (一)被试
    2. (二)变量
      1. 1.流动人口能见度(二层变量)
      2. 2.信任
      3. 3.生活满意度
    3. (三)数据分析方法
  • 三 结果
    1. (一)描述性因素分析
    2. (二)流动人口能见度与生活满意度的关系:信任的跨层次中介作用
  • 四 讨论
    1. (一)跨层次分析的必要性
    2. (二)居住流动性与生活满意度
    3. (三)两种信任类型及作用

论文图片/图表

查看更多>>>