- TA的作品
- 作品笔记(0)
- 作品书评(3)
-
陈国平 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 2022年05月 出版
关键词：
简 介：本书总结了2021年人民法院信息化建设成效和面临的问题，展望了2022年法院信息化建设前景，从智慧审判、智慧诉讼服务、智慧执行和司法大数据四个维度对全国3500余家法院的信息化建设进展情况进行了评估。此外，书中电子诉讼实践板块介绍了北京、山东等法院电子诉讼平台建设情况；智慧审判执行板块突出了江西、吉林、广东、江苏、浙江等地法院将最新科技运用于审判执行的工作成效；智慧审判管理板块展示了河南、河北、上海等地法院加强审判监督、为审判人员“智慧画像”等做法；智慧社会治理板块总结了四川、重庆等多家法院运用智慧手段参与社会治理的创新举措。
¥ 139 试读
-
-
实证法学研究（第6期） 收藏
田禾 吕艳滨 主编 王祎茗 执行主编 2021年12月 出版
关键词： 实证分析;社会治理;法治化
简 介：《实证法学研究（第六期）》对经济法基础理论研究中的实证分析方法进行了研究，并围绕环境保护法治、诉源治理问题进行了分析。本期还围绕统一法律适用、司法行政人员动态配置、智慧司法、社会治理等问题进行了实证分析，特别是以“基层治理司法指数”的构建分析了司法大数据在基层治理中的运用。同时，为鼓励青年学者开展实证研究，还开辟了“青年法苑”栏目，刊发了关于老年人数字鸿沟法治应对、残疾人权利保障问题的文章。
¥ 59.4 试读
-
关键词： 卫生法治;医疗保障;医政医管;纠纷化解
简 介：本书在新时代背景下，从医疗卫生机构、医务人员、基本医疗保险、健康老龄化、中医中药等方面，聚焦法治热点，梳理了中国近年来卫生领域法治建设的探索与经验。书中就控烟法治、健康老龄化、食品药品依法治理等推出一系列专题报告；卫生相关的侵权责任、损害赔偿与纠纷化解是卫生法治的重要组成部分，书中从立法规范、司法审判、大数据分析等多角度进行研讨。
¥ 83.4 试读
-
李林 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 栗燕杰 副主编 2021年12月 出版
关键词： 地方法治;法治政府;司法审判;法治社会
简 介：本书回顾了中国各地法治改革的做法、经验和成效，并对今后前景进行展望。全书对包括北京、上海、天津、浙江、山东、福建、贵州等地的地方立法、法治政府、司法建设、法治社会等方面的探索创新进行了个案式或比较式的提炼、总结和分析。书中还就法治化营商环境、政务公开与政务新媒体、地方广告立法执法、工程建设领域民事司法与行政执法衔接、多元纠纷化解与诉源治理等热点前沿问题进行了专题研讨。
¥ 83.4 试读
-
-
-
辽宁法治发展报告（No.1·2021） 收藏
作者： 李林 林志敏 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 出版时间：2021年12月
简 介：本书从总体上分析辽宁省2020年全面依法治省工作成效的同时，还分析了设区的市开展地方立法的成效与面临的问题，总结了辽宁省法治政府建设的现状，从海洋法治建设、渔业法治建设、邮政快递业法治建设、科技创新法治建设等角度分析了有关行业法治建设的成效，从司法行政发展状况、普法工作开展情况、人民法院发挥审判职能、推进法治政府建设等方面总结了辽宁司法机关建设情况。书中还从社会治理法治化角度对辽宁省法治发展状况进行了总结分析，指出了存在的不足，并就如何进一步推进全面依法治省工作提出了建议。
¥ 83.4 试读
-
-
-
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Judicial Big Data” in Chinese Courts （2019） 收藏
作者： 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 出版时间：2020年10月
关键词：
出处： 中国法院信息化发展报告（No.4·2020）（英文版）
简 介：In 2019，courts at all levels paid close attention to data quality，ensured the accuracy and security of data，continuously improved data sharing，and deeply promoted judicial big data application，so as to provide support for serving social management innovation and strengthening smart management of the courts with judicial big data.
