- TA的作品
- 作品笔记(0)
- 作品书评(0)
-
新世界史(第2辑):古代世界的生成和成长 收藏
简 介:《新世界史》是中国人民大学历史学院主办的集刊,以马克思主义为指导,力图在新材料的解读、新理论和新方法的运用和新视角的发掘上下功夫,每辑设置不同的研究主题,设有“专题研究”、“史料及论著选译”、“学术动态”、“读史札记”、“名家访谈”、“圆桌会议”等栏目,全面展示中国世界史研究的新成果,为建设有中国特色和时代特征的世界史研究做出贡献。本书是第二辑,以“古代世界的生成和成长”为主题展开讨论。
¥ 29.7 试读
-
新世界史(第2辑):古代世界的生成和成长 收藏
作者: 徐晓旭 王大庆 执行主编 出版时间:2018年12月
简 介:《新世界史》是中国人民大学历史学院主办的集刊,以马克思主义为指导,力图在新材料的解读、新理论和新方法的运用和新视角的发掘上下功夫,每辑设置不同的研究主题,设有“专题研究”、“史料及论著选译”、“学术动态”、“读史札记”、“名家访谈”、“圆桌会议”等栏目,全面展示中国世界史研究的新成果,为建设有中国特色和时代特征的世界史研究做出贡献。本书是第二辑,以“古代世界的生成和成长”为主题展开讨论。
¥ 29.7 试读
-
世界历史上的轴心时代 收藏
作者: 王大庆 译 [瑞典]布戎·维特洛克(Björn Wittrock) 著 出版时间:2018年12月
关键词:
简 介:在过去的半个世纪中,对公元前第一个千年的解释占据了一个十分重要的位置,不仅在历史研究和宗教史研究领域如此,而且在更为广阔的人文学科和社会科学领域也是如此。这一发展中的一个焦点就是对所谓的“轴心时代”概念的不断增长的兴趣。这个术语及其背后的观念,是在第二次世界大战的强烈刺激下,由哲学家卡尔·雅斯贝尔斯在他的一本名为《历史的起源与目标》的小书中提出来的。 这本书是由一位处于引领地位的欧洲知识分子撰写的用以勾画出一个明确抛弃欧洲中心主义或基督教中心主义对世界历史的叙述的著作,是最早对这种认识做出系统化努力的著作之一。雅斯贝尔斯的研究指向了古代世界几个高级文化中相对来说同时出现的几个特点极为突出的新的思想模式,其时间锁定在公元前第一个千年中期的那几百年。这几个新的模式都展示出一种较强的反思性,坚决地走出了那些以神话思想为特征的旧模式,这些模式以不同的形式统治着较早出现的那些社会,不论是部落社会还是大规模的古代社会。从此以后,它们开创了人类的批判性思考问题的新的种种可能性,不仅关乎工艺和实用的事物,而且还关系到宇宙论、仪式和政治实践,实际上还有思想本身和它们的那些前提条件。雅斯贝尔斯把从公元前600年到公元前350年—后来他把这个时段延长至公元前800年到公元前200年—的特点归纳为“轴心时代”(Achsenzeit),当中使用了德文单词achse,意思是轴心和枢纽。
¥ 5.74 试读
-
关键词:
出处: 新世界史(第1辑)
简 介:对于“中国史”以及包括“英国史”“法国史”“亚洲史”“非洲史”等在内的“国别史”和“地区史”来说,基本上不存在一个“什么是……”这样的问题,或者说,对于这些历史研究的领域来说,其研究对象是相对单一的和比较明确的,似乎并不存在多大的讨论和争议的空间。但是,对于“世界史”来说,这却并不是一个不成问题的问题。其原因在于,一方面,如果说“历史”的概念很早就已形成且相对比较确定的话,那么,从古到今,“世界”的概念则经历了很大的变化,古代、近代和现代的人,对“世界”的理解是很不一样的,对“世界”的理解上的变化必然制约和决定着人们对“世界史”的定位和认识的变迁;另一方面,与中国很早就产生的“历史学”(近代以前,中国的历史编纂基本上仅限于“中国史”)相比,“世界史”在中国实际上是一个非常年轻的学科,如果从1949年算起,迄今也不过半个多世纪的时间。总之,无论是从世界范围还是从中国自身来看,就像“世界”的概念一样,“世界史”同样也是历史的产物,经历了从无到有和发展变化的过程。其实,不仅“世界史”,而且上面讲的“中国史”和“法国史”等概念也随着历史的发展而经历了这样或那样的变化,只不过其变化相对简单且不那么剧烈罢了。看来,对于中国的“世界史”研究者来说,探讨一下“什么是世界史”的问题不仅不是多余的,而且是十分必要的。可以说,只有把一个学科或研究领域的研究对象弄清楚,才能使这个学科或研究领域拥有一个明确的定位和存在的依据,才能使这个学科或研究领域得到健康和全面的发展。由于种种历史和现实的原因,就研究对象而言,中国的“世界史”研究至今还存在着很多模糊不清的认识,一方面,我们常常把“外国史”——不包括“中国史”在内的所谓的“世界史”——等同于“世界史”;另一方面,研究某一国别或地区的历史的学者都被贴上了“世界史”研究者的标签。这种“名”与“实”不符的现象所透视出的,正是我们对“什么是世界史”这个根本性的问题本身的探讨上的缺乏和认识上的误区。那么,“世界史”应不应该包含“中国史”?“国别史”或“地区史”跟“世界史”应该是一种什么样的关系?传统的以“国家”、“民族”或“地区”为单位的“世界史”跟20世纪60年代以后在欧美逐渐兴起的“全球史”或“新世界史”和“环境史”应该是一种什么样的关系?中国的“世界史”研究,应不应该以及如何体现中国人自己的视角,提出中国人自己的问题并做出自己的回答?如果这些问题得不到认真的思考和彻底的解决,那么中国的“世界史”学科的建设和研究水平的提高只能是一句空话。
¥ 14.16 试读
-
of the Caesars 收藏
作者: 孟广林 主编 王大庆 米辰峰 选编 出版时间:2015年06月
关键词:
出处: 西方历史文献选读(古代卷)
简 介:In the course of his sixteenth year [c. 85/84 B.C.] he lost his father. In the next consulate,having previously been nominated priest of Jupiter [by Marius and Cinna,Cos. 86],he broke his engagement with Cossutia,a lady of only equestrian rank,but very wealthy,who had been betrothed to him before he assumed the gown of manhood,and married Cornelia,daughter of that Cinna who was four times consul,by whom he afterwards had a daughter Julia;and the dictator Sulla could by no means force him to put away his wife. Therefore besides being punished by the loss of his priesthood,his wife’s dowry,and his family inheritances,Caesar was held to be one of the opposite party. He was accordingly forced to go into hiding,and though suffering from a severe attack of quartan ague,to change from one covert to another almost every night,and save himself from Sulla’s detectives by bribes. But at last,through the good