章节

儒家关系主义的理论建构及其方法论基础

关键词

作者

黄光国 ,台湾大学心理系教授。

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • 费孝通,1948,《乡土中国》,上海:观察社。
  • 何友晖、陈淑娟、赵志裕,1991,《关系取向:为中国社会心理方法论求答案》,载杨国枢、黄光国主编《中国人的心理与行为》,台北:桂冠图书公司,第49~66页。
  • 黄光国,1999,《多元典范的研究取向:论社会心理学的本土化》,《社会理论学报》第2卷第1期。
  • 黄光国,1988,《儒家思想与东亚现代化》,台北:巨流图书公司。
  • 黄光国,1987,《王者之道》,台北:学生书局。
  • 黄光国,1995,《知识与行动:中华文化传统的社会心理诠释》,台北:心理出版社。
  • 叶启政,1982,《结构、意识与权力》,《社会学理论与方法研讨会论文集》,台北:“中央研究院”民族学研究所,第1~60页。
  • Bales,R.F.,1958,“Task Roles and Social Roles in Problem-Solving Groups”,in E.E.Maccoby,T.M.Newcomb,& E.L.Hartley(Eds.),Readings in Social Psychology(3rd ed.),New York:Holt,Rinehart,& Winston.
  • Blumer,H.,1969,“The Methodological Position of Symbolic Interactionism”,in H.Blumer,Symbolic Interactionalism:Perspective and Method,Englewood Cliffs,N.J.:Pretice-Hall,pp.1-60.
  • Charon,J.,1979,Symbolic Interactionism:An Introduction,an Interpretation,an Interation,Englewood Cliffs,N.J.:Prentice-Hall.
  • Deutsch,M.,1975,“Equity,Equality,and Need:What Determines Which Value Will be Used as the Basis of Distributive Justice?” Journal of Social Issues,No.31,pp.137-149.
  • Fleishman,E.H.,Harris,E.F. & Brutt,H.E.,1955,Leadership and Supervision in Industry:an Evaluation of a Supervisory Training Program,Columbus:Ohio State University Press.
  • Foa,E.B.,& Foa,U.G.,1976,“Resource Theory of Social Exchange”,in J.S.Thibaut,J.Spence & R.Carson(Eds.),Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology,Morristown,N.J.:General Learning Press.
  • Gibbs,J.C.,1979,“Kohlberg’s Moral Stage Theory:A Piagetian Revision”,Human Development,No.22,pp.89-112.
  • Giddens,A.,1979,“Agency,Structure”,in Central Problems in Social Theory,Berkeley:University of California Press,pp.49-95.
  • Greenberg,J. and Cohen,R.L.,1982,“Why Justice?Normative and Instrumental Interpretations”,in J.Greenberg and R.L.Cohen(Eds.),Equity and Justice in Social Behavior,New York:Academic Press,pp.437-467.
  • Halpin,A.W.,1966,Theory and Research in Administration,New York:Macmillan.
  • Harris,G.G.,1989,“Concepts of Individual,Self,and Person in Description and Analysis”,American Anthropologist,Vol. 91,No.3,pp.599-612.
  • Ho,D.Y.F. & Chiu,C.Y.,1998,“Collective Representations as a Metaconstruct:An Analysis based on Methodological Relationalism”,Culture and Psychology,Vol.4,No.3,pp.349-369.
  • Ho,D.Y.F.,1998,“Interpersonal Relationships and Relationship Dominance:An Analysis based on Methodological Relationalism”,Asian Journal of Social Psychology,No.1,pp.1-16.
  • Ho,D.Y.F.,1991,“Relational Orientation and Methodological Relationalism”,Bulletin of the Hong Kong Psychological Society,Nos.26-27,pp.81-95.
  • Ho,D.Y.F.,1993,“Relational Orientation in Asian Social Psychology”,in U.Kim & J.W.Berry(Eds.),Indigenous Psychologies:Research and Experience in Cultural Context,Newbury Park,CA:Sage,pp.240-259.
  • Holmes,J.G.,1981,“The Exchange Process in Close Relationships;Microbehavior and Macromotives”,in M.J.Lerner and S.C.Lerner(Eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior,New York:Plenum Press,pp.261-184.
  • Hsu,F.L.K.,1953,Americans and Chinese:Two Ways of Life,New York:Abelard-Schuman.