¥ 21.87 试读
-
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Smart Enforcement” in Chinese Courts （2019）* 收藏
作者： 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 出版时间：2020年10月
关键词：
出处： 中国法院信息化发展报告（No.4·2020）（英文版）
简 介：The year 2019 was the first year for the Outline of the Fifth Five-Year Reform Program of the People’s Courts （2019—2023） to be implemented，and also the first year for the newly revised Five-Year Plan for Information-Based Construction in People’s Courts （2019—2023） to put into effect. Besides，it also marked the turning point for the people’s courts to switch the goal from a basic solution to an effective solution to enforcement difficulties. An important policy decision and arrangement was clearly made at the Fourth Plenary Session of the 18th CPC Central Committee that “enforcement difficulties shall be effectively solved” and that “the rights and interests of prevailing parties shall be guaranteed in a timely manner in accordance with law.” As far as the people’s courts are concerned，resolving the difficulties of enforcement is not an overnight solution，but a long-term systematic project. In March 2016，the Supreme People’s Court set the goal of “using two to three years to basically solve the enforcement difficulties”. After three years of unremitting efforts by the people’s courts across the country，as of the end of 2018，the people’s courts had undergone historic changes in enforcement and achieved leapfrog development. In this historical process，the information technology has played a vital role. In recent years，in the context of the national big data strategy，court informatization has progressed by leaps and bounds，promoting the reform of trial and enforcement mode and also alleviating to some extent the pressure of “few judges for many cases” in the people’s courts. Compared with the trial，the enforcement involves a vast geographic area and fragmented routine work，which provide a broader space for the information technology to play a role in. From inquiry and control of property subject to enforcement，handling and management of enforcement cases and a unified command of enforcement actions，to auction and disposition of property，joint credit discipline of dishonest judgment debtors and remote commissioning of enforcement matters，the information system has been playing a revolutionary role. It has not only improved the quality and efficiency of enforcement，but also reformed the system and mode of enforcement，and reshaped the ecological system of the enforcement in the people’s courts.
¥ 38.88 试读
-
Third-Party Evaluation Report on “Smart Trial” in Chinese Courts （2019） 收藏
作者： 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 出版时间：2020年10月
关键词：
出处： 中国法院信息化发展报告（No.4·2020）（英文版）
简 介：Trial is one of the core tasks of the people’s courts，and “smart trial” is the focus and challenge in court informatization. The report of the Fourth Plenary Session of the 19th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China stressed that “we should establish and improve the rules and regulations for administrative management by using Internet，big data，artificial intelligence and other technical means. We should build a digital government and strengthen data sharing in an orderly manner”. The people’s courts also need to improve the intelligence level in the trial. In 2019，the people’s courts made a lot of effective attempts and efforts to improve the quality and efficiency of trial，serve judges in handling cases，serve judicial assistants and establish online litigation rules. Relying on big data resources and by providing support for judges to inquire and refer to similar cases，the people’s courts have made efforts to ensure accurate ascertainment of facts and correct application of laws，and promote unification of judgment standards. The people’s courts have provided more intelligent services for judges in handling cases through digital judicial committees. By building an electronic file management system and interfacing with the case handling platform，they have effectively solved the file transferring difficulties. Furthermore，by assisting judges in reading files，producing documents，and examining and approving the circulation，the people’s courts have effectively improved trial efficiency and eased the pressure of trial.
¥ 25.52 试读
-
of Chinese Courts in and Outlook for 2020 收藏
作者： 陈甦 田禾 主编 吕艳滨 执行主编 胡昌明 副主编 出版时间：2020年10月
关键词：
出处： 中国法院信息化发展报告（No.4·2020）（英文版）
简 介：The development of court informatization is a major initiative by the people’s courts to implement the strategy for invigorating China through the Internet. The people’s courts at all levels have firmly grasped the major historical opportunities brought about by the new round of scientific and technological revolution，such as invigorating China through the Internet and building a digital China and a smart society. The courts have made full use of big data，cloud computing，artificial intelligence and other modern scientific and technological means to solve reform problems，enhance judicial efficiency，and promote judicial reform and intelligence and informatization development of the people’s courts；and they have provided strong scientific and technological support to promote the modernization of the trial system and trial capacity.
¥ 37.66 试读
-
《实证法学研究》约稿函 收藏
作者： 中国社会科学院法学研究所 中国社会科学院国家法治指数研究中心 主办 田禾 吕艳滨 主编 王小梅 执行主编 出版时间：2019年10月
关键词：
出处： 实证法学研究（第3期）
简 介：改革开放以来，中国法学研究和法治建设取得了举世瞩目的成就。党的十八届三中全会提出，“建设科学的法治建设指标体系和考评标准”，党的十八届四中全会吹响了全面推进依法治国的新号角，《中共中央关于全面推进依法治国若干重大问题的决定》明确提出，重要立法事项引入第三方评估，将风险评估、合法性审查确定为重大行政决策的必经程序。近年来，我国法学研究人员和法律工作者积极投身法治中国建设，形成了一系列重要理论和实证研究成果，对推动我国法治进步作出了重要贡献。 法学研究应当以推动社会发展进步为己任。为加强实证法学研究，凝聚学界共识，推动实证法学研究的理论发展，团结学界同人更好地参与法治建设实践，中国社会科学院法学研究所编撰出版《实证法学研究》，以期形成中国实证法学研究的综合性、权威性、创新性平台，打造中国实证法学的权威理论园地。
¥ 0.77 试读
2021/04/23 03:59发布了书评
好书
2021/04/12 09:12发布了书评
刷新了知识
2021/04/12 08:58发布了书评
刷新了知识
