章节

多边联盟的形成研究:关系密度作用的情境分析

关键词

作者

罗超亮 ,贵州财经大学工商学院讲师、管理学博士,研究方向为战略管理、风险投资。在《中山大学学报》《南开管理评论》等期刊上发表多篇论文,现主持国家自然科学基金青年项目1项,参与国家自然科学基金项目多项。
符正平 ,教授,中山大学自贸区综合研究院院长,兼粤港澳发展研究院副院长,研究方向:产业组织与管理、区域发展战略与管理。
刘冰 ,中山大学旅游学院副教授、管理学博士、硕士生导师。主要研究领域为战略管理、旅游管理、风险投资、社会网络。在Tourism Management、《南开管理评论》、《旅游学刊》等期刊发表多篇论文。主持并完成国家自然科学基金项目和国家社会科学基金项目多项。
王曦 ,南华大学经济管理与法学学院讲师,管理学博士。主要研究领域为战略管理、风险投资、社会网络。在《西北工业大学学报》《山西财经大学学报》等CSSCI期刊上发表论文近10篇。主持湖南省社会科学基金项目1项,参与国家自然科学基金项目多项。

参考文献 查看全部 ↓
  • [1]党兴华,成泷,魏龙.技术创新网络分裂断层对子群极化的影响研究——基于网络嵌入性视角[J].科学学研究,2016,33(5):781-792.
  • [2]罗家德,秦朗,周伶.中国风险投资产业的圈子现象[J].管理学报,2014,11(4):469-477.
  • [3]罗家德,邹亚琦,郭戎.中国风险资本联合投资策略的差异化现象[J].现代财经:天津财经学院学报,2016,4:3-14.
  • [4]Ahuja G. Collaboration networks,structural holes,and innovation:a longitudinal study[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2000,45(3):425-455.
  • [5]Albers S,Schweiger B,Gibb J. Complexity,power and timing in multipartner alliances:an integrative review and research agenda[C]. Managing Multipartner Strategic Alliance. NY:Information Age Publishing,2015:57-87.
  • [6]Beckman C M,Haunschild P R. Network learning:the effects of partners’ heterogeneity of experience on corporate acquisitions[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2002,47(1):92-124.
  • [7]Busenitz L W,Fiet J O,Moesel D D. Reconsidering the venture capitalists’“value added” proposition:an interorganizational learning perspective[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2004,19(6):787-807.
  • [8]Chung C C,Beamish P W. Multi-party international joint ventures:multiple post-formation change processes[J]. Journal of World Business,2012,47(4):648-663.
  • [9]Das T K,Teng B S. Alliance constellations:a social exchange perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review,2002,27(3):445-456.
  • [10]Davis J P. The group dynamics of interorganizational relationships:collaborating with multiple partners in innovation ecosystems[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2016,61(4):621-661.
  • [11]De Clercq D,Dimov D. Internal knowledge development and external knowledge access in venture capital investment performance[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2008,45(3):585-612.
  • [12]Dimov D,Milanov H. The interplay of need and opportunity in venture capital investment syndication[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2010,25(4):331-348.
  • [13]Ferrary M. Syndication of venture capital investment:The art of resource pooling[J]. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2010,34(5):885-907.
  • [14]Fombrun C,Shanley M. What’s in a name?reputation building and corporate strategy[J]. Academy of management Journal,1990,33(2):233-258.
  • [15]Gu Q,Lu X. Unraveling the mechanisms of reputation and alliance formation:a study of venture capital syndication in china[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2014,35(5):739-750.
  • [16]Gulati R. Social structure and alliance formation patterns:a longitudinal analysis[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1995,40(4):619-652.
  • [17]Gulati R,Gargiulo M. Where do interorganizational networks come from?[J]. American journal of sociology,1999,104(5):1439-1493.
  • [18]Hallen B L. The causes and consequences of the initial network positions of new organizations:From whom do entrepreneurs receive investments?[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(4):685-718.
  • [19]Heidl R A,Steensma H K,Phelps C. Divisive faultlines and the unplanned dissolutions of multipartner alliances[J]. Organization Science,2014,25(5):1351-1371.
  • [20]Heimeriks K H,Duysters G. Alliance capability as a mediator between experience and alliance performance:an empirical investigation into the alliance capability development process[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2007,44(1):25-49.
  • [21]Hochberg Y V,Ljungqvist A,Lu Y. Networking as a barrier to entry and the competitive supply of venture capital[J]. The Journal of Finance,2010,65(3):829-859.
  • [22]Hochberg Y V,ljungqvist A,Lu Y. Whom you know matters:venture capital networks and investment performance[J]. The Journal of Finance,2007,62(1):251-301.
  • [23]Khanna T,Rivkin J W. Interorganizational ties and business group boundaries:Evidence from an emerging economy[J]. Organization Science,2006,17(3):333-352.
  • [24]Kogut B,Urso P,Walker G. Emergent properties of a new financial market:American venture capital syndication,1960-2005[J]. Management Science,2007,53(7):1181-1198..
  • [25]Lavie D,Lechner C,Singh H. The performance implications of timing of entry and involvement in multipartner alliances[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2007,50(3):578-604.
  • [26]Lee P M,Pollock T G,Jin K. The contingent value of venture capitalist reputation[J]. Strategic Organization,2011,9(1):33-69.
  • [27]Li D,Eden L,Hitt M A,Ireland R D,Garrett,R P. Governance in multilateral R&D alliances[J]. Organization Science,2012,23(4):1191-1210.
  • [28]Li D. Multilateral R&D alliances by new ventures[J]. Journal of Business Venturing,2013,28(2):241-260.
  • [29]Lockett A,Wright M. The syndication of venture capital investments[J]. Omega,2001,29,(5):375-390.
  • [30]Ma D,Rhee M,Yang D. Power source mismatch and the effectiveness of interorganizational relations:the case of venture capital syndication[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013,56(3):711-734.
  • [31]Makino S,Chan C M,Isobe T,Beamish P W. Intended and unintended termination of international joint ventures[J]. Strategic Management Journal,2007,28(11):1113-1132.
  • [32]Meuleman M,Lockett A,Manigart S,Wright M. Partner selection decisions in interfirm collaborations:the paradox of relational embeddedness[J]. Journal of Management Studies,2010,47(6):995-1019.
  • [33]Ozmel U,Reuer J J,Gulati R. Signals across multiple networks:How venture capital and alliance networks affect interorganizational collaboration[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2013,56(3):852-866.
  • [34]Pahnke E C,Mcdonald R,Wang D,Hallen B. Exposed:venture capital,competitor ties,and entrepreneurial innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2015,58(5):1334-1360.
  • [35]Phelps C C. A longitudinal study of the influence of alliance network structure and composition on firm exploratory innovation[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2010,53(4):890-913.
  • [36]Podolny J M. Status signals:a sociological study of market competition[M]. NJ:Princeton University Press,2010.
  • [37]Pollock T G,Lee P M,Jin K,Lashley K. (Un)Tangled exploring the asymmetric coevolution of new venture capital firms’ reputation and status[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2015,60(3):482-517.
  • [38]Polzer J T,Crisp C B,Jarvenpaa S L,Kim J W. Extending the faultline model to geographically dispersed teams:How colocated subgroups can impair group functioning[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2006,49(4):679-692.
  • [39]Sorenson O,Stuart T E. Bringing the context back in:settings and the search for syndicate partners in venture capital investment networks[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,2008,53(2):266-294.
  • [40]Thatcher S M,PATEL P C. Group faultlines a review,integration,and guide to future research[J]. Journal of Management,2012,38(4):969-1009.
  • [41]Trapido D. Competitive embeddedness and the emergence of interfirm cooperation[J]. Social Forces,2007,86(1):165-191.
  • [42]Uzzi B. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks:the paradox of embeddedness[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly,1997,42(1):35-67.
  • [43]Wassmer U,Dussauge P. Value creation in alliance portfolios:the benefits and costs of network resource interdependencies[J]. European Management Review,2011,8(1):47-64.
  • [44]Zeng M,Chen X P. Achieving cooperation in multiparty alliances:a social dilemma approach to partnership management[J]. Academy of Management Review,2003,28(4):587-605.
  • [45]Zhang L,GuptA A. Hallen B. The conditional importance of prior ties:a group-level analysis of venture capital syndication[J]. Academy of Management Journal,2017,60(4):1360-1386.

