论文

广义应急管理的理论框架

摘要

以往针对突发事件的应急管理是狭义的,以公共安全为目标的应急管理则是广义的。以公共安全治理为目标实现应急管理由狭义向广义的超越,既是应急管理实践突破瓶颈的内在需求,也是面向风险社会提升公共安全保障能力的必然选择。狭义应急管理的理论基础是“三角模型”,强调对象上的全灾害管理、过程上的全过程管理、结构上的多主体参与。广义应急管理即公共安全治理的理论基础则是“三棱锥模型”,它在“三角模型”的基础上,还特别强调公共安全作为结果的实现程度。为此,要将公共安全作为优先的政策目标,通过多元参与和过程互动来推动风险治理、应急管理和危机治理的协同发展,达致公共安全治理目标、手段和结果的有机统一,以应对新兴风险、极端灾害和跨界危机的挑战。相应的案例分析显示,在中国的制度情境中,“三棱锥模型”具有适用性。以公共安全治理实现应急管理由狭义向广义的超越,这是一次整体性改革,需要从国家战略的高度予以规划。

作者

张海波 ,南京大学政府管理学院教授,博士生导师,副院长,江苏省中安应急管理研究院理事长,南京大学社会风险与公共危机管理研究中心(江苏省社会风险管理研究基地)执行主任,南京大学数据智能与交叉创新实验室副主任,CSSCI集刊《风险灾害危机研究》执行主编,国家社科基金重大项目“提升我国应急管理体系与能力现代化水平研究”首席专家。研究领域为应急管理(危机管理/风险管理)、公共安全、社会治理等。出版著作《中国应急管理:理论、实践、政策》《中国转型期公共危机治理》《公共安全管理:整合与重构》《中国转型期的社会风险及识别》等。
童星 ,南京大学政府管理学院教授、博士生导师,南京大学社会风险和公共危机管理研究中心主任,江苏省社会风险研究基地主任。

