论文

文化混搭中的决策心理

摘要

文化混搭是两种或两种以上的文化或文化符号同时呈现的现象。本文探讨了文化混搭情境中的个体决策过程。首先检视了文化混搭中“文化”的意义,并提出文化的层次性、社会建构性、个体建构性,以及潜在的冲突、融合性是文化混搭情境中文化的特点。然后,在决策的认知层面,本文以决策心理学最近发展出的综合性理论——一般易评估性理论为框架,分析了决策者在评价混搭文化时如何受到文化的属性和层次、评估方式,以及决策者个人知识的影响。之后,在决策的动机层面,本文以意义维持模型与专注理论两方面的文献分析了决策者面临混搭情境的意义建构过程和策略。最后,对本文提出的观点做总结,并指明本文的不足和未能涉及的其他问题。

作者

谢天 ,心理学博士,外国哲学博士后,武汉大学哲学学院心理学系副教授、硕士生导师。中国社会心理学会理事、中国心理学会社会心理学分会理事,中国社会心理学会文化心理学分会秘书长,Asian Journal of Social Psychology编委(2021~2023年)。从事社会心理学研究,主要研究方向为文化心理、决策与谈判心理等,主持和参与国内外及省部级项目多项。在国内核心期刊,如《心理学报》《心理科学》《心理科学进展》《应用心理学》等,以及国外SSCI期刊,如Journal of CrossCultural Psychology, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, Public Personnel Management等,以第一作者或通讯作者身份发表论文多篇。电子信箱:thanksky520@126.com