多边联盟的形成研究:关系密度作用的情境分析

可试读20%内容 PDF阅读 阅读器阅览

试读已结束,剩余80%未读

¥11.25 查看全文 >

VIP免费

章节目录

  • 第一节 研究背景
    1. 一 问题的提出
    2. 二 关系密度的内涵
  • 第二节 理论基础和研究假设
    1. 一 关系密度和多边联盟形成
    2. 二 行业知识异质性的情境作用
    3. 三 声誉异质性的情境作用
    4. 四 关系断层的情境作用
    5. 五 地位断层的情境作用
  • 第三节 研究设计
    1. 一 概念模型
    2. 二 样本选取与数据搜集
    3. 三 变量及其测度
      1. 1.声誉异质性
      2. 2.行业知识异质性
      3. 3.前期关系密度
      4. 4.关系断层
      5. 5.地位断层
  • 第四节 假设检验与结果分析
    1. 一 相关系数分析
    2. 二 Logit回归及结果分析
  • 第五节 研究结论和启示
    1. 一 研究结论
      1. (一)潜在合作伙伴之间的前期关系密度对于它们未来形成多边联盟具有重要的积极作用
      2. (二)潜在合作伙伴之间的行业知识异质性显著增强了前期关系密度的正向效应,而声誉异质性的影响并不显著
      3. (三)关系断层对多边联盟的形成也有着直接的正向影响,同时也显著增强了关系密度的正向作用
      4. (四)地位断层并未显著增强关系密度的正向作用,但是它对多边联盟的形成却有着正向的直接作用
    2. 二 启示

章节图片/图表

查看更多>>>