  • Hsu,F.L.K.,1963,Clan,Caste & Club,New York:Van Nostrand/Reinhold Co.
  • Hsu,F.L.K.,1971,“Psychosocial Homeostasis and Jen:Conceptual Tools for Advancing Psychological Anthropology,American Anthropologist,No.73,pp.23-44.
  • Hsu,F.L.K.,1965,“The Effect of Dominant Kinship Relationships on Kin and Non-Kin Behavior:A Hypothesis”,American Anthropologist,No.67,pp.638-661.
  • Hsu,F.L.K.,1985,“The Self in Cross-Cultural Perspective”,in A.J.Marsella,G.DeVos,& F.L.K.Hsu(Eds.),Culture and Self:Asian and Western Perspectives,NewYork:Tavistock,pp.24-55.
  • Hsu,F.L.K. 1985,The Selp in Cross-Cultural Perspective,in A.J.Marseua,G.Devos & F.L.K.Hsu(Eds),Culture and Self.Asian and Westen Perspeetive. New York:Tavisfock,pp.24-55.
  • Husserl,E.,1936/1970,The Crisis of European Sciences and the Transcendental Phenomenology,Trans.by D.Carr.Evanston,Ill.:Northwestern University Press.
  • Hwang,K.K.,2000,“Chinese Recafionelism:Theorefical Construction and Methodocogical Considerations,” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour,30(2).pp.155-178.
  • Hwang,K.K.,1987,“Face and Favor:the Chinese Power Game”,American Journal of Sociology,Vol.92,No.4,pp.944-974.
  • Hwang,K.K.,1999,“Filial Piety and Loyalty:Two Types of Social Identification in Confucianism”,Asian Journal of Social Psychology,No.2,pp.163-183.
  • Hwang,K.K.,1997,“Guanxi and Mientze:Conflict Resolution in Chinese Society”,Intercultural Communication Studies,Vol.VII:I,17-37.
  • Hwang,K.K.,1998,“Two Moralities:Reinterpreting the Finding of Empirical Research on Moral Reasoning in Taiwan”,Asian Journal of Social Psychology,No.1,pp.211-238.
  • Kayser,E.,Schwinger,T.,and Cohen,R.L.,1984,“Laypersons’ Conceptions of Social Relationships:A Test of Contract Theory”,Journal of Social and Personal Relationships,No.1,pp.433-458.
  • Kohlberg,L.,1981,The Philosophy of Moral Development:Moral Stages and the Idea of Sustice,San Francisco:Harper & Row.
  • Kohlberg,L.,1981,The Psychology of Moral Development:The Nature and Validity of Moral Stages,San Francisco:Harper & Row.
  • Kuhn,T.,1962/1990,The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,Chicago:The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakatos,L.,1978/1990,The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,Cambridge University Press.
  • Lauden,L.,1978/1992,Progress and its Problem:Toward a Theory of Scientific Growth,New Dehli:Ambika Publications.
  • Lerner,M.J.,1977,“The Justice Motive:Some Hypotheses as to its Origins and Forms”,Journal of Personality,No.45,pp.1-52.
  • Lerner,M.J.,1981,“The Justice Motive in Human Relations:Some Thoughts on What We Know and Need to Know about Justice”,in M.Lerner and S.C.Lerner(Ed.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior:Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change,New York:Plenum Press,pp.11-35.
  • Lerner,M.J.,1975,“The Justice Motive in Social Behavior:Introduction”,Journal of Social Issues,No.31,pp.1-19.
  • Leventhal,G.S.,1976a,“The Distribution of Reward and Resources in Groups and Organizations”,Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,Vol.9,L.Berkowitz(Ed.),New York:Academic,pp.91-131.
