参考文献 查看全部 ↓

• Emily Apter，The Translation Zone：A New Comparative Literature，Princeton：Princeton UP，2006.
• Erich Auerbach，“Figura” Neue Dantestudien（Istanbuler Schriften 5），Istanbul：I Horoz，1944.
• Erich Auerbach，Literary Language and Its Public in Late Latin Antiquity and in the Middle Ages，trans. Ralph Manheim，Princeton：Princeton UP，1965.
• Erich Auerbach，Literatursprache und Publikum in der lateinischen Spatantike und im Mittelalter，Bern：A. Francke，AG. Verlag，1958.
• Erich Auerbach，Mimesis：Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendlandischen Literatur，Bern：A. Francke AG. Verlag，1946.
• Erich Auerbach，Mimesis：The Representation of Reality in Western Literature，trans. Willard R. Trask. Princeton：Princeton UP，2003.
• Erich Auerbach，“Philology and Weltliteratur，” trans. Maire and Edward Said，The Centennial Review，Vol.13，No.1.
• Erich Auerbach，Scenes from the Drama of European Literature，New York：Meridian Books，1959.
• Timothy Bahti，Allegories of History：Literary Historiography after Hegel，Baltimore：The Johns Hopkins UP，1992.
• Erich Auerbach，“Vico，Auerbach，and Literary History，” in Vico：Past and Present，ed. Giorgio Tagliacozzo，Atlantic Highlands：Humanities Press，1981.
• Paul A.Bove，Intellectuals in Power：A Genealogy of Critical Humanism，New York：Columbia UP，1986.
• David Carroll，“Mimesis Reconsidered：Literature，History，Ideology，” Diacritics，Vol.5，No.2，1975.
• Ernst Robert Curtius，European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages，trans.Willard R.Trask，New York：Harper and Row，1963.
• Ernst Robert Curtius，“Die Lehre von den drei Stilen in Altertum und Mittelalter，” Romanische Forschungen，Band 64，Heft 1，Frankfurt am Mein，1952.
• David Damrosch，“Auerbach in Exile，” Comparative Literature，Vol.47，No.2，1995.
• Ludwig Edelstein，“Rev. of Mimesis：Dargestellte Wirklichkeit in der abendlandischen Literatur，” by Erich Auerbach，Modern Language Notes，Vol.65，No.6，1950.
• Fergusson Francis，“Two Perspectives on European Literature，” The Hudson Review，Vol.7，No.1，1954.
• Jesse M.Gellrich，“Figura，Allegory，and the Question of History，” in Literary History and the Challenge of Philology：The Legacy of Erich Auerbach，ed. Seth Lerer，Stanford：Stanford UP，1996.
• Geoffrey Green，Literary Criticism and the Structures of History：Erich Auerbach and Leo Spitzer，Lincoln：U of Nebraska P，1982.
• W.Wolfgang Holdheim，“The Hermeneutic Significance of Auerbach’s Ansatz，” New Literary History，Vol.16，No.3，1985.
• Fredric Jameson，The Political Unconscious：Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act，Ithaca：Cornell UP，1981.
• Djelal Kadir，Memos from the Besieged City：Lifelines for Cultural Sustainability，Stanford：Stanford UP，2011.
• Kader Konuk，East West Mimesis：Auerbach in Turkey，Stanford：Stanford UP，2010.
• Harry Levin，“Two Romanisten in America，” in Grounds for Comparison，Cambridge：Harvard UP，1972.
• Georg Lukacs，The Theory of the Novel，trans. Anna Bostock，Cambridge：MIT Press，1971.
• Paul De Man，The Rhetoric of Romanticism，New York：Columbia UP，1984.
• Charles Muscatine，“Erich Auerbach，Mimesis，” in Medieval Literature，Style，and Culture，Columbia：U of South Carolina P，1999.
• James I.Porter，“Erich Auerbach and the Judaizing of Philology，” Critical Inquiry，Vol.35，No.1，2008.
• Jill Robbins，Prodigal Son/Elder Brother：Interpretation and Alterity in Augustine，Petrarch，Kafka，Levinas，Chicago：U of Chicago P，1991.
• Edward Said，The World，the Text，and the Critic，London：Vintage，1991.
• Azade Seyhan，“German Academic Exiles in Istanbul：Translation as the Bildung of the Other，” in Nation，Language and the Ethics of Translation，ed. Sandra L. Bermann and Michael Wood，Princeton：Princeton UP，2005.
• Leo Spitzer，“Linguistics and Literary History，” in Linguistics and Literary History：Essays in Stylistics，Princeton：Princeton UP，1948.
• Claus Uhlig，“Auerbach’s ‘Hidden’（？） Theory of History，” in Literary History and the Challenge of Philology：The Legacy of Erich Auerbach，ed. Seth Lerer，Stanford：Stanford UP，1996.
• Giambattista Vico，Die neue Wissenschaft uber die gemeinschaftliche Natur der Volker，trans. Erich Auerbach，Munich：Allgemeine Verlaganstalt，1924.
• Rene Wellek，“Auerbach’s Special Realism，” The Kenyan Review，Vol.16，No.2，1954.
• Hayden White，Figural Realism：Studies in the Mimesis Effect，Baltimore：The Johns Hopkins UP，1999.