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • [1]张海波,童星.中国应急管理的结构变化及其理论概化[J].中国社会科学,2015,3.
  • [2]张海波.论“应急失灵”[J].行政论坛,2017,3.
  • [3]U.S. National Governors’ Association. Center for Policy Research. Comprehensive Emergency Management:A Governor’s Guide[J]. 1979.
  • [4]Wise C. R. Organizing for Homeland Security after Katrina:Is Adaptive Management What’s Missing?[J]. Public Administration Review,2006,66(3):302-318.
  • [5]竹中平藏,船桥洋一,竹中平,林光江.日本“3·11”大地震的启示:复合型灾害与危机管理[M].北京:新华出版社,2012.
  • [6]Prince S. H. Catastrophe and social change:based upon a sociological study of the Halifax disaster[J]. London P.s.king & Son Ltd,1920.
  • [7]White G. F. Human adjustment to floods[J]. University of Chicago,1945.
  • [8]Comfort L. K.,Springer C. G. Emergency Management Research and Practice in Public Administration:Emergence,Evolution,Expansion,and Future Directions [with Commentary][J]. Public Administration Review,2016,72(4):539-547.
  • [9]FEMA,Integrated Emergency Management System:Process Overview[R]. September 1983.
  • [10]Drabek T. E. Managing the Emergency Response[J]. Public Administration Review,1985,45(4):85-92.
  • [11]May P. J. FEMA’s Role in Emergency Management:Examining Recent Experience[J]. Public Administration Review,1985,45:40-48.
  • [12][德]乌尔里希·贝克.什么是全球化?全球主义的曲解——应对全球化[M].华东师范大学出版社,2008.
  • [13]U. Beck,Risk Society:Towards a New Modernity[J]. London:Sage Publications,1992,p.44.
  • [14]Ullman R. H. Redefining Security[J]. International Security,1983,8(1):129-153.
  • [15]B. Buzan,People,States,and Fear,the National Security Problem in International Relations[M]. Brighton:Wheatsheaf Books,1983.
  • [16]Leveson N. A new accident model for engineering safer systems[J]. Safety Science,2004,42(4):237-270. Aven T. What is safety science?[J]. Safety Science,2014,67(67):15-20.
  • [17]Aven T. What is safety science?[J]. Safety Science,2014,67(67):15-20.
  • [18]朱伟,刘梦婷.安全概念再认识:从间接到直接[J].风险灾害危机研究,2017(1).
  • [19]Giddens A. Runaway World:How Globalization Is Shaping Our Lives[J]. Profile Books,2000,46(2):170-176.
  • [20]C. Perrow,Normal Accident:Living with High-Risk Technology[M],New York:Basic Books,1984.
  • [21]Cutter S. L.,Barnes L.,Berry M.,et al. A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters[J]. Global Environmental Change,2008,18(4):598-606.
  • [22]张海波.中国总体国家安全观下的安全治理与应急管理[J].中国行政管理,2016,4.
  • [23]童星,张海波.基于中国问题的灾害管理分析框架[J].中国社会科学,2010(1):132-146.
  • [24]Luhmann N. Risk:A sociological theory[J]. American Journal of Sociology,1993. p.28.
  • [25]Kasperson R. E.,Renn O,Slovic P,et al. The social amplification of risk:A conceptual framework[J]. Risk Analysis,1988,8(2):177-187.
  • [26]Renn O. Risk Governance:Coping With Uncertainty in a Complex World[M].//Risk governance:coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Earthscan,2008. p.367.
  • [27]IRGC,Improving Management of Emerging Risk,[EB/OL]. https://www.irgc.org/risk governance/emerging-risk/risk-management-in-industry/,2011.
  • [28]Comfort L. K. Rethinking Security:Organizational Fragility in Extreme Events[J]. Public Administration Review,2002,62(Supplement s1):98-107.
  • [29]Tierney K. Disaster Governance:Social,Political,and Economic Dimensions[J]. Annual Review of Environment & Resources,2012,37(12):341-363.
  • [30]Rosenthal U.,Boin A.,Comfort L. K. Managing crises:Threats,Dilemmas,Opportunities[J]. Charles C Thomas Publisher LTD. 2001,281-296.
  • [31]Moynihan D. P. The Network Governance of Crisis Response:Case Studies of Incident Command Systems[J]. Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory,2009,19(4):895-915.
  • [32]Moynihan D. P. Learning under Uncertainty:Networks in Crisis Management[J]. Public Administration Review,2008,68(2):350-365.
  • [33]张海波.风险社会视野中的公共管理变革[J].南京大学学报(哲学·人文科学·社会科学),2017(4):57-65.
  • [34]Enrico Quarantelli,“Catastrophes are Different from Disasters:Some Implications for Crisis Planning Drawn from Katrina,” Understanding Katrina:Perspective form the Social Science[EB/OL],http://understandingkatrina.ssrc.org/Quarantelli/. 2006.
  • [35]Ansell C.,Boin A,Keller A. Managing Transboundary Crises:Identifying the Building Blocks of an Effective Response System[J]. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management,2010,18(4):195-207.
  • [36]OECD. Emerging Systemic Risks in the 21st Century:An Agenda for Action[J]. International Futures Programme OECD,2003.
  • [37]Comfort L. K. Shared Risk:Complex Systems in Seismic Response[J]. 1999.
  • [38]Department of Homeland Security,National Response Plan[G],December 2004.
  • [39]U. Rosenthal,21st Century Mega-Crises:New Challenges to Crisis Management[R],Presentation on International Conference on Risk,Crisis and Public Management,Nanjing,September 26-28,Nanjing.
  • [40]Howitt A. M.,Leonard H. B.,Giles D. Managing crises:responses to large-scale emergencies[M]. CQ Press,2009.
  • [41]KG Provan,RH Lemaire. Core Concepts and Key Ideas for Understanding Public Sector Organizational Networks:Using Research to Inform Scholarship and Practice[J]. Public Administration Review,2012,72(5),638-648.
  • [42]Comfort L. K.,Ko K.,Zagorecki A. Coordination in rapidly evolving disaster response systems:the role of information[J]. American Behavioral Scientist,2004,48(3):295-313.
  • [43]Boin A.,Busuioc M.,Groenleer M. Building European Union capacity to manage transboundary crises:Network or lead‐agency model?[J]. Regulation & Governance,2014,8(4):418-436.
  • [44]Starr C. Risk Management,Assessment,and Acceptability[J]. Risk Analysis,1985,5(2):97-102.
  • [45]Baldwin,David A. The concept of security[M]. Human and Water Security in Israel and Jordan. 1997:5-26.
  • [46]丁翔,张海波.大数据与公共安全:概念、维度与关系[J].中国行政管理,2017(8).
  • [47]曼瑟尔·奥尔森,奥尔森,陈郁,等.集体行动的逻辑[M].上海:格致出版社,2014.
  • [48]张德勇.熔断机制的是与非[J].中国青年报,2016,2.
  • [49]新华网.国务院调查组天津港“8·12”瑞海公司危险品仓库特别重大火灾爆炸事故调查报告[EB/OL].http://news.xinhuanet.com/local/2016-02/05/c_128706930.htm?&sfc=qzone,2016-2-5.
  • [50]张海波.全面改革窗口期的信访制度改革[J].南京社会科学,2016(2):77-85.
  • [51]张海波,童星.社会管理创新与信访制度改革[J].天津社会科学,2012,03(3):58-63.
  • [52]人民网.中央发文:不简单以信访数量多少进行考评[EB/OL].http://politics.people.com.cn/n/2014/0226/c70731-24464079.html,2014-2-26.
  • [53]Morton J. F. Next-Generation Homeland Security:Network Federalism and the Course to National Preparedness[M]. Naval Institute Press,2014.
  • [54]Fukuyama F. Identity and migration[J]. Prospect,2007.

广义应急管理的理论框架

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥10.03 查看全文 >

VIP免费

论文目录

  • 一 引言
  • 二 狭义应急管理:“三角模型”
  • 三 公共安全为目标的广义应急管理:“三棱锥模型”
    1. (一)公共安全:目标、手段与结果的统一
    2. (二)公共安全治理:从部分中生成整体
    3. (三)公共安全治理的“三棱锥模型”:维度与超越
      1. 1.对象:从全灾害到灾害的复杂性
      2. 2.过程:从应急生命周期到“风险-灾害-危机”连续统
      3. 3.结构:从多主体参与到多主体协同
      4. 4.结果:从忽视结果到目标、过程和结果的有机统一
  • 四 “三棱锥模型”与中国情境:三个案例
    1. 1.案例1:2016年股市熔断机制
    2. 2.案例2:2015年天津滨海新区爆炸
    3. 3.案例3:信访总量考核
  • 五 中国的公共安全治理:总体战略与实践路径

论文图片/图表

查看更多>>>