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • 侯玉波、张梦,2012,《文化“动态建构”的理论和证据》,《西南大学学报》(社会科学版)第4期,第83~89页。
  • 兰格,2007,《专注力》,徐佳译,北京:中国人民大学出版社。
  • 彭璐珞,2013,《理解消费者对文化混搭的态度:一个文化分域的视角》,北京大学光华管理学院博士学位论文。
  • 皮亚杰,1981,《发生认识论原理》,宪钿译,北京:商务印书馆。
  • 吴莹、杨宜音、赵志裕,2014,《全球化背景下的文化排斥反应》,《心理科学进展》第4期,第721~730页。
  • 杨晓莉、刘力、张笑笑,2010,《双文化个体的文化框架转换:影响因素与结果》,《心理科学进展》第5期,第840~848页。
  • Alexander,C.N.,Langer,E.J.,Newman,R.I.,Chandler,H.M.,& Davies,J.L.(1989). Transcendental meditation,mindfulness,and longevity:An experimental study with the elderly. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57(6),950-964.
  • Atran,S.,& Ginges,J.(2012). Religious and sacred imperatives in human conflict. Science,336(6083),855-857.
  • Balaji,P.A.,Varne,S.R.,& Ali,S.S.(2012). Physiological effects of yogic practices and transcendental meditation in health and disease. North American Journal of Medical Sciences,4(10),442-448.
  • Baumeister,R.F.(1991). Meanings of life. New York,NY:Guilford.
  • Benet-Martínez,V.,Leu,J.,Lee,F.,& Morris,M.W.(2002). Negotiating biculturalism cultural frame switching in biculturals with oppositional versus compatible cultural identities. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,33(5),492-516.
  • Berry,J.W.(1990).Psychology of acculturation.In J.Berman(Ed.),Nebraska symposium on motivation.Vol.37:Cross-cultural perspectives(pp.201-234).Lincoln:University of Nebraska Press.
  • Berry,J.W.(1997). Immigration,acculturation,and adaptation. Applied Psychology,46(1),5-34.
  • Berry,J.W.,Phinney,J.S.,Sam,D.L.,& Vedder,P.(2006). Immigrant youth:Acculturation,identity,and adaptation. Applied Psychology,55(3),303-332.
  • Briley,D.A.,Morris,M.W.,& Simonson,I.(2000). Reasons as carriers of culture:Dynamic versus dispositional models of cultural influence on decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research,27(2),157-178.
  • Chanowitz,B.,& Langer,E.J.(1981). Premature cognitive commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,41(6),1051-1063.
  • Cheng,C.Y.,Leung,A.K.,& Wu,T.Y.(2011). Going beyond the multicultural experience-creativity link:The mediating role of emotions. Journal of Social Issues,67(4),806-824.
  • Chiu,C.-y.,Gelfand,M.J.,Yamagishi,T.,Shteynberg,G.,& Wan,C.(2010). Intersubjective culture the role of intersubjective perceptions in cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science,5(4),482-493.
  • Chiu,C.-y.,Gries,P.,Torelli,C.J.,& Cheng,S.Y.(2011). Toward a social psychology of globalization. Journal of Social Issues,67(4),663-676.
  • Chiu,C-y.,& Hong,Y-y.(2007). Cultural processes:Basic principles.In E.T.Higgins,& A.E.Kruglanski(Eds.),Social psychology:Handbookof basic principles(pp.785-806).New York:Guilford Press.
  • Chiu,C.Y.,& Qiu,L.(2014). Communication and culture:A complexity theory approach. Asian Journal of Social Psychology,17(2),108-111.
  • Eid,M.,& Diener,E.(2001). Norms for experiencing emotions in different cultures:Inter-and intranational differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81(5),869-885.
  • Furnham,A.(2003). Belief in a just world:Research progress over the past decade. Personality and Individual Differences,34(5),795-817.
  • Gelfand,M.J.,& Realo,A.(1999). Individualism-collectivism and accountability in intergroup negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology,84(5),721-736.
  • Greenfield,P.M.(2013). The changing psychology of culture from 1800 through 2000. Psychological Science,24(9),1722-1731.
  • Hart,R.,Ivtzan,I.,& Hart,D.(2013). Mind the gap in mindfulness research:A comparative account of the leading schools of thought. Review of General Psychology,17(4),453-466.
  • Heine,S.J.,Proulx,T.,& Vohs,K.D.(2006). The meaning maintenance model:On the coherence of social motivations. Personality and Social Psychology Review,10(2),88-110.
  • Hofstede,G.(1980). Culture’s consequences:International differences in work-related values.Beverly Hills,CA:Sage.
  • Hofstede,G.,Hofstede,G.J.,& Minkov,M.(2010). Cultures and organizations:Software of the mind(3rd ed.).New York:McGraw-Hill.
  • Hong,Y.-y.,Fang,Y.,Yang,Y.,& Phua,D.Y.(2013). Cultural attachment:A new theory and method to understand cross-cultural competence. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,44(6),1024-1044.
  • Hong,Y.-y.,Morris,M.W.,Chiu,C.-y.,& Benet-Martínez,V.(2000). Multicultural minds:A dynamic constructivist approach to culture and cognition. American Psychologist,55(7),709-720.
  • Hsee,C.K.(1996). The evaluability hypothesis:An explanation for preference reversals between joint and separate evaluations of alternatives. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,67(3),247-257.
  • Hsee,C.K.(1998). Less is better:When low-value options are valued more highly than high-value options. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,11(2),107-121.
  • Hsee,C.K.,& Zhang,J.(2004). Distinction bias:Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86(5),680-695.
  • Hsee,C.K.,& Zhang,J.(2010). General evaluability theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science,5(4),343-355.
  • Ie,A.,Ngnoumen,C.T.,& Langer,E.J.(2014). The Wiley Blackwell handbook of mindfulness(Vol.1).West Sussex,UK:John Wiley & Sons.
  • Jia,L.,Karpen,S.C.,& Hirt,E.R.(2011). Beyond anti-Muslim sentiment:Opposing the Ground Zero mosque as a means to pursuing a stronger America. Psychological Science,22(10),1327-1335.
  • Kabat-Zinn,J.(1982). An outpatient program in behavioral medicine for chronic pain patients based on the practice of mindfulness meditation:Theoretical considerations and preliminary results. General Hospital Psychiatry,4(1),33-47.
  • Kabat-Zinn,J.(1990). Full catastrophe living:Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress,pain,and illness. New York:Delacourt.
  • Kabat-Zinn,J.(2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context:Past,present,and future. Clinical Psychology:Science and Practice,10(2),144-156.