offices of the Vestal virgins and of his near kinsmen,Mamercus Aemilius and Aurelius Cotta,he obtained forgiveness. Everyone knows that when Sulla had long held out against the most devoted and eminent men of his party who interceded for Caesar,and they obstinately persisted,he at last gave way and cried,either by divine inspiration or a shrewd forecast:‘Have your way and take him;only bear in mind that the man you are so eager to save will one day deal the death blow to the cause of the aristocracy,which you have joined with me in upholding;for in this Caesar there is more than one Marius.’
¥ 7.29 试读
-
作者: 孟广林 主编 王大庆 米辰峰 选编 出版时间:2015年06月
关键词:
出处: 西方历史文献选读(古代卷)
简 介:ROME at the beginning was ruled by kings. Freedom and the consulship were established by Lucius Brutus. Dictatorships were held for a temporary crisis. The power of the decemvirs did not last beyond two years,nor was the consular jurisdiction of the military tribunes of long duration. The despotisms of Cinna and Sulla were brief;the rule of Pompeius and of Crassus soon yielded before Caesar;the arms of Lepidus and Antonius before Augustus;who,when the world was wearied by civil strife,subjected it to empire under the title of “Prince.” But the successes and reverses of the old Roman people have been recorded by famous historians;and fine intellects were not wanting to describe the times of Augustus,till growing sycophancy scared them away. The histories of Tiberius,Caius,Claudius,and Nero,while they were in power,were falsified through terror,and after their death were written under the irritation of a recent hatred. Hence my purpose is to relate a few facts about Augustus- more particularly his last acts,then the reign of Tiberius,and all which follows,without either bitterness or partiality,from any motives to which I am far removed.
¥ 7.79 试读
-
Appian of Alexandria:Histories of Rome 收藏
作者: 孟广林 主编 王大庆 米辰峰 选编 出版时间:2015年06月
关键词:
出处: 西方历史文献选读(古代卷)
简 介:The plebeians and Senate of Rome were often at strife with each other concerning the enactment of laws,the cancelling of debts,the division of lands,or the election of magistrates. Internal discord did not,however,bring them to blows;there were dissensions merely and contests within the limits of the law,which they composed by making mutual concessions,and with much respect for each other. Once when the plebeians were entering on a campaign they fell into a controversy of the sort,but they did not use the weapons in their hands,but withdrew to the hill,which from that time on was called the Sacred Mount. Even then no violence was done,but they created a magistrate for their protection and called him the Tribune of the Plebs,to serve especially as a check upon the consuls,who were chosen by the Senate,so that political power should not be exclusively in their hands. From this arose still greater bitterness,and the magistrates were arrayed in stronger animosity to each other from this time on,and the Senate and plebeians took sides with them,each believing that it would prevail over the other by augmenting the power of its own magistrates. It was in the midst of contests of this kind that Marcius Coriolanus,having been banished contrary to justice,took refuge with the Volsci and levied war against his country.
¥ 3.35 试读