  • Leventhal,G.S.,1976b,“Fairness in Social Relationships”,in J.Thibaut,J.T.Spence,and R.T.Carson(Eds.),Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology,Morristown,N.J.:General Learning Press,pp.211-239.
  • Leventhal,G.S.,1980,“What Should Be Done with Equity Theory?”,in K.J.Gergen,M.S.Greenberg,and R.H.Willis(Eds.),Social Exchange:Advances in Theory and Research,New York:Plenum Press,pp.27-55.
  • Levi-Strauss,C.,1961,A World on the Wane,Trans by John Rusell,London:Hutchnson.
  • Levi-Strauss,C.,1963,Structural Anthropology,Trans.by C.Jacobson and B.G.Schoepf,New York:Basic Books.
  • Mills,J.,and Clark,E.S.,1982,“Exchange and Communal Relationships”,in L.Wheeler(Ed.),Review of Personality and Social Psychology,Vol.3.,Bevely Hills,CA:Sage,pp.121-144.
  • Piaget,J.,1979/1984,Le structuralisme,Presses Universitaires de France,Paris.
  • Popper,K.K.,1972/1989,Objective Knowledge:An Evolutionary Approach,Oxford:Oxford University Press.
  • Putnam,H.,1978,Meaning and the Moral Science,London:Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • Reis,H.T.,1984,“The Multidimensionality of Justice”,in R.Folger(Ed.),The Sence of Injustice:Social Psychological Perspectives,New York:Plenum Press.
  • Sampson,E.E.,1981,“Social Change and the Contexts of Justice Motivation”,in M.J. Lernerand S.C.Lerner(Eds.),The Justice Motive in Social Behavior,New York:Plenum Press,pp.97-124.
  • Schutz,A.,1962,“Common-Sense and Scientific Interpretation of Human Action”,Collected Papers,Vol.1:The Problem of Social Reality,The Hague:Martinus Nijhoff.
  • Schwinger,T.,1986,“The Need Principle of Distributive Justice”,in H.W.Bierhoff,R.L.Cohen,and J.Greenberg(Eds.)Justice in Social Relation,New York:Plenum Press,pp.211-255.
  • Shweder,R.A.,Mahapatra,M. & Miller,J.G.,1990,“Culture and Moral Development”,in J.Stiger,R.A.Sweder,and Herdt(Eds.),Cultural Psychology:Essays on Comparative Human Development,New York:Cambridge University Press,pp.130-204.
  • Stogdill,R.M.,1974,Handbook of Leadership:A Survey of Theory and Research,New York:Free Press.
  • Toulmin,S.,1970/1993,“Does the Distinction between Normal and Revolutionary Science Hold Water?” in I.Lakatos and A.Musgrave(Eds.),Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge:Proceedings of the International Colloquinm in the Philosophy of Science,Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.
  • Wallner,F.,1993/1997,Introduction to Constructive Realism.
  • Wittgenstein,L.,1945/1986,Philosophical Investigation,Ed. and Tr.by G.E.M.Anscombe,New York:Macmillan.

儒家关系主义的理论建构及其方法论基础

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥4.12 查看全文 >

VIP免费

章节目录

  • 一 引言
  • 二 关系主义的方法论基础
    1. (一)个体、自我与人
    2. (二)建构实在论
  • 三 “人情与面子”的理论模型
    1. (一)理论模型的建构
      1. 1.关系与行动
      2. 2.谈话架构与社会交换
      3. 3.拉关系与滋生之性质
    2. (二)科学实在论:方法论的考量
      1. 1.认识进化论
      2. 2.趋同实在论
      3. 3.科学的演化
      4. 4.科学研究纲领
      5. 5.实践性的外推策略
  • 四 儒家文化的分析
    1. (一)语言与语言游戏
    2. (二)儒家的庶人伦理:“仁、义、礼”伦理体系
    3. (三)五伦的结构
    4. (四)跨时性的结构
  • 五 关系中的人们
    1. (一)差序格局
    2. (二)心理社会图
      1. 1.心理群性内衡
      2. 2.Galilean的人性观
    3. (三)“微世界”之间的外推
  • 六 华人社会中的冲突化解模式
  • 七 结论:解决问题的效力

章节图片/图表

查看更多>>>