  • Lal,D.(2000). Does modernization require westernization?Independent Review,5(1),5-24.
  • Langer,E.J.(1992). Matters of mind:Mindfulness/mindlessness in perspective. Consciousness and Cognition,1(3),289-305.
  • Langer,E.J.(1994). The illusion of calculated decisions.In R.C.Schank,& E.Langer(Eds.),Beliefs,reasoning,and decision making:Psycho-logic in honor of Bob Abelson(pp.33-53).Hillsdale,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
  • Langer,E.J.(2000). Mindful learning. Current Directions in Psychological Science,9(6),220-223.
  • Langer,E.J.(2009). Counter clockwise,mindful health and the power of possibilities. New York,NY:Ballantine Books.
  • Langer,E.J.(2014). Mindfulness forward and back.In A.Ie.,C.T.Ngnoumen,& E.J.Langer(Eds.),The Wiley Blackwell handbook of mindfulness(Vol.1,pp.7-20),West Sussex,UK:John Wiley & Sons.
  • Langer,E.J.,Blank,A.,& Chanowitz,B.(1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action:The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,36(6),635-642.
  • Langer,E.J.,& Moldoveanu,M.(2000). The construct of mindfulness. Journal of Social Issues,56(1),1-9.
  • Leung,A.K.Y.,& Chiu,C.-y.(2010). Multicultural experience,idea receptiveness,and creativity. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,41(5-6),723-741.
  • Leung,A.K.Y.,Maddux,W.W.,Galinsky,A.D.,& Chiu,C.-y.(2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity:The when and how. American Psychologist,63(3),169-181.
  • Maddux,W.W.,Adam,H.,& Galinsky,A.D.(2010). When in Rome...Learn why the Romans do what they do:How multicultural learning experiences facilitate creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,36(6),731-741.
  • Morris,M.W.,Chiu,C.-y.,& Liu,Z.(2015). Polycultural psychology. Annual Review of Psychology,66,631-659.
  • Na,J.,Grossmann,I.,Varnum,M.E.,Kitayama,S.,Gonzalez,R.,& Nisbett,R.E.(2010). Cultural differences are not always reducible to individual differences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,107(14),6192-6197.
  • Nguyen,H.H.(2006). Acculturation in the United Sates. In D.L.Sam,& J.W.Berry(Eds.),Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology(pp.311-310).Cambridge,UK:Cambridge University Press.
  • Nisbett,R.E.(2003). The geography of thought. New York:Free Press.
  • Nisbett,R.E.,Peng,K.,Choi,I.,& Norenzayan,A.(2001). Culture and systems of thought:Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review,108(2),291-310.
  • O’Fallon,M.J.,& Butterfield,K.D.(2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature:1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics,59(4),375-413.
  • Oyserman,D.(2011). Culture as situated cognition:Cultural mindsets,cultural fluency,and meaning making. European Review of Social Psychology,22(1),164-214.
  • Papies,E.K.,Pronk,T.M.,Keesman,M.,& Barsalou,L.W.(in press). The benefits of simply observing:Mindful attention modulates the link between motivation and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
  • Proulx,T.(2012). Threat-compensation in social psychology:Is there a core motivation?Social Cognition,30(6),643-651.
  • Proulx,T.,& Inzlicht,M.(2012). The five “A” s of meaning maintenance:Finding meaning in the theories of sense-making. Psychological Inquiry,23(4),317-335.
  • Proulx,T.,Inzlicht,M.,& Harmon-Jones,E.(2012). Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences,16(5),285-291.
  • Proulx,T.,Markman,K.D.,& Lindberg,A.M.(2013). Introduction:The new science of meaning.In K.D.Markman,T.Proulx,& M.J.Lindberg(Eds.),The psychology of meaning. Washington,DC:American Psychological Association.
  • Qiu,L.,Lin,H.,& Leung,A.K.Y.(2013). Cultural differences and switching of in-group sharing behavior between an American(Facebook)and a Chinese(Renren)social networking site. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,44(1),106-121.
  • Rohrer,F.(2010). The battle over the “Ground Zero mosque”,retrieved from http://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-10846716,Nov.23,2014.
  • Schwartz,S.J.,Unger,J.B.,Zamboanga,B.L.,& Szapocznik,J.(2010). Rethinking the concept of acculturation:Implications for theory and research. American Psychologist,65(4),237-251.
  • Schwartz,S.H.(2014). Societal value culture latent and dynamic. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,45(1),42-46.
  • Siegel,D.J.,& Siegel,M.W.(2014). Opening the mind and cultivating inner well-being through contemplative and creative mindfulness.In A.Ie.,C.T.Ngnoumen,& E.J.Langer(Eds.),The Wiley Blackwell handbook of mindfulness(Vol.1)(pp.21-47).West Sussex,UK:John Wiley & Sons.
  • Siskind,J.(1992). The invention of thanksgiving:A ritual of American nationality. Critique of Anthropology,12(2),167-191.
  • Tong,Y.-y.,Hui,P.P.-Z.,Kwan,L.,& Peng,S.(2011). National feelings or rational dealings?The role of procedural priming on the perceptions of cross-border acquisitions. Journal of Social Issues,67(4),743-759.
  • Torelli,C.J.,Chiu,C.-y.,Tam,K.P.,Au,A.K.,& Keh,H.T.(2011). Exclusionary reactions to foreign cultures:Effects of simultaneous exposure to cultures in globalized space. Journal of Social Issues,67(4),716-742.
  • Townsend,S.S.,Major,B.,Sawyer,P.J.,& Mendes,W.B.(2010). Can the absence of prejudice be more threatening than its presence?It depends on one’s worldview. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,99(6),933-947.
  • Triandis,H.C.(1995). Individualism & collectivism. Westview Press.
  • Weber,E.U.,& Morris,M.W.(2010). Culture and judgment and decision making:The constructivist turn. Perspectives on Psychological Science,5(4),410-419.
  • Wyer,R.S.,Chiu,C.-y.,& Hong,Y.-y.(Eds.)(2013). Understanding culture:Theory,research,and application. Psychology Press.
  • Yang,D.Y.-J.(2011). Clashes of civilizations:Critical conditions for evocation of hostile attitude toward foreign intrusion of cultural space. PHD dissertation,University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

文化混搭中的决策心理

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥9.18 查看全文 >

VIP免费

论文目录

  • 一 引言
    1. (一)决策者如何评价混搭情境中的文化?
    2. (二)决策者如何主动赋予被混搭文化以意义?
  • 二 文化混搭情境中“文化”的内涵及其独特性
    1. (一)文化混搭情境中“文化”的内涵
    2. (二)文化混搭情境中“文化”的独特性
  • 三 决策者如何评估混搭中的文化
    1. (一)评估过程与一般易评估性理论
      1. 1.一般易评估性理论简介
      2. 2.一般易评估性理论的主要内容
    2. (二)借鉴一般易评估性理论对文化混搭中决策过程的分析
      1. 1.文化的属性及文化的易评估性
      2. 2.文化属性与文化领域的交互作用
      3. 3.文化混搭决策的预测
  • 四 文化混搭中的意义赋予与决策者的能动性
    1. (一)意义赋予及文化混搭中的意义赋予
      1. 1.意义赋予及文化混搭中作为意义赋予的观点
      2. 2.(文化)意义的维持、违反与补偿
      3. 3.文化意义赋予的现象学分析
    2. (二)专注及文化混搭中决策者的能动性
      1. 1.专注的概念、特点及作用
      2. 2.对文化混搭带来的不确定感的新理解
  • 五 总结

论文图片/图表

查看更多>>>